He has just hidden it very well, started spending millions on PR and fake news since the 90s, now spends so much astroturfing - massive amounts of traffic on reddit from 2007-2010 was from his own little form of CTR / shariahblue.
Bill Gates is worse than a globalist, he's had his head messed with as well, he's anti-American, started common core (that punishes talented children)
Bill Gates <<< search more (but you won't find...) but search!
I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful.
I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets.
Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!
Don't believe ANYONE - always ask for proveable facts.
In this case: the woman must be found, her identity checked and interviewed.
I have located her my question to all is because her tweets seem for the most parts to be the ramblings of someone who is emotionally disturbed should we take it seriously??
Raped children usually are emotionally disturbed after their experience. It's common. That's why many people don't listen to them. Her story fits with my many years of research. Study up on the MK Ultra "Super Soldier Program". Google it. Her story fits.
So long as the timestamps & tweet id number fall into line with other tweets of the time, it would be difficult for someone to fake this now, particularly given the author's penchant for creating an account, launching a brief tweet storm, then going silent. Not impossible--I'd imagine there are many deleted tweets for any given time period that could be re-purposed. But you've got referential integrity to worry about, archived internal backups that'd reveal the whole scheme, etc. It'd be a huge pain & a huge risk.
The tweet I'd number can still be faked. Millions of tweets per second go on. Basically they just need to delete a random persons tweet and replace it with hers. Noone would have a way to trace the old tweet that was deleted.
They're leads. There are tons of leads. If I can keep an acct open long enough to get to them. I got kicked out of every social media page & just now getting back in here.
Yeah you POS. You deleted my post within minutes. And then I'm locked out all fucking day. My Twitter acct is shot now. Every social media acct I have either locked out or shadow banned after that.
I've worked my ass off for this cause. Don't come calling me names because your post got removed for breaking the rules. Mods deal with enough shit. If you want to actually, oh I don't know, tell me which post you're talking about so we can discuss why it was removed, feel free.
And then I'm locked out all fucking day. My Twitter acct is shot now. Every social media acct I have either locked out or shadow banned after that.
I've never questioned your work. But I posted an URGENT response for back and you deleted it in minutes. What the hell are we doing here?
I wanted to post what I had here but I was afraid to. I have not slept in 24 hours because whoever is working behind the scenes on Twitter are LEADING us to clues.
I somewhat remember that post. All I know is it broke the rules (Rule 4, I think). That's on you. It should be pretty easy to include a link. The rules exist for very important reasons (e.g. stopping forum sliding and content dilution), and they have to be enforced uniformly. Please don't take it personally.
I don't see that it's worthy of a disinfo warning. Obviously any information can be wrong, but there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post. Could Twitter have created all of these accounts and backdated them? Possibly, but honestly, it's not likely.
I don't see why they'd split it up into all of these different accounts. Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time. There are also deleted/suspended accounts, which would be another level of them to go to in order to fake.
there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post.
This person (if this isn't a disinfo shill doing an act) is clearly mentally ill. I hope you can see how promoting the ramblings of a crazy person as evidence is potentially dangerous to our credibility. We need to be careful with this one.
Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time.
Sounds a lot like schizophrenia. It's possible that her experiences made her crazy, as she claims, but we still need to be careful.
I know all about this because I'm the one who keeps discrediting that nutcase on here with many accounts posting and promoting her "true story" under Cathy Fox and Gail Allen but authoring the story under Dr. Sue Arrigo which is, in fact, her real name. After I was sucked in and went down the rabbit hole reading her loooooong "true story" I researched for more evidence on her afterwards only to find out the story had nothing to do with the make belief cathyfox.com and gailallen.com but Sue Arrigo posted more long rants about being tortured by Barrack Obama and is still a high level CIA operative and predsidential model. Her own sister posted under the comments apologizing that she is not well and has severe schizophrenia and doesn't take her medications and lives with her elderly mother with whom she doesn't take very good care of but has plenty of idle time on her hands for these stories. She's never even had a job let alone a high level CIA operative and presidential model. I saw her Facebook and she's an obese 60 year old woman with 1970s glasses and long straggley grey brown hair. Everytime I debunk her I'm flooded by her combative messages to prove it, many different accounts. People like this are desperate for attention seeking and take away from real research into real children being abducted, abused and killed which is what we need to focus on. This very much looks a lot like stuff she would say that I read on Conspiracy Theory on her postings and the Florida-Toronto connection is a big red flag it may be her also. Further, the 2011 timeframe is plausible as she's been at this for years. I'm not totally discounting these Twitter leads yet but I'm 50/50 and she is very suspect to me at is point. @Millennial_Falcon
@Millenial_Falcon Here is the article written debunking Sue Arrigo who posts under Cathy Fox and Gail Allen to hide her real identity (she has many) and is very active on Twitter:
WHO IS SUE ANN ARRIGO, MD?
Posted on Friday, June 13, 2008 by Tom Usher
I read Sue Ann Arrigo, M.D.'s piece on conspiracyplanet.com ten days ago (not my first visit there). It was a very long read. I want to know more about her credentials before echoing her assertions. The only thing that seems to be said about her is that her medical license checks out in California. That's not much for someone who says she was a two-star general, high-level CIA agent, and FBI agent all rolled into one. Why has she been in such obscurity relative to other people such as Ray McGovern (former CIA)? He's not a household name, but the alternative sites sure know about him in a big way. Is it because she has other leanings and just doesn't run in his circles at all?
She mentioned twice a book about the science of memory as if to self-validate what she was putting forth as if she had her own doubts. That's a tip-off that she has problems and that we ought to reserve judgment.
SueAnn Arrigo's Explosive Revelations
Exposing Pentagon and CIA Corruption
By STEPHEN LENDMAN
Order CounterPunch
June 11, 2008
Information for this article comes from long-time business, finance and political writer and analyst Bob Chapman who publishes the bi-weekly International Forecaster. It's power-packed with key information and a valued source for this writer. He obtained voluminous material directly from its source. People need to know it. Read on.
SueAnn Arrigo is the source. She was a high-level CIA insider. Her title was Special Operations Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI). She also established the Remote Viewing Defense protocols for the Pentagon in her capacity as Remote Viewing Advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).
Well, I decided to look a little further today, because I like much of what Stephen Lendman writes. Here's one thing I found.
Friday, July 27, 2007
Return from Spookyville
On June 2 I posted a piece called A short trip to Spookyville , concerning the incredible allegations of Dr. Sue Arrigo M.D., allegedly an "ex- CIA physician with high level access".
Briefly, she maintained that HIV/Aids was deliberately unleashed on the world and that there is a vaccine which has been kept secret. She also described running secret missions for Dick Cheney and to have twice treated Osama bin Laden after 9/11. My post was picked up by several conspiracy sites.
It's not that I wasn't skeptical of her claims. In fact I wrote: "Just because someone has an M.D. after her name does not mean that she may not be suffering from mental illness. "
One thing that did intrigue me, however, was that her sister Maria Arrigo, Ph.D., described herself in a paper as "a social psychologist studying intelligence ethics and as daughter of an undercover intelligence officer."
As it turns out Sue Arrigo has another sister, Linda Gail Arrigo, Ph.D. in Sociology, who left a comment on my original post stating in part:
I am sorry to say that my sister Sue Ann Arrigo has periodic episodes of paranoid schizophrenia, and this has been over a period of ten years at least. It is amazing how her wild stories have proliferated all over the web.
I have since exchanged a few emails with Linda Arrigo. She writes:
I believe that my sister Sue Ann has been having periodic bouts of paranoid schizophrenia since about 15 years ago. She is convinced that our father was both a member of the CIA and the Mafia, and that he inducted her at a young age into intelligence activities, and that she has been under mind control since then, and subject to frequent kidnapping and threats by agents, wherever she is in the world. However, she has no material or historical evidence of this other than her later memories and physical symptoms, as she reported recently for supposedly being kidnapped in Ireland in early June 2007. I talked by telephone with my mother who was with her right afterwards and accompanied her to the doctor and the police, and my mother now believes Sue Ann is subject to hallucinations.
Our father, born 1914, served 20 years in the U.S. military, about 1941-61, in Europe, the Pentagon, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. His work was logistics, not intelligence. I lived with him in Taiwan 1963-68; my sisters had virtually no contact with him after 1962. He is senile now, in San Francisco, and I sorted through most of his papers during the last few summers. He is not a pleasant personality, but I am certain he had no such CIA contacts or capacity.
If any consistent check were made on Sue Ann's schooling and employment for the last 30 years, it would be obvious that her current allegations of service as a CIA medic are pure fantasy, even if well-informed by public knowledge of current issues in U.S. government behavior.
There are enough real victims of U.S. military and intelligence actions; it is not surprising, perhaps, that victims of schizophrenia like my sister should feed on these accounts.
Given the incredible allegations of Dr. Sue Arrigo, the complete lack of supporting evidence, and this statement by her sister, I see no reason to give any credence to her claims. I wish her well.
Here's an entire forum thread on democraticunderground.com about it: Reply #127: Her sister says Sue Ann
I haven't read any of the thread. It's too much for me to read right now. I think much of what I've written here will be said there by others.
Now, this is not definitive, but until someone shows that Sue Ann Arrigo is what she claims, I for one am reserving judgment.
I don't doubt that others have been abducted and brainwashed, etc. Most of that is well-documented, and governments have made open apologies and paid victims. Of course, governments can create schizophrenia. Abuse creates it. Abuse, torture, breaks the mind in that way.
That doesn't mean that schizophrenics don't have any real memories. It also doesn't mean that love can't heal schizophrenia.
I believe that Sue Ann Arrigo was abused, but was it the government and did she end up holding high non-elected offices in U.S. intelligence? I strongly doubt it in her case.
Of course, who can be certain as to whether or not she's a creation to make conspiracy theories against the government in general appear to come only from those suffering from delusions? Disinformation is the government propagandist's tool.
Look at what it may do to Stephen Lendman's body of work if conservative tricksters can point the finger at him saying that he was taken in by Sue Ann Arrigo. Why not suspect everything Stephen has written is what that would be designed to do.
@Millennial_Falcon. This is a comment taken from an article debunking Dr. Sue Arrigo:
I lived with Sue Arrigo. I rented a room at her mother's house when I was going to college, and later when the economic downturn occurred. Sue moved into her mother's house during the latter period. She's told me she was a tunnel rat during the Vietnam War (extremely hard to believe based on her size alone, besides the fact that it wasn't a women's job during that era). She claimed she also helped negotiate the SALT1 and SALT2 nuclear arms treaties and the Helsinki Accords, and treated Osama bin Laden for kidney problems twice at the request of the CIA before 9/11, along with many other things.
She once called the San Diego District Attorney's office and requested to speak to FBI Counter Intelligence. The reason? She found small bruises on her 90 year old mother and concluded that I had let the KGB into the house during the night and assisted them in torturing her mother. Where the police officers arrived they concluded after a brief conversation with Sue that she should be transported to the county mental health facility for observation.
Sue is intelligent but irrational, she has stayed in her aluminium foil wrapped room for days to post articles on different conspiracy theory websites. She once changed the home Internet service without ordering phone service, leaving her elderly mother helplessly unable to call for help in case of a fire or medical emergency. Please don't encourage her by subscribing to her ideas or believing her claims, it diverts her from taking care of her now 94 year old mother.
Oh, so now you're a medical expert that can diagnose illnesses. Okay. We need to be careful with ALL information, not just this information. But you don't put "possible disinfo" with all other posts.
EDIT: And I stress, you have absolutely NO evidence Twitter made all this up and backdated it. The fact that this goes all the way back to 2010 says a lot. Again, maybe she's making it all up, but anything can be wrong, and you have no evidence this is more likely to be wrong. In fact, an Australian officer on Reddit said that he doesn't even think she's mentally ill.
Oh you know, the "concern trolling" of you mislabeling everything and deleting good information. Then when I post about mods abusing power in the other pizzagate subverse you don't even look at it. Stop abusing your power. I also love the irony of you using the "possible disinfo" as evidence that it's possible disinfo. lol That irony is not lost on me.
Common sense would dictate that you didn't need to flair it. And don't lie to me. You flaired it on your own. It had nothing to do with concerns of others.
Did I want to flair it already? Yes. But I did not do so without strong evidence of agreement from the community. My comment that you first replied to was a reply to this one: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1654349/8088456
"WARNING! I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful. I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets. Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!"
Currently 10 upvotes, ZERO downvotes. Now go away, lying troll.
yes stay suspicious and try to verify what we can! Twitter is totally compromised and anti-Trump full SJW...lots of corrupt people working there that could probably change dates on things. Also she could be right about half the stuff and imagining half the other stuff. Investigate and verify and connect whatever dots we can with as much evidence as we can!!
Its probably not as anti-trump as you think. Dorsey has his team filter out all the positive comments on Trumps tweets and seeds strictly negative things about him to give the appearance that everyone is against him. If it wasnt for that the comments would likely be overwhelmingly positive.
sorry that's what I meant, not the people using it but the mod team at twitter HQ themselves are compromised or full anti-Trump SJW etc, they fucked with a lot of stuff during gamergate too (anti-GGs calling in mod favors and bragging about having high up connections)...and those people would be the people able to make fake Tweets and change the posting date on them to 2011 (possibly explaining why these don't show up in any internet archives)
omg thankyou you are the MVP can't believe we found this there's so much to go through and verify and so many names and events we already have suspicions of
Was just looking over this in Reddit, thanks for bringing here...it sounds so nuts... but then she is calling pelosi AND posdestas baby killers and organ traffikers in 2011!!! That has to be gone through for any shred of real evidence. ugh, ugh, how daunting..
view the rest of the comments →
leahxpearl ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104101/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne98
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104153/https://twitter.com/catherineagne97
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104339/https://twitter.com/catherineagne94
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104448/https://twitter.com/catherineagne93
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104715/https://twitter.com/catherineagne93 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217104818/https://twitter.com/catherineagne91 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217104925/https://twitter.com/catherineagne90 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110459/https://twitter.com/catherineagne88
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217105047/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne89
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110817/https://twitter.com/catherineagne87
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110923/https://twitter.com/catherineagne86
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110929/https://twitter.com/catherineagne85
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111059/https://twitter.com/catherineagne84
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111214/https://twitter.com/catherineagne83
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111301/https://twitter.com/catherineagne82
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111321/https://twitter.com/catherineagne81
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111409/https://twitter.com/catherineagne80
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111450/https://twitter.com/catherineagne79
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111447/https://twitter.com/catherineagne77
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111500/https://twitter.com/catherineagne76
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111525/https://twitter.com/catherineagne75
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111647/https://twitter.com/catherineagne74
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093157/https://mobile.twitter.com/CATHERINEAGNE73
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111801/https://twitter.com/catherineagne71
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111758/https://mobile.twitter.com/CATHERINEAGNE70
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111933/https://twitter.com/catherineagne72
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111806/https://twitter.com/catherineagne69
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112143/https://twitter.com/catherineagne67
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112756/https://twitter.com/catherineagne66
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112844/https://twitter.com/catherineagne65
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112939/https://twitter.com/catherineagne64
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113039/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne61
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093415/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne63
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113044/https://twitter.com/catherineagne62
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113145/https://twitter.com/catherineagne60
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113157/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne59
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113251/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne58
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113314/https://twitter.com/catherineagne57
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113532/https://twitter.com/catherineagne56
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113528/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne55
http://web.archive.org/web/https://twitter.com/catherineagne53
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113700/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne54
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113707/https://twitter.com/catherineagne53
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113802/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne52
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113804/https://twitter.com/catherineagne51
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113849/https://twitter.com/catherineagne50
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113847/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne49
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217142617/https://twitter.com/catherineagne48
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114019/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne47
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114048/https://twitter.com/catherineagne46
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114059/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne45
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114202/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne44
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114204/https://twitter.com/catherineagne43
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114307/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne42
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114310/https://twitter.com/catherineagne41
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114359/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne40
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114356/https://twitter.com/catherineagne39
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114423/https://twitter.com/catherineagne38
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114534/https://twitter.com/catherineagne37
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114537/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne36
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114645/https://twitter.com/catherineagne35
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114641/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne34
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114655/https://twitter.com/catherineagne33
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114822/https://twitter.com/catherineagne32
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114829/https://twitter.com/catherineagne31
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114826/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne30
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115105/https://twitter.com/catherineagne29
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115108/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne28
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115101/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne27
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115355/https://twitter.com/catherineagne26
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115443/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne25
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115446/https://twitter.com/catherineagne24
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115906/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne23
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115909/https://twitter.com/catherineagne22
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120028/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne21
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115952/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne20
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120100/https://twitter.com/catherineagne19
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120102/https://twitter.com/catherineagne18
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120106/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne17
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120227/https://twitter.com/catherineagne16
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120224/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne15
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120340/https://twitter.com/catherineagne14
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120314/https://twitter.com/catherineagne13
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120442/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne12
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093338/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne11
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120518/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne10
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120603/https://twitter.com/CATfagnew
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093503/https://mobile.twitter.com/AgnewFRANCE
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120917/https://twitter.com/francesmullin
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120836/https://twitter.com/catherinefagnew
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120937/https://twitter.com/catheri41183970
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217121051/https://twitter.com/AGNEWmullinss
wilw ago
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120102/https://twitter.com/catherineagne18/status/121737069927206912
REMINDER: BILL GATES IS WORSE THAN SOROS
He has just hidden it very well, started spending millions on PR and fake news since the 90s, now spends so much astroturfing - massive amounts of traffic on reddit from 2007-2010 was from his own little form of CTR / shariahblue.
Bill Gates is worse than a globalist, he's had his head messed with as well, he's anti-American, started common core (that punishes talented children)
Bill Gates <<< search more (but you won't find...) but search!
SickofRedditsShit ago
Whats FAA stand for? It can't be the federal aviation administration right?
abortionburger ago
Hijacking for visibility.
catherine agnew @catherineagne44 25 Oct 11 STATE OF FLORIDA HAS A DEATH CERTIFICATE ON ME- I'M ALIVE -LEFT THAT STATE LAST NOV23,2010TOOK IT ALL YOU GARBAGE-TOLD ALL I DIED-KEPT MONEY Found it here: https://www.searchquarry.com/namesearch/name_register_double.phtml?recordtype=Death&fname=Catherine&lname=Agnew&city=deltona&state=fl&courthouse=Volusia%20County%20Death%20Records%20Database&court_city=&court_state=&age=54&zip=&co=&trackstat=death&aliasid=death&recordtype=Death&type= Relatives: James Agnew, 61 John Agnew, 65 Patricia Labarbera, 49 Frederick Mullin, 59 Grace Mullin, 56 Grace Mullin, 92 Mary Mullin, 52 Jane Porcaro, 57 Virginia Schultheiss, 50
atheist4thecause ago
Make sure you archive with replies.
micha_ ago
WARNING!
I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful. I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets. Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!
Don't believe ANYONE - always ask for proveable facts. In this case: the woman must be found, her identity checked and interviewed.
ps: fantastic job!
detfrank ago
I have located her my question to all is because her tweets seem for the most parts to be the ramblings of someone who is emotionally disturbed should we take it seriously??
Ang68 ago
Raped children usually are emotionally disturbed after their experience. It's common. That's why many people don't listen to them. Her story fits with my many years of research. Study up on the MK Ultra "Super Soldier Program". Google it. Her story fits.
madhatter67 ago
I think she deserves to be listened to....A lot of stuff she rambled seems relevant now
sawn ago
So long as the timestamps & tweet id number fall into line with other tweets of the time, it would be difficult for someone to fake this now, particularly given the author's penchant for creating an account, launching a brief tweet storm, then going silent. Not impossible--I'd imagine there are many deleted tweets for any given time period that could be re-purposed. But you've got referential integrity to worry about, archived internal backups that'd reveal the whole scheme, etc. It'd be a huge pain & a huge risk.
Here's a dump & some data: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9bb3b25a9a5a9c491b8708ce6759fc9d
Werwer12 ago
The tweet I'd number can still be faked. Millions of tweets per second go on. Basically they just need to delete a random persons tweet and replace it with hers. Noone would have a way to trace the old tweet that was deleted.
pschemmo ago
Both WorldCorpo videos and these Twitter profiles are huge leads or huge traps. Be careful, please!
Ronnilynn31 ago
They're leads. There are tons of leads. If I can keep an acct open long enough to get to them. I got kicked out of every social media page & just now getting back in here.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Yup. Flairing with possible disinfo warning.
Ronnilynn31 ago
Yeah you POS. You deleted my post within minutes. And then I'm locked out all fucking day. My Twitter acct is shot now. Every social media acct I have either locked out or shadow banned after that.
Millennial_Falcon ago
I've worked my ass off for this cause. Don't come calling me names because your post got removed for breaking the rules. Mods deal with enough shit. If you want to actually, oh I don't know, tell me which post you're talking about so we can discuss why it was removed, feel free.
Not sure what that has to do with me.
Ronnilynn31 ago
I've never questioned your work. But I posted an URGENT response for back and you deleted it in minutes. What the hell are we doing here?
I wanted to post what I had here but I was afraid to. I have not slept in 24 hours because whoever is working behind the scenes on Twitter are LEADING us to clues.
Millennial_Falcon ago
I somewhat remember that post. All I know is it broke the rules (Rule 4, I think). That's on you. It should be pretty easy to include a link. The rules exist for very important reasons (e.g. stopping forum sliding and content dilution), and they have to be enforced uniformly. Please don't take it personally.
Ronnilynn31 ago
It's over. I just wanted support because it honestly scared the shit out of me. That it could flag me and follow me to every forum.
We are dealing with the top of the top. They will not fall easy. I've realized today, finally, what exactly Snowden was doing for us.
Millennial_Falcon ago
What was that flagged you, and what do you mean when you say it followed you?
atheist4thecause ago
I don't see that it's worthy of a disinfo warning. Obviously any information can be wrong, but there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post. Could Twitter have created all of these accounts and backdated them? Possibly, but honestly, it's not likely.
I don't see why they'd split it up into all of these different accounts. Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time. There are also deleted/suspended accounts, which would be another level of them to go to in order to fake.
Millennial_Falcon ago
This person (if this isn't a disinfo shill doing an act) is clearly mentally ill. I hope you can see how promoting the ramblings of a crazy person as evidence is potentially dangerous to our credibility. We need to be careful with this one.
Sounds a lot like schizophrenia. It's possible that her experiences made her crazy, as she claims, but we still need to be careful.
Truthseeker3000 ago
I know all about this because I'm the one who keeps discrediting that nutcase on here with many accounts posting and promoting her "true story" under Cathy Fox and Gail Allen but authoring the story under Dr. Sue Arrigo which is, in fact, her real name. After I was sucked in and went down the rabbit hole reading her loooooong "true story" I researched for more evidence on her afterwards only to find out the story had nothing to do with the make belief cathyfox.com and gailallen.com but Sue Arrigo posted more long rants about being tortured by Barrack Obama and is still a high level CIA operative and predsidential model. Her own sister posted under the comments apologizing that she is not well and has severe schizophrenia and doesn't take her medications and lives with her elderly mother with whom she doesn't take very good care of but has plenty of idle time on her hands for these stories. She's never even had a job let alone a high level CIA operative and presidential model. I saw her Facebook and she's an obese 60 year old woman with 1970s glasses and long straggley grey brown hair. Everytime I debunk her I'm flooded by her combative messages to prove it, many different accounts. People like this are desperate for attention seeking and take away from real research into real children being abducted, abused and killed which is what we need to focus on. This very much looks a lot like stuff she would say that I read on Conspiracy Theory on her postings and the Florida-Toronto connection is a big red flag it may be her also. Further, the 2011 timeframe is plausible as she's been at this for years. I'm not totally discounting these Twitter leads yet but I'm 50/50 and she is very suspect to me at is point. @Millennial_Falcon
Ang68 ago
You sound like a disinformationist to me.
Truthseeker3000 ago
Nice try. Look up what I wrote and verify it all for yourself. But you already know I'm sure.
Millennial_Falcon ago
How do you know Catherine Agnew = Sue Arrigo? If you have info debunking this, PLEASE make a post about it.
Truthseeker3000 ago
@Millenial_Falcon Here is the article written debunking Sue Arrigo who posts under Cathy Fox and Gail Allen to hide her real identity (she has many) and is very active on Twitter:
WHO IS SUE ANN ARRIGO, MD? Posted on Friday, June 13, 2008 by Tom Usher I read Sue Ann Arrigo, M.D.'s piece on conspiracyplanet.com ten days ago (not my first visit there). It was a very long read. I want to know more about her credentials before echoing her assertions. The only thing that seems to be said about her is that her medical license checks out in California. That's not much for someone who says she was a two-star general, high-level CIA agent, and FBI agent all rolled into one. Why has she been in such obscurity relative to other people such as Ray McGovern (former CIA)? He's not a household name, but the alternative sites sure know about him in a big way. Is it because she has other leanings and just doesn't run in his circles at all?
She mentioned twice a book about the science of memory as if to self-validate what she was putting forth as if she had her own doubts. That's a tip-off that she has problems and that we ought to reserve judgment.
SueAnn Arrigo's Explosive Revelations Exposing Pentagon and CIA Corruption By STEPHEN LENDMAN Order CounterPunch June 11, 2008
Information for this article comes from long-time business, finance and political writer and analyst Bob Chapman who publishes the bi-weekly International Forecaster. It's power-packed with key information and a valued source for this writer. He obtained voluminous material directly from its source. People need to know it. Read on.
SueAnn Arrigo is the source. She was a high-level CIA insider. Her title was Special Operations Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI). She also established the Remote Viewing Defense protocols for the Pentagon in her capacity as Remote Viewing Advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).
Well, I decided to look a little further today, because I like much of what Stephen Lendman writes. Here's one thing I found.
Friday, July 27, 2007 Return from Spookyville
On June 2 I posted a piece called A short trip to Spookyville , concerning the incredible allegations of Dr. Sue Arrigo M.D., allegedly an "ex- CIA physician with high level access".
Briefly, she maintained that HIV/Aids was deliberately unleashed on the world and that there is a vaccine which has been kept secret. She also described running secret missions for Dick Cheney and to have twice treated Osama bin Laden after 9/11. My post was picked up by several conspiracy sites.
It's not that I wasn't skeptical of her claims. In fact I wrote: "Just because someone has an M.D. after her name does not mean that she may not be suffering from mental illness. "
One thing that did intrigue me, however, was that her sister Maria Arrigo, Ph.D., described herself in a paper as "a social psychologist studying intelligence ethics and as daughter of an undercover intelligence officer."
As it turns out Sue Arrigo has another sister, Linda Gail Arrigo, Ph.D. in Sociology, who left a comment on my original post stating in part:
I am sorry to say that my sister Sue Ann Arrigo has periodic episodes of paranoid schizophrenia, and this has been over a period of ten years at least. It is amazing how her wild stories have proliferated all over the web.
I have since exchanged a few emails with Linda Arrigo. She writes:
I believe that my sister Sue Ann has been having periodic bouts of paranoid schizophrenia since about 15 years ago. She is convinced that our father was both a member of the CIA and the Mafia, and that he inducted her at a young age into intelligence activities, and that she has been under mind control since then, and subject to frequent kidnapping and threats by agents, wherever she is in the world. However, she has no material or historical evidence of this other than her later memories and physical symptoms, as she reported recently for supposedly being kidnapped in Ireland in early June 2007. I talked by telephone with my mother who was with her right afterwards and accompanied her to the doctor and the police, and my mother now believes Sue Ann is subject to hallucinations.
Our father, born 1914, served 20 years in the U.S. military, about 1941-61, in Europe, the Pentagon, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. His work was logistics, not intelligence. I lived with him in Taiwan 1963-68; my sisters had virtually no contact with him after 1962. He is senile now, in San Francisco, and I sorted through most of his papers during the last few summers. He is not a pleasant personality, but I am certain he had no such CIA contacts or capacity.
If any consistent check were made on Sue Ann's schooling and employment for the last 30 years, it would be obvious that her current allegations of service as a CIA medic are pure fantasy, even if well-informed by public knowledge of current issues in U.S. government behavior.
There are enough real victims of U.S. military and intelligence actions; it is not surprising, perhaps, that victims of schizophrenia like my sister should feed on these accounts.
Given the incredible allegations of Dr. Sue Arrigo, the complete lack of supporting evidence, and this statement by her sister, I see no reason to give any credence to her claims. I wish her well.
Here's an entire forum thread on democraticunderground.com about it: Reply #127: Her sister says Sue Ann
I haven't read any of the thread. It's too much for me to read right now. I think much of what I've written here will be said there by others.
Now, this is not definitive, but until someone shows that Sue Ann Arrigo is what she claims, I for one am reserving judgment.
I don't doubt that others have been abducted and brainwashed, etc. Most of that is well-documented, and governments have made open apologies and paid victims. Of course, governments can create schizophrenia. Abuse creates it. Abuse, torture, breaks the mind in that way.
That doesn't mean that schizophrenics don't have any real memories. It also doesn't mean that love can't heal schizophrenia.
I believe that Sue Ann Arrigo was abused, but was it the government and did she end up holding high non-elected offices in U.S. intelligence? I strongly doubt it in her case.
Of course, who can be certain as to whether or not she's a creation to make conspiracy theories against the government in general appear to come only from those suffering from delusions? Disinformation is the government propagandist's tool.
Look at what it may do to Stephen Lendman's body of work if conservative tricksters can point the finger at him saying that he was taken in by Sue Ann Arrigo. Why not suspect everything Stephen has written is what that would be designed to do.
Truthseeker3000 ago
@Millennial_Falcon. This is a comment taken from an article debunking Dr. Sue Arrigo:
I lived with Sue Arrigo. I rented a room at her mother's house when I was going to college, and later when the economic downturn occurred. Sue moved into her mother's house during the latter period. She's told me she was a tunnel rat during the Vietnam War (extremely hard to believe based on her size alone, besides the fact that it wasn't a women's job during that era). She claimed she also helped negotiate the SALT1 and SALT2 nuclear arms treaties and the Helsinki Accords, and treated Osama bin Laden for kidney problems twice at the request of the CIA before 9/11, along with many other things.
She once called the San Diego District Attorney's office and requested to speak to FBI Counter Intelligence. The reason? She found small bruises on her 90 year old mother and concluded that I had let the KGB into the house during the night and assisted them in torturing her mother. Where the police officers arrived they concluded after a brief conversation with Sue that she should be transported to the county mental health facility for observation.
Sue is intelligent but irrational, she has stayed in her aluminium foil wrapped room for days to post articles on different conspiracy theory websites. She once changed the home Internet service without ordering phone service, leaving her elderly mother helplessly unable to call for help in case of a fire or medical emergency. Please don't encourage her by subscribing to her ideas or believing her claims, it diverts her from taking care of her now 94 year old mother.
atheist4thecause ago
Oh, so now you're a medical expert that can diagnose illnesses. Okay. We need to be careful with ALL information, not just this information. But you don't put "possible disinfo" with all other posts.
EDIT: And I stress, you have absolutely NO evidence Twitter made all this up and backdated it. The fact that this goes all the way back to 2010 says a lot. Again, maybe she's making it all up, but anything can be wrong, and you have no evidence this is more likely to be wrong. In fact, an Australian officer on Reddit said that he doesn't even think she's mentally ill.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Stop your damn concern trolling. You want evidence she's mentally ill? SHE SAID IT HERSELF. And just read some of her damn tweets.
atheist4thecause ago
Oh you know, the "concern trolling" of you mislabeling everything and deleting good information. Then when I post about mods abusing power in the other pizzagate subverse you don't even look at it. Stop abusing your power. I also love the irony of you using the "possible disinfo" as evidence that it's possible disinfo. lol That irony is not lost on me.
Millennial_Falcon ago
I flaired it based on concerns expressed (and upvoted) by users, not to mention common sense.
atheist4thecause ago
Common sense would dictate that you didn't need to flair it. And don't lie to me. You flaired it on your own. It had nothing to do with concerns of others.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Did I want to flair it already? Yes. But I did not do so without strong evidence of agreement from the community. My comment that you first replied to was a reply to this one: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1654349/8088456
"WARNING! I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful. I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets. Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!"
Currently 10 upvotes, ZERO downvotes. Now go away, lying troll.
The_Invincible_Moose ago
Staying skeptical.
In one tweet "JILL BIDEN STABBING SECRET SERVICE &FEDS WITH MORPHINE ERIC HOLDER,EMAUEL DOING IT " http://archive.is/pZ2EKb
In another "ALL ARE EXTREME TERRORIST & KKK" http://archive.is/McEXF
Is Eric Holder KKK?
gt8h65fg ago
She or he was tweeting few hours ago...
Godwillwin ago
I think the person tweeting last night was a shill but I think the 2011 tweets are more likely to be by a victim?? I don't know though. ???
The_Invincible_Moose ago
Link???
wehaveyouremails ago
yes stay suspicious and try to verify what we can! Twitter is totally compromised and anti-Trump full SJW...lots of corrupt people working there that could probably change dates on things. Also she could be right about half the stuff and imagining half the other stuff. Investigate and verify and connect whatever dots we can with as much evidence as we can!!
Ang68 ago
She is definitely right. The people she lists are people I've researched for a lot of years now. Twisted.
blind_sypher ago
Its probably not as anti-trump as you think. Dorsey has his team filter out all the positive comments on Trumps tweets and seeds strictly negative things about him to give the appearance that everyone is against him. If it wasnt for that the comments would likely be overwhelmingly positive.
wehaveyouremails ago
sorry that's what I meant, not the people using it but the mod team at twitter HQ themselves are compromised or full anti-Trump SJW etc, they fucked with a lot of stuff during gamergate too (anti-GGs calling in mod favors and bragging about having high up connections)...and those people would be the people able to make fake Tweets and change the posting date on them to 2011 (possibly explaining why these don't show up in any internet archives)
wehaveyouremails ago
omg thankyou you are the MVP can't believe we found this there's so much to go through and verify and so many names and events we already have suspicions of
squirreltruth ago
Was just looking over this in Reddit, thanks for bringing here...it sounds so nuts... but then she is calling pelosi AND posdestas baby killers and organ traffikers in 2011!!! That has to be gone through for any shred of real evidence. ugh, ugh, how daunting..