I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful.
I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets.
Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!
Don't believe ANYONE - always ask for proveable facts.
In this case: the woman must be found, her identity checked and interviewed.
I don't see that it's worthy of a disinfo warning. Obviously any information can be wrong, but there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post. Could Twitter have created all of these accounts and backdated them? Possibly, but honestly, it's not likely.
I don't see why they'd split it up into all of these different accounts. Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time. There are also deleted/suspended accounts, which would be another level of them to go to in order to fake.
there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post.
This person (if this isn't a disinfo shill doing an act) is clearly mentally ill. I hope you can see how promoting the ramblings of a crazy person as evidence is potentially dangerous to our credibility. We need to be careful with this one.
Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time.
Sounds a lot like schizophrenia. It's possible that her experiences made her crazy, as she claims, but we still need to be careful.
I know all about this because I'm the one who keeps discrediting that nutcase on here with many accounts posting and promoting her "true story" under Cathy Fox and Gail Allen but authoring the story under Dr. Sue Arrigo which is, in fact, her real name. After I was sucked in and went down the rabbit hole reading her loooooong "true story" I researched for more evidence on her afterwards only to find out the story had nothing to do with the make belief cathyfox.com and gailallen.com but Sue Arrigo posted more long rants about being tortured by Barrack Obama and is still a high level CIA operative and predsidential model. Her own sister posted under the comments apologizing that she is not well and has severe schizophrenia and doesn't take her medications and lives with her elderly mother with whom she doesn't take very good care of but has plenty of idle time on her hands for these stories. She's never even had a job let alone a high level CIA operative and presidential model. I saw her Facebook and she's an obese 60 year old woman with 1970s glasses and long straggley grey brown hair. Everytime I debunk her I'm flooded by her combative messages to prove it, many different accounts. People like this are desperate for attention seeking and take away from real research into real children being abducted, abused and killed which is what we need to focus on. This very much looks a lot like stuff she would say that I read on Conspiracy Theory on her postings and the Florida-Toronto connection is a big red flag it may be her also. Further, the 2011 timeframe is plausible as she's been at this for years. I'm not totally discounting these Twitter leads yet but I'm 50/50 and she is very suspect to me at is point. @Millennial_Falcon
view the rest of the comments →
leahxpearl ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104101/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne98
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104153/https://twitter.com/catherineagne97
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104339/https://twitter.com/catherineagne94
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104448/https://twitter.com/catherineagne93
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104715/https://twitter.com/catherineagne93 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217104818/https://twitter.com/catherineagne91 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217104925/https://twitter.com/catherineagne90 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110459/https://twitter.com/catherineagne88
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217105047/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne89
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110817/https://twitter.com/catherineagne87
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110923/https://twitter.com/catherineagne86
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110929/https://twitter.com/catherineagne85
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111059/https://twitter.com/catherineagne84
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111214/https://twitter.com/catherineagne83
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111301/https://twitter.com/catherineagne82
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111321/https://twitter.com/catherineagne81
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111409/https://twitter.com/catherineagne80
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111450/https://twitter.com/catherineagne79
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111447/https://twitter.com/catherineagne77
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111500/https://twitter.com/catherineagne76
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111525/https://twitter.com/catherineagne75
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111647/https://twitter.com/catherineagne74
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093157/https://mobile.twitter.com/CATHERINEAGNE73
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111801/https://twitter.com/catherineagne71
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111758/https://mobile.twitter.com/CATHERINEAGNE70
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111933/https://twitter.com/catherineagne72
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111806/https://twitter.com/catherineagne69
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112143/https://twitter.com/catherineagne67
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112756/https://twitter.com/catherineagne66
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112844/https://twitter.com/catherineagne65
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112939/https://twitter.com/catherineagne64
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113039/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne61
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093415/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne63
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113044/https://twitter.com/catherineagne62
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113145/https://twitter.com/catherineagne60
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113157/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne59
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113251/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne58
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113314/https://twitter.com/catherineagne57
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113532/https://twitter.com/catherineagne56
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113528/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne55
http://web.archive.org/web/https://twitter.com/catherineagne53
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113700/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne54
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113707/https://twitter.com/catherineagne53
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113802/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne52
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113804/https://twitter.com/catherineagne51
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113849/https://twitter.com/catherineagne50
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113847/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne49
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217142617/https://twitter.com/catherineagne48
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114019/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne47
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114048/https://twitter.com/catherineagne46
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114059/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne45
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114202/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne44
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114204/https://twitter.com/catherineagne43
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114307/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne42
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114310/https://twitter.com/catherineagne41
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114359/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne40
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114356/https://twitter.com/catherineagne39
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114423/https://twitter.com/catherineagne38
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114534/https://twitter.com/catherineagne37
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114537/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne36
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114645/https://twitter.com/catherineagne35
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114641/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne34
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114655/https://twitter.com/catherineagne33
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114822/https://twitter.com/catherineagne32
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114829/https://twitter.com/catherineagne31
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114826/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne30
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115105/https://twitter.com/catherineagne29
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115108/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne28
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115101/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne27
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115355/https://twitter.com/catherineagne26
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115443/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne25
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115446/https://twitter.com/catherineagne24
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115906/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne23
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115909/https://twitter.com/catherineagne22
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120028/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne21
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115952/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne20
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120100/https://twitter.com/catherineagne19
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120102/https://twitter.com/catherineagne18
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120106/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne17
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120227/https://twitter.com/catherineagne16
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120224/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne15
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120340/https://twitter.com/catherineagne14
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120314/https://twitter.com/catherineagne13
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120442/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne12
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093338/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne11
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120518/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne10
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120603/https://twitter.com/CATfagnew
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093503/https://mobile.twitter.com/AgnewFRANCE
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120917/https://twitter.com/francesmullin
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120836/https://twitter.com/catherinefagnew
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120937/https://twitter.com/catheri41183970
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217121051/https://twitter.com/AGNEWmullinss
micha_ ago
WARNING!
I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful. I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets. Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!
Don't believe ANYONE - always ask for proveable facts. In this case: the woman must be found, her identity checked and interviewed.
ps: fantastic job!
Millennial_Falcon ago
Yup. Flairing with possible disinfo warning.
atheist4thecause ago
I don't see that it's worthy of a disinfo warning. Obviously any information can be wrong, but there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post. Could Twitter have created all of these accounts and backdated them? Possibly, but honestly, it's not likely.
I don't see why they'd split it up into all of these different accounts. Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time. There are also deleted/suspended accounts, which would be another level of them to go to in order to fake.
Millennial_Falcon ago
This person (if this isn't a disinfo shill doing an act) is clearly mentally ill. I hope you can see how promoting the ramblings of a crazy person as evidence is potentially dangerous to our credibility. We need to be careful with this one.
Sounds a lot like schizophrenia. It's possible that her experiences made her crazy, as she claims, but we still need to be careful.
Truthseeker3000 ago
I know all about this because I'm the one who keeps discrediting that nutcase on here with many accounts posting and promoting her "true story" under Cathy Fox and Gail Allen but authoring the story under Dr. Sue Arrigo which is, in fact, her real name. After I was sucked in and went down the rabbit hole reading her loooooong "true story" I researched for more evidence on her afterwards only to find out the story had nothing to do with the make belief cathyfox.com and gailallen.com but Sue Arrigo posted more long rants about being tortured by Barrack Obama and is still a high level CIA operative and predsidential model. Her own sister posted under the comments apologizing that she is not well and has severe schizophrenia and doesn't take her medications and lives with her elderly mother with whom she doesn't take very good care of but has plenty of idle time on her hands for these stories. She's never even had a job let alone a high level CIA operative and presidential model. I saw her Facebook and she's an obese 60 year old woman with 1970s glasses and long straggley grey brown hair. Everytime I debunk her I'm flooded by her combative messages to prove it, many different accounts. People like this are desperate for attention seeking and take away from real research into real children being abducted, abused and killed which is what we need to focus on. This very much looks a lot like stuff she would say that I read on Conspiracy Theory on her postings and the Florida-Toronto connection is a big red flag it may be her also. Further, the 2011 timeframe is plausible as she's been at this for years. I'm not totally discounting these Twitter leads yet but I'm 50/50 and she is very suspect to me at is point. @Millennial_Falcon
Ang68 ago
You sound like a disinformationist to me.
Truthseeker3000 ago
Nice try. Look up what I wrote and verify it all for yourself. But you already know I'm sure.