I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful.
I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets.
Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!
Don't believe ANYONE - always ask for proveable facts.
In this case: the woman must be found, her identity checked and interviewed.
I don't see that it's worthy of a disinfo warning. Obviously any information can be wrong, but there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post. Could Twitter have created all of these accounts and backdated them? Possibly, but honestly, it's not likely.
I don't see why they'd split it up into all of these different accounts. Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time. There are also deleted/suspended accounts, which would be another level of them to go to in order to fake.
there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post.
This person (if this isn't a disinfo shill doing an act) is clearly mentally ill. I hope you can see how promoting the ramblings of a crazy person as evidence is potentially dangerous to our credibility. We need to be careful with this one.
Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time.
Sounds a lot like schizophrenia. It's possible that her experiences made her crazy, as she claims, but we still need to be careful.
Oh, so now you're a medical expert that can diagnose illnesses. Okay. We need to be careful with ALL information, not just this information. But you don't put "possible disinfo" with all other posts.
EDIT: And I stress, you have absolutely NO evidence Twitter made all this up and backdated it. The fact that this goes all the way back to 2010 says a lot. Again, maybe she's making it all up, but anything can be wrong, and you have no evidence this is more likely to be wrong. In fact, an Australian officer on Reddit said that he doesn't even think she's mentally ill.
Oh you know, the "concern trolling" of you mislabeling everything and deleting good information. Then when I post about mods abusing power in the other pizzagate subverse you don't even look at it. Stop abusing your power. I also love the irony of you using the "possible disinfo" as evidence that it's possible disinfo. lol That irony is not lost on me.
Common sense would dictate that you didn't need to flair it. And don't lie to me. You flaired it on your own. It had nothing to do with concerns of others.
Did I want to flair it already? Yes. But I did not do so without strong evidence of agreement from the community. My comment that you first replied to was a reply to this one: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1654349/8088456
"WARNING! I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful. I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets. Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!"
Currently 10 upvotes, ZERO downvotes. Now go away, lying troll.
view the rest of the comments →
leahxpearl ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104101/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne98
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104153/https://twitter.com/catherineagne97
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104339/https://twitter.com/catherineagne94
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104448/https://twitter.com/catherineagne93
https://web.archive.org/web/20170217104715/https://twitter.com/catherineagne93 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217104818/https://twitter.com/catherineagne91 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217104925/https://twitter.com/catherineagne90 http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110459/https://twitter.com/catherineagne88
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217105047/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne89
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110817/https://twitter.com/catherineagne87
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110923/https://twitter.com/catherineagne86
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217110929/https://twitter.com/catherineagne85
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111059/https://twitter.com/catherineagne84
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111214/https://twitter.com/catherineagne83
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111301/https://twitter.com/catherineagne82
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111321/https://twitter.com/catherineagne81
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111409/https://twitter.com/catherineagne80
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111450/https://twitter.com/catherineagne79
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111447/https://twitter.com/catherineagne77
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111500/https://twitter.com/catherineagne76
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111525/https://twitter.com/catherineagne75
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111647/https://twitter.com/catherineagne74
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093157/https://mobile.twitter.com/CATHERINEAGNE73
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111801/https://twitter.com/catherineagne71
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111758/https://mobile.twitter.com/CATHERINEAGNE70
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111933/https://twitter.com/catherineagne72
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217111806/https://twitter.com/catherineagne69
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112143/https://twitter.com/catherineagne67
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112756/https://twitter.com/catherineagne66
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112844/https://twitter.com/catherineagne65
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217112939/https://twitter.com/catherineagne64
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113039/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne61
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093415/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne63
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113044/https://twitter.com/catherineagne62
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113145/https://twitter.com/catherineagne60
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113157/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne59
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113251/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne58
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113314/https://twitter.com/catherineagne57
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113532/https://twitter.com/catherineagne56
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113528/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne55
http://web.archive.org/web/https://twitter.com/catherineagne53
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113700/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne54
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113707/https://twitter.com/catherineagne53
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113802/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne52
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113804/https://twitter.com/catherineagne51
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113849/https://twitter.com/catherineagne50
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217113847/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne49
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217142617/https://twitter.com/catherineagne48
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114019/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne47
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114048/https://twitter.com/catherineagne46
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114059/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne45
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114202/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne44
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114204/https://twitter.com/catherineagne43
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114307/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne42
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114310/https://twitter.com/catherineagne41
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114359/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne40
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114356/https://twitter.com/catherineagne39
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114423/https://twitter.com/catherineagne38
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114534/https://twitter.com/catherineagne37
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114537/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne36
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114645/https://twitter.com/catherineagne35
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114641/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne34
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114655/https://twitter.com/catherineagne33
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114822/https://twitter.com/catherineagne32
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114829/https://twitter.com/catherineagne31
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217114826/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne30
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115105/https://twitter.com/catherineagne29
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115108/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne28
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115101/https:/twitter.com/catherineagne27
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115355/https://twitter.com/catherineagne26
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115443/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne25
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115446/https://twitter.com/catherineagne24
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115906/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne23
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115909/https://twitter.com/catherineagne22
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120028/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne21
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217115952/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne20
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120100/https://twitter.com/catherineagne19
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120102/https://twitter.com/catherineagne18
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120106/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne17
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120227/https://twitter.com/catherineagne16
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120224/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne15
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120340/https://twitter.com/catherineagne14
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120314/https://twitter.com/catherineagne13
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120442/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne12
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093338/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne11
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120518/https://mobile.twitter.com/catherineagne10
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120603/https://twitter.com/CATfagnew
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217093503/https://mobile.twitter.com/AgnewFRANCE
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120917/https://twitter.com/francesmullin
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120836/https://twitter.com/catherinefagnew
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217120937/https://twitter.com/catheri41183970
http://web.archive.org/web/20170217121051/https://twitter.com/AGNEWmullinss
micha_ ago
WARNING!
I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful. I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets. Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!
Don't believe ANYONE - always ask for proveable facts. In this case: the woman must be found, her identity checked and interviewed.
ps: fantastic job!
Millennial_Falcon ago
Yup. Flairing with possible disinfo warning.
atheist4thecause ago
I don't see that it's worthy of a disinfo warning. Obviously any information can be wrong, but there's nothing in particular about this that warrants a special negative flair over any other post. Could Twitter have created all of these accounts and backdated them? Possibly, but honestly, it's not likely.
I don't see why they'd split it up into all of these different accounts. Also, if you look, the person starts coherent, goes offline for 3 months (as far as I can find accounts), and then comes back angry but pretty coherent. The incoherence grows over time. There are also deleted/suspended accounts, which would be another level of them to go to in order to fake.
Millennial_Falcon ago
This person (if this isn't a disinfo shill doing an act) is clearly mentally ill. I hope you can see how promoting the ramblings of a crazy person as evidence is potentially dangerous to our credibility. We need to be careful with this one.
Sounds a lot like schizophrenia. It's possible that her experiences made her crazy, as she claims, but we still need to be careful.
atheist4thecause ago
Oh, so now you're a medical expert that can diagnose illnesses. Okay. We need to be careful with ALL information, not just this information. But you don't put "possible disinfo" with all other posts.
EDIT: And I stress, you have absolutely NO evidence Twitter made all this up and backdated it. The fact that this goes all the way back to 2010 says a lot. Again, maybe she's making it all up, but anything can be wrong, and you have no evidence this is more likely to be wrong. In fact, an Australian officer on Reddit said that he doesn't even think she's mentally ill.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Stop your damn concern trolling. You want evidence she's mentally ill? SHE SAID IT HERSELF. And just read some of her damn tweets.
atheist4thecause ago
Oh you know, the "concern trolling" of you mislabeling everything and deleting good information. Then when I post about mods abusing power in the other pizzagate subverse you don't even look at it. Stop abusing your power. I also love the irony of you using the "possible disinfo" as evidence that it's possible disinfo. lol That irony is not lost on me.
Millennial_Falcon ago
I flaired it based on concerns expressed (and upvoted) by users, not to mention common sense.
atheist4thecause ago
Common sense would dictate that you didn't need to flair it. And don't lie to me. You flaired it on your own. It had nothing to do with concerns of others.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Did I want to flair it already? Yes. But I did not do so without strong evidence of agreement from the community. My comment that you first replied to was a reply to this one: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1654349/8088456
"WARNING! I don't say her tweets were fake, but we must be very careful. I think it's possible that, for example Twitter's Jack Dorsey or others, could inject such backdated Tweets. Let us jump on it, and then later reveal, that all was fake!"
Currently 10 upvotes, ZERO downvotes. Now go away, lying troll.