Yo, new poster here, just noticed something when googling voat so i could follow pizzagate, which was that one of the top 3 subforums was:
(NSFW - apparently)
https://voat.co/v/youngladies
If you havent been there, its mainly pictures of very young looking probably underage girls (look to be about 12 years on average), To me it seems to be a sharing network of young adolescent or younger girls in revealing clothing with NSFW tags, nothing illegal so far from what i have seen but to me its HIGHLY sketchy...
If these girls are all underage, then we have a serious problem. With the hammer that has been brought down on pizzagate by the establishment, it would come as no surprise if they spent some meager effort in destroying voat by accusing it of being a nest for unsavory file sharing.
I want this community to flourish and keep fighting the good fight, so i just wanted to warn about this part of voat that may compromise everything.
If i were one of these establishment pedo creeps, id deal with pizzagate by flooding its home with perverts, all they need to shut this down is a little bit of CP and its done.
Be wary of sharing a roof with this kind of content
view the rest of the comments →
goatsandbros ago
If it's illegal, it'll by the rules be deleted. If it's not illegal, just don't go there.
TBH, your post, and the supportive responses by young accounts, seems a big plastic.
ilovepussy ago
Direct hit. This post is an attempt to "Crack the shell" - Get something banned, deleted, or removed. Anything. it makes little difference what initially gets banned. Start with something everyone "should" find revolting, immoral, or repulsive, and attack. Once the egg is cracked, everything comes out. Then they go after v/niggers , v/fatpeoplehate , and ultimately anything that does not fit their narrative. Welcome to reddit.
Sneakychalupa ago
Jerking off to underage girls is repulsive. Making fun of "niggers" and fatpeople is different argument. Maybe next time try and formulate an viewpoint that doesn't revolve around strawmen to cover up your pedophile fantasies, you fucking lonely douche.
Rufireproof ago
The point is, that is exactly what happened on Reddit. They banned a similar sub on reddit first. /r/Jailbait. No one complained, because it only hurt Pedo's. Then they got rid of other subs, always targeting the low hanging fruit. "Oh, that's a blatantly racist sub. It needs to go." And a lot of average user's felt it was OK. They were only censoring "extreme content." Step by step, Reddit became what it is today: A place where a terrorist attack on American soil is removed from the front page of /r/news because it mentions the race/religion of the attacker. Political subs with huge subscriber bases are blocked from FP, because they support the "racist" candidate. (Reddit's description, not mine.) I don't personally agree with the content of /v/youngladies. Freedom of speech means that I will be exposed to opinions that differ from mine.
Sneakychalupa ago
Sorry, John Podesta, you're not getting any sympathy. There's a difference between terrorist attacks, freedom of speech, and jerking off to barely legal porn that you would erase from your HDD if your house was ever raided. You're an idiot.
Rufireproof ago
That's the point. That's how it starts. Censorship is OK, as long as it's "That weirdo over there." That's exactly how they took over Reddit. Start with the stuff that's easiest to justify, Then move on to the real targets. I personally don't care for that content, or /v/niggers for that matter. When I was deployed, I was transferred to a unit that was based out of a predominately black city. I learned quickly that skin color had little to do with a person's worth. You learn who to trust based on their actions, and on who they are. Sure, some of them fit every stereotype of ghetto trash out there. There were also whites who fit every stereotype of trailer trash you ever saw. Trash is trash. Skin color has nothing to do with it. I know that, so I don't go to /v/niggers. Same thing with /v/youngladies. I don't go there.
Since you seem to be so interested in what gets me off, I like a nice fully developed set of tits. Something big enough to wrap my hands around, and bury my face in. An ass with just the right amount of curve to be fucked doggy style, and old enough to fuck at home on my day off when the kids are at school. ;)
Sneakychalupa ago
We have similar tastes when it comes to women (the doggystyle part especially) fair enough. It was a presumptuous comment. Please enlighten me though. I fail to understand how freedom of speech correlates to 30-40 year old men jerking their 3 inch dicks off to 15 year old jailbait (not legal by the way.) Jailbait is not legal, if you were found with lewd pictures of children on your computer before being raided by the police, you would delete them. Regardless, these are the types of people who need to be called out and eradicated. It's not ethically or even "manly" to be fantasizing about girls who haven't even graduated the 11th grade.
Rufireproof ago
I'm assuming you are in the US. You would probably be shocked at what's legal. A long time ago, I ran a Bullitin Board System (BBS) It was a dialup, that you dialed directly with your modem. This was before Compuserve and AOL. I had a file sharing section, with an 18+ subsection. Some asshole forgot that you had to send me a picture of your driver's license to access the 18+ section. He uploaded nude pics of kids. I contacted the local police, who sent me to the FBI, as they had no one experienced with computer crimes. FBI informed me the images were technically legal. As long as they aren't in sexual poses and there is no sexual activity going on, it's legal. The law was written that way after some mom took pics of her daughters having a pillow fight in their underwear, and either almost went to jail, or actually went to jail for it. I don't remember.
To be honest, that sub is pretty mild. The internet is full of perfectly legal images of nude kids you can find with google. I agree that it's sick, but if you make the law broad enough to catch everybody who's bad, you inevitably get some who aren't. American justice system is set up to error on the side of the innocent. The founding fathers would rather a guilty man walk than an innocent go to jail.
A better way, rather than censoring, is to make sure that /v/niggers and /youngladies are a smaller percentage of Voat by posting more frequently in other areas. I still have to go to Reddit for CSGO news, and Skyrim mods. There are subs for them here, but if it isn't politics Voat isn't interested, and the subs are dead.
Sneakychalupa ago
Thanks for the in-depth reply. I got a bit carried away. I've been a victim of sexual abuse myself, as my girlfriend. It's a tender topic, and seeing people on this board who claim to be "against pedophilia and rape" advocating sexualized 12-16 year olds is sick. The age of consent is 12 in a lot of places though, which is even more disturbing. Anyway, thank you for giving me your perspective. You're right that we can't just start censoring things that are "technically" legal. My moral code is relatively slim (animals, and children). Anything else is fair game for me, but that's subjective. The story about the cunts sending you nude pictures of kids was enlightening, I hope those fucks were caught for something else perhaps down the line.
-cheers.
Rufireproof ago
Thanks for a civilized discussion. They did watch him pretty closely after that. I tried to upvoat your posts, but it denies it, saying they are archived.
Sneakychalupa ago
Any time, brotha. I may have deleted it. I got pretty butthurt (no pun). There are a few clearly paid shills in this comment section, and I think I was responding to one or two of them when I should have just been ignoring it.