You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

goatsandbros ago

If it's illegal, it'll by the rules be deleted. If it's not illegal, just don't go there.

TBH, your post, and the supportive responses by young accounts, seems a big plastic.

Sneakychalupa ago

The pedophile, goatsandbros can downvote me all he likes, it's obvious what your agenda is. Please, keep fapping to those boards. Give me your first name, and I'll be happy to dox you to the FBI.

goatsandbros ago

lol you forgot to switch back to the account you used to make the post, dude.

Sneakychalupa ago

You're a moron. I'm not the OP. I'm looking up your info though. If you're clean no big deal, right? We'll see.

goatsandbros ago

OK ok, don't hurt me pwease! Here's my name: https://imgoat.com/uploads/ccbc87e4b5/2762.png

Sneakychalupa ago

Nice stale meme. That'll make it easier.

goatsandbros ago

Thanks! Also, if you want to ping someone on Voat, use the "@" symbol, followed by their name.

Like: @Sneakychalupa has a big nasty fupa.

Sneakychalupa ago

Jesus christ, this fucking board is more cancerous than reddit. Please slit your wrists vertically, and cum inside your own eye-sockets. "Fupa" have fucking old are you again? I thought I was the young one.

Sneakychalupa ago

"If it's illegal it'll get deleted." It's funny how much faith you have in an online message board. It's illegal to rape children, and murder them, yet it still happens globally. Nice argument though! I'll see you next time on "Smarter than a 5th Grader."

goatsandbros ago

And, since President Trump has taken office, more than a thousand sick fucking pedo human-trash scumbag cuntlugger faggots have been arrested -- "deleted," irl, if you will. It'll keep happening, regardless of who pees on Voat's wall.

Sneakychalupa ago

If only Trump's administration focused on lowlife losers, we'd be free of both. I know you're really slow, so I'll break it down, YOU'RE A FUCKING WEIRDO. How old are you even?

goatsandbros ago

If only Trump's administration focused on lowlife losers, we'd be free of both.

"Both?" Both of what? What are you even talking about?

ilovepussy ago

TBH, your post, and the supportive responses by young accounts, seems a big plastic.

Direct hit. This post is an attempt to "Crack the shell" - Get something banned, deleted, or removed. Anything. it makes little difference what initially gets banned. Start with something everyone "should" find revolting, immoral, or repulsive, and attack. Once the egg is cracked, everything comes out. Then they go after v/niggers , v/fatpeoplehate , and ultimately anything that does not fit their narrative. Welcome to reddit.

FriesischShipping ago

we shouldn't demand to censor anything, if it's illegal, the authorities should use it and arrest the perps and find the victims and if they won't, we will. Censoring is stupid, think of how much evidence we've lost because Alefantis and crew decided to censor themselves and deleted their accounts.

Sneakychalupa ago

Jerking off to underage girls is repulsive. Making fun of "niggers" and fatpeople is different argument. Maybe next time try and formulate an viewpoint that doesn't revolve around strawmen to cover up your pedophile fantasies, you fucking lonely douche.

ilovepussy ago

There ya go. First rule of dissention, attack the offender. Distract from the issue by attacking the character of the offender. Why don't you try and defend your position instead of attempting to discount my views based on a false assumption. And a bit of advice on the topic; name calling and cursing make you look weak, immature, and vindictive. It does not help your argument.

To belay your concerns, I am not attracted to kids, and I too agree that it is repulsive. Some would say immoral, or revolting. Oh wait, I said that. Riddle me this batmanpersonkin? What comes after v/youngladies ? I am sure if you search around on voat you'll find even more subs that are repulsive, immoral, nay revolting. Who gets to decide what stays and what goes? You? That's not how this works.

The litmus test must be the ISP and the country in which voat is hosted. As long as voat abides by these rules, anything, regardless of the content, should be allowed.

Sneakychalupa ago

First of all, I'm a victim of molestation. Second of all, you're the worlds biggest vagina if you're saying that "cursing" degrades your viewpoints on the FUCKING INTERNET. This isn't a college thesis, this isn't a newspaper column (whatever that means nowadays), this isn't a speech to be performed, it's a fucking comment section on a relatively unknown board. Get off your high horse, you fucking pansy.

Regardless, I've had several people engage in more coherent discussions about this topic already. Your reply is midtier, but I'll take it as a civil truce. This is clearly a tender topic for me, and it should be a tender topic for anyone on this subverse. I got carried away commenting against some of the people who are clearly lonely cucks who have only had sex with overweight whales. @goatsandbros.

I agree with a lot of what you said, but next time, don't pull the white knight card on the internet. Adapt a sense of humor, mix shitposts into your viewpoints (like most of us do) and you're golden.

Rufireproof ago

The point is, that is exactly what happened on Reddit. They banned a similar sub on reddit first. /r/Jailbait. No one complained, because it only hurt Pedo's. Then they got rid of other subs, always targeting the low hanging fruit. "Oh, that's a blatantly racist sub. It needs to go." And a lot of average user's felt it was OK. They were only censoring "extreme content." Step by step, Reddit became what it is today: A place where a terrorist attack on American soil is removed from the front page of /r/news because it mentions the race/religion of the attacker. Political subs with huge subscriber bases are blocked from FP, because they support the "racist" candidate. (Reddit's description, not mine.) I don't personally agree with the content of /v/youngladies. Freedom of speech means that I will be exposed to opinions that differ from mine.

Sneakychalupa ago

Sorry, John Podesta, you're not getting any sympathy. There's a difference between terrorist attacks, freedom of speech, and jerking off to barely legal porn that you would erase from your HDD if your house was ever raided. You're an idiot.

Rufireproof ago

That's the point. That's how it starts. Censorship is OK, as long as it's "That weirdo over there." That's exactly how they took over Reddit. Start with the stuff that's easiest to justify, Then move on to the real targets. I personally don't care for that content, or /v/niggers for that matter. When I was deployed, I was transferred to a unit that was based out of a predominately black city. I learned quickly that skin color had little to do with a person's worth. You learn who to trust based on their actions, and on who they are. Sure, some of them fit every stereotype of ghetto trash out there. There were also whites who fit every stereotype of trailer trash you ever saw. Trash is trash. Skin color has nothing to do with it. I know that, so I don't go to /v/niggers. Same thing with /v/youngladies. I don't go there.

Since you seem to be so interested in what gets me off, I like a nice fully developed set of tits. Something big enough to wrap my hands around, and bury my face in. An ass with just the right amount of curve to be fucked doggy style, and old enough to fuck at home on my day off when the kids are at school. ;)

Sneakychalupa ago

We have similar tastes when it comes to women (the doggystyle part especially) fair enough. It was a presumptuous comment. Please enlighten me though. I fail to understand how freedom of speech correlates to 30-40 year old men jerking their 3 inch dicks off to 15 year old jailbait (not legal by the way.) Jailbait is not legal, if you were found with lewd pictures of children on your computer before being raided by the police, you would delete them. Regardless, these are the types of people who need to be called out and eradicated. It's not ethically or even "manly" to be fantasizing about girls who haven't even graduated the 11th grade.

Rufireproof ago

I'm assuming you are in the US. You would probably be shocked at what's legal. A long time ago, I ran a Bullitin Board System (BBS) It was a dialup, that you dialed directly with your modem. This was before Compuserve and AOL. I had a file sharing section, with an 18+ subsection. Some asshole forgot that you had to send me a picture of your driver's license to access the 18+ section. He uploaded nude pics of kids. I contacted the local police, who sent me to the FBI, as they had no one experienced with computer crimes. FBI informed me the images were technically legal. As long as they aren't in sexual poses and there is no sexual activity going on, it's legal. The law was written that way after some mom took pics of her daughters having a pillow fight in their underwear, and either almost went to jail, or actually went to jail for it. I don't remember.

To be honest, that sub is pretty mild. The internet is full of perfectly legal images of nude kids you can find with google. I agree that it's sick, but if you make the law broad enough to catch everybody who's bad, you inevitably get some who aren't. American justice system is set up to error on the side of the innocent. The founding fathers would rather a guilty man walk than an innocent go to jail.

A better way, rather than censoring, is to make sure that /v/niggers and /youngladies are a smaller percentage of Voat by posting more frequently in other areas. I still have to go to Reddit for CSGO news, and Skyrim mods. There are subs for them here, but if it isn't politics Voat isn't interested, and the subs are dead.

Sneakychalupa ago

Thanks for the in-depth reply. I got a bit carried away. I've been a victim of sexual abuse myself, as my girlfriend. It's a tender topic, and seeing people on this board who claim to be "against pedophilia and rape" advocating sexualized 12-16 year olds is sick. The age of consent is 12 in a lot of places though, which is even more disturbing. Anyway, thank you for giving me your perspective. You're right that we can't just start censoring things that are "technically" legal. My moral code is relatively slim (animals, and children). Anything else is fair game for me, but that's subjective. The story about the cunts sending you nude pictures of kids was enlightening, I hope those fucks were caught for something else perhaps down the line.

-cheers.

Rufireproof ago

Thanks for a civilized discussion. They did watch him pretty closely after that. I tried to upvoat your posts, but it denies it, saying they are archived.

Sneakychalupa ago

Any time, brotha. I may have deleted it. I got pretty butthurt (no pun). There are a few clearly paid shills in this comment section, and I think I was responding to one or two of them when I should have just been ignoring it.

Catchthem ago

Very strange response.. You seem to like it.

goatsandbros ago

It's a strange response to want to follow the rules?

Also, since I'm pretty sure you're actually OP, how do you "just notice" obscure subverses? Before your post, I didn't even know they existed, and I've been here nearly 2 years.

Catchthem ago

Whats OP? I am only on Voat to dig into Pizzagate.. So YES this comes as a complete surprise.

Aaanndgo ago

I'm not sure on these two posters' motives however Google is returning it front and centre in a search result. https://i.imgsafe.org/4400739efd.png

I suspect this will be a problem today now that this has been pointed out and now linked to our sub.

goatsandbros ago

So it could be some kind of poisoning, then.

After all the shill wars that have happened lately, one gets a feel for this sort of thing, and this stinks to high heaven.

Cucks will not divide us!