I've seen some of this before but not all of it, I'm shocked about the Jo Cox connection that's very intriguing. Can I just say though that none of this should surprise anyone, all charity no matter what it is for is a scam in the same way that tipping waiters is a scam. Apparently tipping originated from a waiters strike over low wages which prompted people to offer them small amounts of money to avert the strike and thus salvage their dinner plans, now we all just voluntarily make their wages up to a decent living for no reason. Charity is the exact same process, ask yourself why we should pay for cancer research while pharmaceutical companies make billions in profit from existing cancer treatment? The law could compel them to spend a portion of their profit on research but we are all stupid enough to think it's our responsibility. The government uses our taxes to bomb the fuck out of Syria and then the ads appear on tv telling us to give money to the starving injured children. cash crops cause famine in Africa? Don't worry we just need £2 a month from u to fix it, forget that those crops made a massive profit for some multinational corporation (also partly at your expense) just give us a small amount of money and you won't have to feel guilty for their suffering while you scoff the chocolate and drink the coffee they grew for you. The whole process is ridiculous even if they were completely virtuous organizations and every penny we gave to them went to the people who need it, it would still be ridiculous the fact that they are corrupt is almost immaterial.

Ok another person to check - Andrew Mitchell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Mitchell - he's the guy from the picture with Justin Forsyth.

Mitchell visited countries throughout the developing world to establish in detail how aid could be most effectively and fairly delivered. He visited a number of countries in Africa and Asia containing some of the worst poverty in the world, such as Sierra Leone, Ghana, Ethiopia, Chad, Eritrea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, Kenya, Thailand, Cambodia and Burma (The Republic of the Union of Myanmar). In many of these places, he created video reports detailing local conditions and some of the NGO projects aimed at ameliorating them. Whilst in Burma, Mitchell challenged its Government by raising evidence of systematic human rights abuses in the country, and its continued imprisonment of opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi. He also emphasised the need to provide rapid and substantial aid to the victims of the 2010 Haiti earthquake.

He called the british parliament to make Syria a no-fly zone, which as many understand it - would equal starting a WWIII with Russia https://off-guardian.org/2016/10/11/is-andrew-mitchell-mp-really-suggesting-we-start-wwiii/ - mind you that's the same position that Hillary Clinton held throughout the presidential debates.

Also it seems like Hillary Clinton and Andrew Mitchell are in touch - she gets updates on him from Sid Bluemental ( https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/19345 ) and Cheryll Mills ( https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/26720 )

They push for the same solutions (even though he's a conservative and she's a democrat) in their countries and they're both involved in Haiti. Seems like something worth looking deeper into.

Here's another story regarding Save the Children: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/aug/10/the-nauru-files-2000-leaked-reports-reveal-scale-of-abuse-of-children-in-australian-offshore-detention

http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/26-former-nauru-detention-centre-workers-turn-whistleblowers/7718232

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/aug/10/former-save-the-children-workers-say-nauru-files-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg

So some of the former Save The Children workers turned whistleblowers and revealed the extend of abuse that happens on Nauru island (small island that is completely dependant on Australian aid and serves basically as one big detention center). The former charity workers said most of the abuse is directed toward children and what was revealed is only 'the tip of an iceberg'.

So apparently the workers that lifted the lid on what's going on on the island were expelled from it and after that the Australlian government has paid them... around 1 milion dollars in compensation just for that. http://www.news.com.au/national/politics/deported-nauru-save-the-children-charity-workers-offered-1-million-compensation/news-story/114eeabcc79b877ff3232e9870aa5a1a

So how come they revealed the abuse and after that they were the ones that were compensated, not the victims? Or maybe that was a bribe to keep them silent about the rest of the iceberg?

Yeah, chilling. Very sad, and I think surely the vast majority (?) are probably sincere. There were many sincere Hillary supporters who became disillusioned (not to be partisan here). Let's hope it's this way in military, law enforcement, and intelligence. Thanks for your good info btw.

There's always many sincere, ideological minded individuals involved, no doubt. They have good motives.

There appears to be no altruism left. These executives have their snouts so deep in the trough. I'm beginning to think there are no decent people in power.

OP, CAFOD in the UK is who you want to check out most. Trust me on this. Too long for me to spell everything out now but when I have more time in the near future, Ill put together a synopsis.

That Pakistani vaccine psy op done by the CIA is just incredible. but everything they do is remarkable in its depravity.

Unfortunately, PG is only a small part of the whole picture, going by what George Webb has shown in his daily videos. A good place to start for newbies, is Day 109, Part 1, which gives a good summary. (he has already mentioned World Vision being involved).

I check alt news like alternet, Alex Jones, antimedia, greenmedinfo, activistpost, Twitter, reddit, liveleak, koreatimes online, democracynow, stefan molyneux, mike rivero etc The reddit site sucks but for me it went to shit some months back with heavy censorship, leading me to twitter & voat's conspiracy topics

Save the Children/World Vision is CIA.

Chapman, killer of Lennon, is linked to Save the Children, and Chapman is linked to British Intelligence and CIA (Lennon was killed by Chapman for other reasons besides subterfuge of the USA ... British intelligence was involved w/ the McCartney replacement).

Hinkley worked for Save the Children, and Hinkley (close friend of the Bush's, who are known CIA), is the father of the kid (the "black sheep of the family") who shot Reagan.

And then there's Jim Jones:

"Jones had been contacted in Ukiah by 'Christian missionaries' from World Vision (World Vision is a CIA controlled front operation), an evangelical order which had performed espionage work for the CIA in Southeast Asia."

The long-winded but fascinating (and still relatively obscure) documentary "Evidence of Revision" explains convincingly the Jim Jones CIA connection. Even Mark Lane was down there when it all went down (Mark Lane is an interesting guy, RIP), even a US congressman was killed.

These charities are wolves in sheep clothing. It's all CIA and intelligence. And they're exploiting children. If these comments are too far out and off-putting I will take them down, no problem. I don't want to obstruct any serious investigators.

Edit: For my sources (most of them) see the OP's blog that was posted/sourced:

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/save-children-front-for-cia.html

Not a far stretch. Much public propaganda effort was directed toward the phrase "save the children" through the last century's history (i.e., not only factually as a history compilation of the agency, but also as rhetoric in university-level social services and education programs).

You'll want to add UNICEF and USAID :)

A lot of NGOs are fronts. $cientology is used to inject operatives into a country under "religious workers"...I'd say that all of them have dual purposes. They do help some kids. They'd have to in order to survive..however the NGOs are used to move assets around and they pluck whatever they wish from the "inventory" who's gonna miss a few kids.

Interesting trail. I encountered Save the Children during earlier research. They are connected to Innocents at Risk and its founder Deborah Sigmund and also to the THEARC project in DC on which I posted here.

Ok here's another weird 'coincidence': another person that worked and was fired for inappropriate behaviour from Save the Children was Brendan Cox - husband of that lady Jo Cox that was murdered right before Brexit. http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=135177 Brendan Cox worked at Save the Children as a Director of policy and advocacy, also had been a senior advisor to then Prime Minister Gordon Brown AND had worked for Oxfam as senior press oficer. So again - a mixture of politics, Oxfam and Save the children as professional experience.

No stretch, anything such as this deserves a good look. In the past month the investigation has gone some places I never thought so I don't think anything is off the table.

yes. you missed the big picture: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1491256

I think this is very important. Maybe I will get back w/ a few comments. I think this needs to be upvoated bigly.

Not a stretch! I had StC Pakistan in a list of potential leads because iirc the timing coincided with the bin Laden raid, the official story of which is of course a fake vaccination program identified his location and that was the reason they got kicked out and the doctor still in jail supposedly.

I think you are exactly right on.