So I've been looking into different foundations, organisations and adoption agencies that use the pedo symbolism from the FBI report ( like this one:http://cruzadaporlosninos.org/en/ ) or that were caught and closed for giving the children in adoption to pedofiles ( http://www.eaci.com/ ) - I think international adoptions need more investigation. Then I stumbled upon this blog post from 2012:

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/save-children-front-for-cia.html

The author claimed that Save the children, Oxfam and World Vision are all fronts for intelligence agencies CIA and MI6. So I thought I'd check them out with the Wikileaks and actually there might be something to it.

SAVE THE CHILDREN - both Hillary Clinton ( https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/23614 ) and John Podesta ( https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52868 ) seem to be involved with them. Here's a quote:

"As several of my international colleagues from the Save the Children organization joined me in Washington last week to talk about how we can expand our work for children, the worldwide influence of the U.S. was clear: when America takes the lead on global development and children's rights, its actions ripple favorably across the globe. The world is only getting smaller. Decisions made in one country will affect children for the better or for the worse half a world away. We must continue to make the argument that if we want to protect the rights of any one child, we must protect the rights of all children."

And if you look into it there's some fishy stuff going on with this organisation. Pakistan basically threw them out of the county: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/12/pakistan-shuts-down-save-the-children-offices-in-islamabad

“There were some intelligence reports suggesting some of the international NGOs funded by US, Israel and India were involved in working on an anti-Pakistan agenda,”

So apparently CIA was accused of secretly killing Pakistani children with vaccines by pretending to be Save the Children workers - that's why the whole organisation was banned from the country.

They were also refused the permission to enter Syria: http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-09-25/save-the-children-blocked-from-syria/ http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09/25/syrias-children-tortured-conflict-save-children_n_1911604.html yet they still entered it.

It's interesting to note that people on top positions seem to be moving between Save The Children, Oxfam and the politics. Jasmine Whitbread - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasmine_Whitbread She first worked for Oxfam, then was the CEO of Save the Children International. Charity sure seems to be paying well: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2550648/Fury-234-000-salary-boss-Save-Children-Charity-chiefs-huge-wages-reined-say-MPs.html

Justin Forsyth - https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Justin_Forsyth also started at Oxfam first, then was appointed as a special adviser to Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. After that he replaced Jasmine Whitbread as a CEO of Save the Children - from which position he was fired for 'inappropriate behaviour' - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298572/New-charity-scandal-Save-Children-executive-quits-women-s-complaints-inappropriate-behaviour.html Now he is a Deputy Executive Director of UNICEF and UN Assistant Secretary-General.

The position of CEO of the organisation is now taken by Helle Thorning-Schmidt - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helle_Thorning-Schmidt former danish prime minister.

I'm not saying that I know for a fact that these 3 organisations: Save the children, Oxfam and World Vision are secretly involved in trafficking children but I do think this should be carefully investigated. There's a ton of emails on Wikileaks where they're mentioned and I cannot read them all by myself.

What do you guys think? Is it too much of a stretch? What if they really are, as was claimed by the author of that blog post, just fronts for intelligence agencies such as CIA and MI6? What if that's how they manage to keep everything a secret for so long?