Don't forget that the podesta e-mails which is in the multiple 10 thousands (was it around 35.000 emails?), the first 8 e-mails are scattered between a period of 10 years. Then the frequent e-mails begin at 4 may 2007, with often multiple emails per day.

Madeleine disappeared 3 may 2007, so it's likely that an e-mail wipe took place.

I think it's certain that madeleine is dead. I think it's possible that she wasn't intended to die, that she was entertainment for the podesta's (though to be unaware of while sedated by her parents, who are both anesthetists). Since the older children were most likely anesthetised (they didn't wake during the whole ruckus with police. Mccann's confirmed that they thought they must be drugged, however they were not worried, despite anesthesia being rather dangerous, particularly if you don't know the dose or the method. The fact that they weren't worried and that it is their expertise means it's most likely them who drugged their children and probably madeleine too.

Maybe it was a mistake and they gave her too much. Maybe they had to pay their child's life for whatever reason. She's dead, but whether it was intentional or accidental is uncertain. That it is criminal and malevolent is beyond question. And that podesta is involved is likely, considering that multiple sources have claimed law enforcement contacts that confirmed that podesta was in portugal at the time (including david seaman), that podesta were friends with clement freud, who was later convicted for soliciting a minor, that clement freud's mansion was nearby, that the efit pictures match what the podesta's look like.

The one thing that I wonder about still... the efit pictures were made not by the police but a private detective agency hired by the mccann's. Not only that, but it was a washington based agency, which is strange. That this produced the images that looked like the podesta's is also strange; was this their insurance against the podesta's somehow?