Wait...you're citing the writings of someone who died in 18 AD? Maybe we should try parting the Red Sea as well.
C'mon, this has as much to do with Jews as Podesta does by Italians, or whatever the phuck he is.
And the Wikileaks prove jack shit as well. Nothing but a bunch of spam and listservs. But, by the same philosophy, it probably means you have a tiny wiener based on the spam in your inbox.
These aren't Jews. They are progressives lefties looking for a place to park a "religion" which conforms to their moral compass. Not the other way around.
And someone citing Dailystormer as a references? Please - those morons wouldn't know the difference between MLA and APA citation style.
"Jewish problem".... where have I heard that before?
It's the Talmud first of all and is the book that is still revered and read by differing degrees by Jews today just as Christians (and Jews) still hold the books of the OT as valid and interpret it literally where literal interpretations are valid and metaphorically where metaphors are being used... The OT is much older yet we hold it just as valid... so if a book written by a man in 18 AD is still in the Talmud and has sadistic writings condoning child rape, why don't reformed Jews get together and just remove it?
And source to wikileaks being jack shit? That is one of the most ignorant misguided claims I have heard of. Not even HRC herself has claimed this.
What are you fucking stupid? I said nothing of WikiLeaks being fake you moron. Your comment has no logic. No substance. And what is that list you fucking pansy turd? Is that you're 'proof' every ones a shill. Grow up.
Your claim makes no logical sense. You have nothing but attacks. If you're investigating Pizzagate, I don't hate you. But don't hate others who know more than you.
Dude you replied in a total misunderstanding.... I wasn't even responding to your comment, I was responding to Blacksmith21, and I originally tagged you in the comment b/c I thought you'd be interested... HOLY FUCK...
So when you responded immediately attacking me I figured you were an alter of blacksmith21 b/c there was no need for you to attack me considering you agree with my position on this issue.
Are you really this much of a neophyte to not understand I am tagging you in a comment that I'm directly responding to from Blacksmith21?
Pizzagate is serious stuff. Shillery is serious stuff. DO NOT ACCUSE anyone of shillery (especially -- I didn't deserve it, and others can see these names and accusations associated) unless you intend to provide the onus of proof. Again, if you're investigating pizzagate, good. But if you disagree with someone, don't be so quick to divide. I was not attacking, I was defending. Cheers.
I never even claimed you were a shill (I only said it after you claimed I called you one), where the hell are you getting this from?.... thanks for ignoring the fact that I never even was responding to your comment but to Blacksmith and thinking it was you I was responding to originally.
Listen, I am not responsible if YOU were confused by the comments. It is YOUR responsibility to provide proof if you make a claim. Simple. YOU listed my screen name specifically. YOU provided no evidence. And I am the neophyte? On the contrary, YOU are the Cretan. No further correspondence.
I originally tore into the guy thinking he was accusing me of being shillacious. Turns out, he had merely included me through tagging (at bottom of message). It was confusing because I didn't see the intended recipient's message, as it was before mine. Perhaps this is happening on your end, I don't know. I say that because I noticed he tagged you earlier. I swear, the older I get, the less I know.
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
Wait...you're citing the writings of someone who died in 18 AD? Maybe we should try parting the Red Sea as well.
C'mon, this has as much to do with Jews as Podesta does by Italians, or whatever the phuck he is.
And the Wikileaks prove jack shit as well. Nothing but a bunch of spam and listservs. But, by the same philosophy, it probably means you have a tiny wiener based on the spam in your inbox.
These aren't Jews. They are progressives lefties looking for a place to park a "religion" which conforms to their moral compass. Not the other way around.
And someone citing Dailystormer as a references? Please - those morons wouldn't know the difference between MLA and APA citation style.
"Jewish problem".... where have I heard that before?
ich1baN ago
It's the Talmud first of all and is the book that is still revered and read by differing degrees by Jews today just as Christians (and Jews) still hold the books of the OT as valid and interpret it literally where literal interpretations are valid and metaphorically where metaphors are being used... The OT is much older yet we hold it just as valid... so if a book written by a man in 18 AD is still in the Talmud and has sadistic writings condoning child rape, why don't reformed Jews get together and just remove it?
And source to wikileaks being jack shit? That is one of the most ignorant misguided claims I have heard of. Not even HRC herself has claimed this.
@kekistocrat @hagen1
kekistocrat ago
What are you fucking stupid? I said nothing of WikiLeaks being fake you moron. Your comment has no logic. No substance. And what is that list you fucking pansy turd? Is that you're 'proof' every ones a shill. Grow up.
ich1baN ago
Wow, you have an alter account, you forgot to logout of your kekistocrat account before responding LOL.. FUCKING SHILL.
kekistocrat ago
Your claim makes no logical sense. You have nothing but attacks. If you're investigating Pizzagate, I don't hate you. But don't hate others who know more than you.
ich1baN ago
Dude you replied in a total misunderstanding.... I wasn't even responding to your comment, I was responding to Blacksmith21, and I originally tagged you in the comment b/c I thought you'd be interested... HOLY FUCK...
So when you responded immediately attacking me I figured you were an alter of blacksmith21 b/c there was no need for you to attack me considering you agree with my position on this issue.
Are you really this much of a neophyte to not understand I am tagging you in a comment that I'm directly responding to from Blacksmith21?
kekistocrat ago
Pizzagate is serious stuff. Shillery is serious stuff. DO NOT ACCUSE anyone of shillery (especially -- I didn't deserve it, and others can see these names and accusations associated) unless you intend to provide the onus of proof. Again, if you're investigating pizzagate, good. But if you disagree with someone, don't be so quick to divide. I was not attacking, I was defending. Cheers.
ich1baN ago
I never even claimed you were a shill (I only said it after you claimed I called you one), where the hell are you getting this from?.... thanks for ignoring the fact that I never even was responding to your comment but to Blacksmith and thinking it was you I was responding to originally.
kekistocrat ago
Listen, I am not responsible if YOU were confused by the comments. It is YOUR responsibility to provide proof if you make a claim. Simple. YOU listed my screen name specifically. YOU provided no evidence. And I am the neophyte? On the contrary, YOU are the Cretan. No further correspondence.
VieBleu ago
this one has been harrassing me too - may want to downvote it's comments in it's submissions.
kekistocrat ago
I originally tore into the guy thinking he was accusing me of being shillacious. Turns out, he had merely included me through tagging (at bottom of message). It was confusing because I didn't see the intended recipient's message, as it was before mine. Perhaps this is happening on your end, I don't know. I say that because I noticed he tagged you earlier. I swear, the older I get, the less I know.
VieBleu ago
true - and the more we find out, the less we seem to know in a way too.