Wait...you're citing the writings of someone who died in 18 AD? Maybe we should try parting the Red Sea as well.
C'mon, this has as much to do with Jews as Podesta does by Italians, or whatever the phuck he is.
And the Wikileaks prove jack shit as well. Nothing but a bunch of spam and listservs. But, by the same philosophy, it probably means you have a tiny wiener based on the spam in your inbox.
These aren't Jews. They are progressives lefties looking for a place to park a "religion" which conforms to their moral compass. Not the other way around.
And someone citing Dailystormer as a references? Please - those morons wouldn't know the difference between MLA and APA citation style.
"Jewish problem".... where have I heard that before?
It's the Talmud first of all and is the book that is still revered and read by differing degrees by Jews today just as Christians (and Jews) still hold the books of the OT as valid and interpret it literally where literal interpretations are valid and metaphorically where metaphors are being used... The OT is much older yet we hold it just as valid... so if a book written by a man in 18 AD is still in the Talmud and has sadistic writings condoning child rape, why don't reformed Jews get together and just remove it?
And source to wikileaks being jack shit? That is one of the most ignorant misguided claims I have heard of. Not even HRC herself has claimed this.
What are you fucking stupid? I said nothing of WikiLeaks being fake you moron. Your comment has no logic. No substance. And what is that list you fucking pansy turd? Is that you're 'proof' every ones a shill. Grow up.
Remember, all of your useless diatribe amounts to nothing when you provide no proof or your claim. There is a 'paper trail' of your idiocy and blatant contradictions.
Your claim makes no logical sense. You have nothing but attacks. If you're investigating Pizzagate, I don't hate you. But don't hate others who know more than you.
Dude you replied in a total misunderstanding.... I wasn't even responding to your comment, I was responding to Blacksmith21, and I originally tagged you in the comment b/c I thought you'd be interested... HOLY FUCK...
So when you responded immediately attacking me I figured you were an alter of blacksmith21 b/c there was no need for you to attack me considering you agree with my position on this issue.
Are you really this much of a neophyte to not understand I am tagging you in a comment that I'm directly responding to from Blacksmith21?
Pizzagate is serious stuff. Shillery is serious stuff. DO NOT ACCUSE anyone of shillery (especially -- I didn't deserve it, and others can see these names and accusations associated) unless you intend to provide the onus of proof. Again, if you're investigating pizzagate, good. But if you disagree with someone, don't be so quick to divide. I was not attacking, I was defending. Cheers.
I never even claimed you were a shill (I only said it after you claimed I called you one), where the hell are you getting this from?.... thanks for ignoring the fact that I never even was responding to your comment but to Blacksmith and thinking it was you I was responding to originally.
Listen, I am not responsible if YOU were confused by the comments. It is YOUR responsibility to provide proof if you make a claim. Simple. YOU listed my screen name specifically. YOU provided no evidence. And I am the neophyte? On the contrary, YOU are the Cretan. No further correspondence.
I originally tore into the guy thinking he was accusing me of being shillacious. Turns out, he had merely included me through tagging (at bottom of message). It was confusing because I didn't see the intended recipient's message, as it was before mine. Perhaps this is happening on your end, I don't know. I say that because I noticed he tagged you earlier. I swear, the older I get, the less I know.
LOL... I listed your username as a link to my response to BlackSmith21... bro, you need to learn how this forum thing works. In fact, if it couldn't be more clear, I put your username at the bottom of the post so it couldn't be confused... It's clear I was responding to BlackSmith21 and I tagged you b/c I wanted you to see it... that is all, not sure how you confused this lol
Where? When? The claimant has the onus of proof. You are claiming I said that bullshit. When did I? Fucking moron. Proof or you're an idiot who shows it by not backing up his claim. I MADE NO CLAIMS TO BACK UP, MORON!
The alt-right is full of well dressed, well educated, clean, respectable, above average intelligence men. Yes we have balls and conviction. Yes, we are radical. Yes, we are fanatics. Yes, we are idealists. Yes, we believe the white race is demonstrably superior to all others and destined to conquer the universe. But the alt right is not your Jewish stereotype of a bucktoothed hillbilly. You would probably be lower IQ and worse looking than the average NPI conference attendee.
This is a misinterpretation of passages in the Talmud. A deliberate misinterpretation being used to try to discredit pizzagate by associating it with anti-semitism. But you probably know that.
I don't like Zionist but I am certainly no an Anti Semite. Admittedly, I am not an expert (or even close) on the teaching of the Talmud. However, this guy seems to have a grasp on things. I will be doing more research. Let us not forget it was the Pharisees (Zionist) who gave Christ up to be crucified. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA-JCLYeDro
Almost ZERO Jews adhere to the Talmud. Suggest maybe you get off the compound in Idaho once in a while.
And, by the same logic, the Bible condones many things not acceptable today. You also need to remember, that both Christian/Jewish bibles also reference people's ages in terms of hundreds of years...like 645 or somethings like that.
It's posts like this which discredit the investigation. Mark my words, all it takes is CNN, Buzzfeed, etc. to run a slam of #pizzagate and watch them selectively pull out BA like this to feed to the masses.
About 1/4 to 1/2 of jews worldwide adhere to the talmud. Shows you are completely ignorant and uneducated in this matter to make such a false claim with so much passion. Regardless, the fact that most American Jews are secular, just proves we National Socialists are correct - Jews are born as Jews, the Talmud is just an expression of their Jewish ethnic character. Their behavior comes from their genes.
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
Wait...you're citing the writings of someone who died in 18 AD? Maybe we should try parting the Red Sea as well.
C'mon, this has as much to do with Jews as Podesta does by Italians, or whatever the phuck he is.
And the Wikileaks prove jack shit as well. Nothing but a bunch of spam and listservs. But, by the same philosophy, it probably means you have a tiny wiener based on the spam in your inbox.
These aren't Jews. They are progressives lefties looking for a place to park a "religion" which conforms to their moral compass. Not the other way around.
And someone citing Dailystormer as a references? Please - those morons wouldn't know the difference between MLA and APA citation style.
"Jewish problem".... where have I heard that before?
ich1baN ago
It's the Talmud first of all and is the book that is still revered and read by differing degrees by Jews today just as Christians (and Jews) still hold the books of the OT as valid and interpret it literally where literal interpretations are valid and metaphorically where metaphors are being used... The OT is much older yet we hold it just as valid... so if a book written by a man in 18 AD is still in the Talmud and has sadistic writings condoning child rape, why don't reformed Jews get together and just remove it?
And source to wikileaks being jack shit? That is one of the most ignorant misguided claims I have heard of. Not even HRC herself has claimed this.
@kekistocrat @hagen1
kekistocrat ago
What are you fucking stupid? I said nothing of WikiLeaks being fake you moron. Your comment has no logic. No substance. And what is that list you fucking pansy turd? Is that you're 'proof' every ones a shill. Grow up.
ich1baN ago
Wow, you have an alter account, you forgot to logout of your kekistocrat account before responding LOL.. FUCKING SHILL.
kekistocrat ago
Remember, all of your useless diatribe amounts to nothing when you provide no proof or your claim. There is a 'paper trail' of your idiocy and blatant contradictions.
kekistocrat ago
Your claim makes no logical sense. You have nothing but attacks. If you're investigating Pizzagate, I don't hate you. But don't hate others who know more than you.
ich1baN ago
Dude you replied in a total misunderstanding.... I wasn't even responding to your comment, I was responding to Blacksmith21, and I originally tagged you in the comment b/c I thought you'd be interested... HOLY FUCK...
So when you responded immediately attacking me I figured you were an alter of blacksmith21 b/c there was no need for you to attack me considering you agree with my position on this issue.
Are you really this much of a neophyte to not understand I am tagging you in a comment that I'm directly responding to from Blacksmith21?
kekistocrat ago
Pizzagate is serious stuff. Shillery is serious stuff. DO NOT ACCUSE anyone of shillery (especially -- I didn't deserve it, and others can see these names and accusations associated) unless you intend to provide the onus of proof. Again, if you're investigating pizzagate, good. But if you disagree with someone, don't be so quick to divide. I was not attacking, I was defending. Cheers.
ich1baN ago
I never even claimed you were a shill (I only said it after you claimed I called you one), where the hell are you getting this from?.... thanks for ignoring the fact that I never even was responding to your comment but to Blacksmith and thinking it was you I was responding to originally.
kekistocrat ago
Listen, I am not responsible if YOU were confused by the comments. It is YOUR responsibility to provide proof if you make a claim. Simple. YOU listed my screen name specifically. YOU provided no evidence. And I am the neophyte? On the contrary, YOU are the Cretan. No further correspondence.
VieBleu ago
this one has been harrassing me too - may want to downvote it's comments in it's submissions.
kekistocrat ago
I originally tore into the guy thinking he was accusing me of being shillacious. Turns out, he had merely included me through tagging (at bottom of message). It was confusing because I didn't see the intended recipient's message, as it was before mine. Perhaps this is happening on your end, I don't know. I say that because I noticed he tagged you earlier. I swear, the older I get, the less I know.
VieBleu ago
true - and the more we find out, the less we seem to know in a way too.
ich1baN ago
LOL... I listed your username as a link to my response to BlackSmith21... bro, you need to learn how this forum thing works. In fact, if it couldn't be more clear, I put your username at the bottom of the post so it couldn't be confused... It's clear I was responding to BlackSmith21 and I tagged you b/c I wanted you to see it... that is all, not sure how you confused this lol
kekistocrat ago
OK, I see now. I didn't see BlackSmith's comment. Blah, blah. My apologies.
ich1baN ago
LOL... No worries man, same here :)
kekistocrat ago
If you know that I typed those words, where's the proof? It should be there, right? Where the fuck is it?
kekistocrat ago
Where? When? The claimant has the onus of proof. You are claiming I said that bullshit. When did I? Fucking moron. Proof or you're an idiot who shows it by not backing up his claim. I MADE NO CLAIMS TO BACK UP, MORON!
apparatchik1488 ago
I didn't "cite" www.DailyStormer.com - I gave them a mention, a shout out.
apparatchik1488 ago
The alt-right is full of well dressed, well educated, clean, respectable, above average intelligence men. Yes we have balls and conviction. Yes, we are radical. Yes, we are fanatics. Yes, we are idealists. Yes, we believe the white race is demonstrably superior to all others and destined to conquer the universe. But the alt right is not your Jewish stereotype of a bucktoothed hillbilly. You would probably be lower IQ and worse looking than the average NPI conference attendee.
victuruslibertas ago
Zionist hurt feelings alert. LOL... Are you telling me that many Jews do not adhere to the Talmud ??? Hmm???
VieBleu ago
the hurt feelings seem to be yours. That was a reasonable reply and your comment throwing around Zionist is eye rolling ridiculous.
victuruslibertas ago
Ok
Millennial_Falcon ago
This is a misinterpretation of passages in the Talmud. A deliberate misinterpretation being used to try to discredit pizzagate by associating it with anti-semitism. But you probably know that.
http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html
victuruslibertas ago
I don't like Zionist but I am certainly no an Anti Semite. Admittedly, I am not an expert (or even close) on the teaching of the Talmud. However, this guy seems to have a grasp on things. I will be doing more research. Let us not forget it was the Pharisees (Zionist) who gave Christ up to be crucified. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA-JCLYeDro
Blacksmith21 ago
Almost ZERO Jews adhere to the Talmud. Suggest maybe you get off the compound in Idaho once in a while.
And, by the same logic, the Bible condones many things not acceptable today. You also need to remember, that both Christian/Jewish bibles also reference people's ages in terms of hundreds of years...like 645 or somethings like that.
It's posts like this which discredit the investigation. Mark my words, all it takes is CNN, Buzzfeed, etc. to run a slam of #pizzagate and watch them selectively pull out BA like this to feed to the masses.
VieBleu ago
Agree.
apparatchik1488 ago
About 1/4 to 1/2 of jews worldwide adhere to the talmud. Shows you are completely ignorant and uneducated in this matter to make such a false claim with so much passion. Regardless, the fact that most American Jews are secular, just proves we National Socialists are correct - Jews are born as Jews, the Talmud is just an expression of their Jewish ethnic character. Their behavior comes from their genes.
victuruslibertas ago
I don't deal with the OT.. Almost ZERO,???. I doubt that to be the case. Regardless, this is in regards to those that do.