"evidence that this company exist"......There's no doubt Accesso exists. But you're missing the point here. The Clinton Foundation and the IHRC are suspected of running an elaborate money laundering operation with a side of tax evasion. It's through that lens you need to view Accesso.

So the presence of a real office building there with many other registered companies is MORE evidence of fraud rather than LESS. Why? THIS IS HOW MONEY LAUNDERING AND TAX HAVENS WORK. All over the Caribbean you'll see the same sketchy office buildings where 10s even 100s of corporation reside either in a PO Box or something as big as a cubicle with one dude in it. They're all fronts for either tax evasion of money laundering.

AreWeSure do you know what the banks in Panama City are called? The Launderettes.

But there's more. If you look closely at that Google maps address you'll see the building is labelled World Bank. Sound familiar? See any red flags? No? Take a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confessions_of_an_Economic_Hit_Man

Don't have the energy to click that link? That's ok: "According to his book, Perkins' function was to convince the political and financial leadership of underdeveloped countries to accept enormous development loans from institutions like the World Bank and USAID. Saddled with debts they could not hope to pay, those countries were forced to acquiesce to political pressure from the United States on a variety of issues."

Any clearer now AreWeSure?

;-)

You are a fucking shill

I see where you are going, but it is honestly not helpful. I don't know if your intention in pointing out flaws is to help or "debunk," but you're kind of just being a jerk. You found good info there to expound on the original findings, why not present it as such instead of "everyone on this board expect me is an idiot and conspiracy nut"?
This is a mish mash collaboration of mostly average, inexperienced "investigators" and "journalists." Mistakes will be made, people will misspeak. Obviously Acesso actually exists if they dumped unwanted peanuts on Haiti.
My main take away from the original thread was, here is another example of the Clinton foundation taking part in shady, harmful dealings. Here are possible leads. That important info was conveyed just fine.
Is your point, "if I can make this strawman out of your post, anyone stumbling into pizzagate can, and dismiss it"? Because that also isn't fair, there is mountains of circumstantial evidence and "coincidences" to dig through, if the imperfection of amateurs handling the investigation is all that turns them off, they want to stay blue-pilled.
Pizzagate doesn't manufacture much of anything, and can't be expected to. There may be a big, serious breakthrough, but we're severely limited. Our best hope is to chip away at it and spread awareness, imo. I'll take a flawed post with good info over more "I found a band poster with satan on it!" type of threads.

What is the point of this?? Duh, the Haiti peanut supply chain doesn't exist ANYMORE. The dumping of free peanuts ended it, and in a bad way. That was how I interpreted the thread title, which makes it accurate. Your interpretation doesn't mean that the Clinton's are off the hook. Monica Peterson is still dead, the brother still has ties to the mining, and for all the money donated, Haiti is still a fucking mess.

You chose that as your account name and made this post because you are a shill. If you have any evidence contradicting a thread, post such evidence in that thread. Otherwise, bye Felicia.

https://archive.is/STSkz :

How the U.S.’s peanut glut could undermine the work of the Clintons - The Washington Post

This has been an automated message.

My last bit of evidence that this company exist is this washington post article from 2015 that focuses on the Clintons and Haiti. On the plus side is the work with peanut farmers and on the minus side is the Caracol Industrial Park. Here's every reference to Accesso.

Deep in the Haitian countryside, peanut farmer Wismith Moricette epitomizes the success of Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton’s charitable work: Through an innovative program backed by the Clintons, the 23-year-old has doubled the yield from his one-acre plot. Along with all those peanuts, Moricette said, have come visions of a brighter future for his wife and young son.

Fifty miles away on Haiti’s north coast, Anelle Germinal exemplifies another reality of the Clintons’ work here: disappointment. The 33-year-old mother of four has been standing in the baking sun every day for months waiting for work in the struggling Caracol Industrial Park, which the Clintons have touted as a model that would change the >economy of this impoverished country.

“They said we would have work,” Germinal said, “but I have nothing.”

Moricette and Germinal are two faces of the Clintons’ increasingly complicated relationship with Haiti, where their high-profile development efforts after a devastating earthquake in 2010 have produced both success and disillusionment. .....

When Bill Clinton came here late last month to help inaugurate the new Marriott, he made a side trip by helicopter to Haiti’s central plateau to have a look at a Clinton-backed program that is revolutionizing the peanut-farming industry.

The Acceso Peanut Enterprise Corp. was started with a $1.25 million grant from the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership, which is headed by Bill Clinton and Canadian mining executive and philanthropist Frank Giustra, as well as the charitable foundation of Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim.

Acceso buys feed, fertilizer and fungicide at bulk rates, then sells them to farmers for far less than normal prices. Acceso also hires tractors for farmers who otherwise would be using an ox and plow.

Robert Johnson, an American who runs the program, said the improvements are vastly increasing yields, quality and farmers’ profits.

He said Acceso worked with about 1,000 farmers last year and bought about 120 metric tons of peanuts. This year, it expects to triple the number of farmers and buy almost five times as much peanut tonnage.

At least half of Acceso’s sales have gone to two large Haitian factories that produce a peanut-based paste that is given to malnourished children. Most of the rest goes to local peanut-butter producers, he said. The program’s success, Johnson said, comes from its market-driven approach: It’s not a charity, it’s a business with a charitable purpose.

“We’re building something that is going to be sustainable,” he said. “We talk to the farmers. We’re not going to just bring in something that someone thought up in ­Davos.”

The program is branching out into lime-growing, and Clinton visited a site last month where thousands of seedlings are being cultivated by dozens of workers.

Benel Auguste, 32, is one of the small landowners who rented his plot, about a third of an acre, to Acceso to plant limes. “It’s a good idea; it’s going to work,” he said. “We know limes and we need them. We can do this.”

In short, if you wanted to look for evidence that Acceso Peanut Enterprise Corporation is real, it's not very hard.

Response to this shaky evidence

Even given this fact, very few people in the thread question the conclusion in the title that Accesso Peanut doesn't exist at all. A couple of people point out, hey the World Bank is there and that's a good clue. A few other folks point out that Clinton Giustra has a few Accesso companies, but agree with the conclusion that they are fronts or shady. One person went to the website and watch the video and came to the conclusion I did. The map link is the urban office and a lot of the work is closer to the crops in the rural parts of Haiti. This person agrees some exploitation is happening. *The next two people accuse this person of being a shill. *

Logical Fallacies or how we fool ourselves

The fact that subject of the thread is pratically clickbait doesn't really concern mainly of the people in it even though it's such an obvious jumping to a conclusion. That not the only conclusion jumped to. There's another conclusion jumped to, so we are up to two logical fallacies now. The other conclusion is that the "company" Accesso Peanut, notice the scare quotes has something to do with Haiti being flooded with peanuts. The implication is that Haiti being flooded with peanuts is the fault of the Clintons, or Accesso Peanut or something? It reaches this conclusion through a third logic fallacy known in Latin as Post hoc ergo propter hoc. I like to refer to it as: THIS happened. Then THAT happened. Therefore THIS caused THAT. This is one of the more popular ways to argue on the internt.

Remember, logical fallacies are a way of us fooling ourselves. This kind of makes sense: The Clintons founded a for profit peanut company in Haiti, and now peanut farmers in Haiti are struggling, thefore the Clintons caused the peanut farmers in Haiti to struggle. However when you pull it apart, it doesn't make sense at all.

One thing happened. Another thing happened. One cause the other.

I make the example more obvious to spot how illogical it is.

Prince died. Then Trump was elected President. Therefore Prince's death caused Trump's win.

Actually one thing happened a few years ago and the other within the last year so it would be something more like Robin Willaims died. Trump was Elected. Therefore Williams death caused Trump's win.

In cases like this we can see that this is completely illogical and we are fooling ourselves to say one caused the other.

An Alternative Conclusion from These Facts.

The posts links to an NPR article on the peanut glut, but that article doesn't mentioned Accesso or the Clintons' at all. In fact, it mentions who is responsible for bringing the peanut glut to Haiti, the US Department of Agriculure, not the Clinton Foundation. The NPR article does mention and link to this story on when Clinton in the 1990s pushed for Haiti to lower its tarriffs on rice. https://www.facingsouth.org/2010/03/southern-rice-and-haitian-hunger.html and cheap US rice flooded the market. That story also quotes Clinton saying that was a mistake and a bad policy.

And most importantly, if you were not looking at this from a conspiratorial point of view, you would see that Accesso is taking a much, much different approach that the USDA. They are not working in concert. They appear to working at cross purposes. Accesso's approach is to work with local farmers to increase crop yields and provide services that connect them to markets. And since they profit from this, if Haitian peanut farmers are hurt, so would they be hurt.

This is not some grand government wide conspiracy, this is the government working in silos and in ignorance working towards goals that are at cross purposes. USDA is pushing this and USAID is against this.

The hook for the NPR article on the peanut glut is this Letter against the USDA's plan from 60 aid organizations that was put out in May. Even before that letter Partners in Health put out a letter in April condemning peanut dumping in Haiti. http://www.pih.org/blog/no-to-dumping-peanuts-in-haiti

We urge that the USDA reverse its decision to send U.S. surplus peanuts to Haiti. Dumping peanuts will undermine the price local peanut farmers will receive for their goods, diminishing their ability to subsist and eliminating their livelihoods. Instead, Haiti needs humanitarian support that does not undermine the livelihoods of the rural poor.

Partners in Health, where have I have I heard of them before. Oh yeah, the Accesso Peanut Enterprise website where they are listed as a partner. http://cgepartnership.com/our-enterprises/supply/haiti-peanut/