You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Alpo ago

It is not just CNN calling Assange a pedophile; it appears to be a covert CIA plot using a proprietary organization to smear Assange: http://archive.is/zXzAW

Assange's actions are consistent with those of a non-pedophile who is falsely accused. Wikileaks has the power to retaliate.

Sentastixc ago

Indeed! This is what you do when you get accused of something like this! Silence is for the guilty!

justforthissubverse ago

Exactly true. My brother is familiar with interrogation. He once told me that for an innocent person, the usual reaction to being accused of a horrible crime, is anger. This came up because I was being accused of something I didn't do and I was incredibly angry and lashed out at my accuser, and their response to me was that "if I was innocent I wouldn't be so angry at them for accusing me" - which makes no sense of course. Normal people get angry when accused of bad shit they are innocent of doing.

the_one_tony_stark ago

That's one of the reasons I was almost certain alefantis was guilty of something shady. He didn't get angry when accused of being a pwdophile, but instead fought hard to sell a story of being a friendly guy.

Cbradio ago

Exactly, and goes on even here. Aside, is Alan Dershowitz, now an attorney for Assange? Its added on Dershowitz wikipedia?/Is that a joke that someone added?

And it is serious violations as this corp is lying to the UN, about a lot. Wikileaks did a great investigation on them and series of events. Same as Trump race accusation. The court filing, simply was judge requesting entity status of all parties; person, corp, nonprofit, how long, any past settlement history. No crime mentioned in the court filings, and no case goes through that quick, adding unec delays to legit cases that have waited a long time. Illegal..

Gaslight, isolate, outcaste, destroy. Same old tactics. Ones witness, ethics as choice is the option.

justforthissubverse ago

Seems true. This disturbs me. However, one does not hire an attorney based on the character of that attorney, but rather based on his connections and ability to get the job done. In which case Dershowitz is supremely qualified.
Still bothers me though...

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2011/02/alan-dershowitz-joins-julian-assange-defense-team-033359

Cbradio ago

Ethics wise, no and strategy wise, no. Dersh already was a conflict interest attorney forvepstein and others including royals AND got ALL of them Ofg on being later accused and charged and suchnon a court document being hidden from.the public and dersh WOULD be doing more of that elite LEGAL loophole of assange attorney..so no, dersh is not a lawyer to ever choose and dersh should legally not even be able to be a lawyer on this case..its severe conflict interest.

And as dersh is now trying to get the victims attorney to lose their hatdworked attorney license As dersh also caused many professors to.lose their jobs and tenure AS dershwon had his first severe side beaten HIDDEN as NEVER should have been allowed to have or keep a law license as that severe wife beating would not allow ones by law to have or keep a license.

Yet, idk if he is the attorney for assange or if someone put it on wikipedia as a joke..

justforthissubverse ago

I believe it was a Wikileaks tweet not wikipedia that released this info. http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2011/02/alan-dershowitz-joins-julian-assange-defense-team-033359

I can't disagree with any of your comments. Dersh should be in prison.

Cbradio ago

Oh, is there a Wiki tweets? I did not see. I found it on wikipedia as researching Dersh...but, don't know if its a joke put on wikipedia.

Sharipie ago

Assigned reaction is the exact opposite of John Pedostas.

DefenderOfTruth ago

Very good point