It is not just CNN calling Assange a pedophile; it appears to be a covert CIA plot using a proprietary organization to smear Assange: http://archive.is/zXzAW
Assange's actions are consistent with those of a non-pedophile who is falsely accused. Wikileaks has the power to retaliate.
The accusation needs not be true. It's the meme that matters. It deflects attention away from the truth. Or away from what the Oligarchs want to obscure.
Can't we do one of those online petition things even if just to spread awareness on fb. It will get those clueless to pizzagate a bait and lure to at least slowly but surely figure out "what the actual fuck is going on". What should we do? I want to go about it the right away if anyone has an idea let me know. Peace love and let's expose those cunts. Tired of these wankers pulling the veil over citizens eyes. Though I feel fb is compromised due to its artificial intelligence engine they use. So as you can imagine keywords and such; are well, you get where I'm going with this. I smoked a joint I'm not as clear as usual but ya come on let's do this shit. * ties rambo bandana around my head. *
Employers are not responsible for defamation. If I defame you, I'm responsible not my employer. Unless Assange is claiming that CNN directed him to say that as part of his job. I don't know this, but I would guess that analysts are contractors and not employees. I see a lot of clips of Phil Mudd on other networks, and some seem to overlap with his time on CNN.
Exactly true. My brother is familiar with interrogation. He once told me that for an innocent person, the usual reaction to being accused of a horrible crime, is anger.
This came up because I was being accused of something I didn't do and I was incredibly angry and lashed out at my accuser, and their response to me was that "if I was innocent I wouldn't be so angry at them for accusing me" - which makes no sense of course. Normal people get angry when accused of bad shit they are innocent of doing.
That's one of the reasons I was almost certain alefantis was guilty of something shady. He didn't get angry when accused of being a pwdophile, but instead fought hard to sell a story of being a friendly guy.
Exactly, and goes on even here.
Aside, is Alan Dershowitz, now an attorney for Assange? Its added on Dershowitz wikipedia?/Is that a joke that someone added?
And it is serious violations as this corp is lying to the UN, about a lot. Wikileaks did a great investigation on them and series of events. Same as Trump race accusation. The court filing, simply was judge requesting entity status of all parties; person, corp, nonprofit, how long, any past settlement history. No crime mentioned in the court filings, and no case goes through that quick, adding unec delays to legit cases that have waited a long time. Illegal..
Gaslight, isolate, outcaste, destroy. Same old tactics. Ones witness, ethics as choice is the option.
Seems true. This disturbs me. However, one does not hire an attorney based on the character of that attorney, but rather based on his connections and ability to get the job done. In which case Dershowitz is supremely qualified.
Still bothers me though...
Ethics wise, no and strategy wise, no. Dersh already was a conflict interest attorney forvepstein and others including royals AND got ALL of them Ofg on being later accused and charged and suchnon a court document being hidden from.the public and dersh WOULD be doing more of that elite LEGAL loophole of assange attorney..so no, dersh is not a lawyer to ever choose and dersh should legally not even be able to be a lawyer on this case..its severe conflict interest.
And as dersh is now trying to get the victims attorney to lose their hatdworked attorney license
As dersh also caused many professors to.lose their jobs and tenure
AS dershwon had his first severe side beaten HIDDEN as NEVER should have been allowed to have or keep a law license as that severe wife beating would not allow ones by law to have or keep a license.
Yet, idk if he is the attorney for assange or if someone put it on wikipedia as a joke..
view the rest of the comments →
Alpo ago
It is not just CNN calling Assange a pedophile; it appears to be a covert CIA plot using a proprietary organization to smear Assange: http://archive.is/zXzAW
Assange's actions are consistent with those of a non-pedophile who is falsely accused. Wikileaks has the power to retaliate.
crystalclearme ago
Perhaps this is part of what Trump is going to discuss in his news conference about hacking and belief in Assange over all the agencies
vastrightwing ago
The accusation needs not be true. It's the meme that matters. It deflects attention away from the truth. Or away from what the Oligarchs want to obscure.
andrevandelft ago
The mentioned Reddit discussion is: https://archive.is/UC4td#selection-1917.71-1917.87
That refers to this Reddit thread: https://archive.is/ef15H
Highlights:
andrevandelft ago
Voater SavingGrace2 copied a tweet by Wikileaks, 7h ago. This gives much more understanding than my earlier post here: Intelligence graph for Clinton-linked plot to frame Assange as a Russian spy + paedophile. Discussion: https://www.reddit.com/search?q=todd+and+clare&sort=new https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1WJr5PXgAEZJD-.jpg
Tbear05 ago
Is there away to get this over to Assange?
crystalclearme ago
Bless you for this and making each of our tasks easier
Sharipie ago
SFO is also the address of Nancy Pelosi. doesn't prove anything, but is it a stretch to wonder if she is behind this? Not really.
EndThePizza ago
Toddandclare.com previously occupied the San Francisco address, which is now occupied by Premise Data.
Still suggests that there could be a connection, but it's not definitive.
JoJoVoat ago
yes but how coincidental huh? This is going to be a worldwide takedown..
kneo24 ago
I hope your post gets more upgoats. It breaks it down nice and easy.
The_Periodic_Fable ago
I think the CIA and CNN are having their "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!" moment in history
JoJoVoat ago
lol true that
wokethefkup ago
Can't we do one of those online petition things even if just to spread awareness on fb. It will get those clueless to pizzagate a bait and lure to at least slowly but surely figure out "what the actual fuck is going on". What should we do? I want to go about it the right away if anyone has an idea let me know. Peace love and let's expose those cunts. Tired of these wankers pulling the veil over citizens eyes. Though I feel fb is compromised due to its artificial intelligence engine they use. So as you can imagine keywords and such; are well, you get where I'm going with this. I smoked a joint I'm not as clear as usual but ya come on let's do this shit. * ties rambo bandana around my head. *
Cbradio ago
Public Trust Violation, class action. A town up north is doing that as exposed to leaks of a nuclear plant. That is an empowering fed case to win.
AreWeSure ago
Did CNN say it? Because if it was just Mudd, he has zero chance having a defamation suit go against CNN. It's bizarre.
terrordactyl ago
He's a paid CNN employee. Also might want to brush up on your legal knowledge.
AreWeSure ago
Educate me on the gaps in my knowledge.
Employers are not responsible for defamation. If I defame you, I'm responsible not my employer. Unless Assange is claiming that CNN directed him to say that as part of his job. I don't know this, but I would guess that analysts are contractors and not employees. I see a lot of clips of Phil Mudd on other networks, and some seem to overlap with his time on CNN.
VioletHeart ago
They have...371 new Hillary Clinton emails released as a result of litigation (link: https://foia.state.gov/Search/Results.aspx?collection=Litigation_F-2016-07895_5)) foia.state.gov/Search/Results…
ArthurEdens ago
Wow this is getting really pathetic, "nuh uh! YOU'RE the pedophile!"
Sentastixc ago
Indeed! This is what you do when you get accused of something like this! Silence is for the guilty!
justforthissubverse ago
Exactly true. My brother is familiar with interrogation. He once told me that for an innocent person, the usual reaction to being accused of a horrible crime, is anger. This came up because I was being accused of something I didn't do and I was incredibly angry and lashed out at my accuser, and their response to me was that "if I was innocent I wouldn't be so angry at them for accusing me" - which makes no sense of course. Normal people get angry when accused of bad shit they are innocent of doing.
the_one_tony_stark ago
That's one of the reasons I was almost certain alefantis was guilty of something shady. He didn't get angry when accused of being a pwdophile, but instead fought hard to sell a story of being a friendly guy.
Cbradio ago
Exactly, and goes on even here. Aside, is Alan Dershowitz, now an attorney for Assange? Its added on Dershowitz wikipedia?/Is that a joke that someone added?
And it is serious violations as this corp is lying to the UN, about a lot. Wikileaks did a great investigation on them and series of events. Same as Trump race accusation. The court filing, simply was judge requesting entity status of all parties; person, corp, nonprofit, how long, any past settlement history. No crime mentioned in the court filings, and no case goes through that quick, adding unec delays to legit cases that have waited a long time. Illegal..
Gaslight, isolate, outcaste, destroy. Same old tactics. Ones witness, ethics as choice is the option.
justforthissubverse ago
Seems true. This disturbs me. However, one does not hire an attorney based on the character of that attorney, but rather based on his connections and ability to get the job done. In which case Dershowitz is supremely qualified.
Still bothers me though...
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2011/02/alan-dershowitz-joins-julian-assange-defense-team-033359
Cbradio ago
Ethics wise, no and strategy wise, no. Dersh already was a conflict interest attorney forvepstein and others including royals AND got ALL of them Ofg on being later accused and charged and suchnon a court document being hidden from.the public and dersh WOULD be doing more of that elite LEGAL loophole of assange attorney..so no, dersh is not a lawyer to ever choose and dersh should legally not even be able to be a lawyer on this case..its severe conflict interest.
And as dersh is now trying to get the victims attorney to lose their hatdworked attorney license As dersh also caused many professors to.lose their jobs and tenure AS dershwon had his first severe side beaten HIDDEN as NEVER should have been allowed to have or keep a law license as that severe wife beating would not allow ones by law to have or keep a license.
Yet, idk if he is the attorney for assange or if someone put it on wikipedia as a joke..
justforthissubverse ago
I believe it was a Wikileaks tweet not wikipedia that released this info. http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2011/02/alan-dershowitz-joins-julian-assange-defense-team-033359
I can't disagree with any of your comments. Dersh should be in prison.
Cbradio ago
Oh, is there a Wiki tweets? I did not see. I found it on wikipedia as researching Dersh...but, don't know if its a joke put on wikipedia.
Sharipie ago
Assigned reaction is the exact opposite of John Pedostas.
DefenderOfTruth ago
Very good point