You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AreWeSure ago

You talk about crimes, but I see no evidence for the claims. The sale of Uranium One involved no crimes and multiple federal agencies confirmed it posed no threat to US security. You are using this for your claim of treason?

Joule is an American company. It is not controlled by Moscow or by Russian investors. And not a single word of that email concerns bribes.

You seem to alleging lobbying crimes, but it's not clear at all the specifics. The Panama Papers didn't reveal any crimes on behalf of the Podesta Group. Sberbank only became their client this year and they are publically registered as a lobbyist for Sberbank. See here

https://archive.is/ANo1b*

The issue they were hired to lobby on is US sanctions against the bank.

*Also there's a bonus there!

webofslime ago

Doug Band explicitly stated that Chelsea used 3 million in CF money to pay for her wedding.

The financials from the Clinton Foundation make it clear what is going on. Money laundering through a web of NGO's.

They are personally enriching themselves and their friends with blood money.

AreWeSure ago

I will sacrifice a chicken to the God of your choice if you can show me where Doug Band "explicitly" says this.

thewebofslime ago

https://www.gop.com/leaked-band-email-chelsea-used-clinton-foundation-resources-for-her-wedding/

In 2012, Amid A Spat With Chelsea Clinton, Doug Band Threatened That If Chelsea Wanted To Audit The Foundation That She Runs The Risk Of Exposing That She Used “Foundation Resources For Her Wedding And Life For A Decade…”

Here is a copy of the email...

https://i.sli.mg/tqQxLG.png

Vindicator ago

Aaand scene. The commitment to citing sources is why I love this sub. :-)

AreWeSure ago

It's a mis-cite of the source or he doesn't know explicitly means.

Verite1 ago

Bullshit. And to top it off Chelsea herself was suspect of the dealings of CF.

Vindicator ago

Yeah...I think that was window-dressing. I think she did that 'auditing' stuff and conflict with Doug Band or whatever his name is, so that she and her parents can later claim their underlings were doing the nefarious deals behind their backs and they tried to stop it.

Verite1 ago

This could be true. I'm just wondering though with everything we know from George Webb about Eric Braverman perhaps not knowing and being shielded from the actual activities and the chain of command and maybe that's why he has now disappeared or went underground, or whatever because he figured it out? Could Chelsea have also been kept in the dark in some way?

Vindicator ago

Absolutely. These people are experts at 'plausible deniability' and isolated sleeper-cell tactics. Chelsea has probably been preserved spotless in case she has to run for the presidency to pardon both her parents. Hope those 4chan anons that have gone underground have hacked 'em all and gathered a mountain of incriminating stuff.