You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

I'm fairly sure that "AreWeSure" is a shill or an idiot. He pulled the same thing about Tony Podesta's decapitated golden boy hanging from his ceiling. AreWeSure said it's just the "arch of hysteria" and nothing to do with Jeffrey Dahlmer posing a victim in the same position. To which I said a figure WITH a head is the "arch of hysteria". One withOUT a head is a tribute to Jeffrey Dahlmer.

AreWeSure ago

It's not a tribute to Jeffrey Dahmer and is not the same pose as the murdered victim. Note the arms. Note the Legs.

Guess what? Lots of statues are made without heads that have nothing to do with murder or decapitation. And I'm not referencing something generic when I said Arch of Hysteria. Louise Bourgeois titles her piece The Arch of Hysteria, in capital letters. It's literally the name of the artwork. It's a big freaking clue as to her intentions.

https://www.gallery.ca/en/see/collections/artwork.php?mkey=100798

In fact, she's made multiple artworks called the Arch of Hysteria. The "arch of hysteria" as a concept goes back to the 1800's and she was familiar with this concept decades before Dahmer. She was in psychoanalysis and identified as an hysteric herself. And was very familiar with Jean-Martin Charcot, the neurologist who first named this pose. She once while on a break from the art world produced some pyschoanalytic writing herself. http://www.slideshare.net/Taliewarlie/mc-escher-and-louise-bourgeois

One of the later arch of hysteria pieces is a female form with a head and bold colored stripes, but not arms. Also no relation to Jeffrey Dahmer. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/2a/2d/cb/2a2dcbcaccb84d84ede9528ae6d151c2.jpg

Looking at google searchs for Louise Bourgeoss and Jeffrey Dahmer comes up empty before this year.

Now try Louise Bourgeois and Charcot and you'll find a lot of art history pieces like this one. https://remedianetwork.net/2014/06/23/the-arch-of-hysteria/

DarkMath ago

Let me rephrase what I said then. To any other person Louise Bourgeois's work is simply an arch of hysteria. But to a sadistic Pedophile who enjoys Spirit Cooking and birthday cakes shaped like a baby's semi-erect penis Bourgeois's work takes on a distinctly Dahlmeresque connotation. Is that easier for you to understand? ;-)