You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

quantokitty ago

Well, Sfi was involved. Definitely. I'll try to find the link, but they were involved with children from five different countries. Russia was one of them.

PieInTheEye ago

If you could find the web links it would help me greatly. I seem to have discovered a very strong link to a person strongly involved in Fridays Child formation and management, who has links to a cancer and HIV/AIDS research program/s running between Seattle and Kenya, who operates out of Winchester, Virginia. The reason I find this interesting, is that Paul Gary Smith is currently living and operating a PCS Enterprises, L.L.C, out of Seattle.

This is all getting a little strange, but if you want to read strange, read my recent comments and research here regarding PRISM ( https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1506915 ).

( @quantokitty ) ... Let me know when you get URL's for evidence of the 5 countries that SFI Adoptions were running operations from ... I bet Kenya was one of them, and if Nicaragua is also one, then we have some dodgy doings indeed. I searched and searched, but could find no SFI program listings that clarified this.

quantokitty ago

Yes, I figured there must be something in that Seattle location, but really do not have the time to dig into that angle. No doubt the same is true for Kenya & Nicaragua. Here's the link:

https://laurabogardus.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/bogardus-thesis-study-final.pdf

It's perfect evidence because it's a report: Intercountry Adoption Programs and Waiting Child Photolistings. The woman writing is not connected to any of the agencies and is an objective party who questioned the advisability of photolisting children and also listing "EXTREMELY" personal information on the web. Like the child was a product of an incestuous relationship? I mean, why would you put that on a website with the child's pic? Anyway, good luck with this. Let me know when you post.

PieInTheEye ago

I had already seen this particular PDF, and referenced it. What I was looking for was specific information on which 5 countries SFI were operating in. I thought you stated in previous comments that you had seen country specific affiliations, and I thought perhaps you could reference specifics?

I have exhausted all channels of research available to me on SFI, and it is almost as if their overseas operations are/were either non-existent, or they were not very successful with their programs, but, as you say, this could be because privacy when it comes to legitimate adoption, or perverse trafficking posing as benevolent adoption services, is the norm. Too bad for the children concerned whose stories are lost to the concerned public or researchers.

SFI Adoption and SFI Family Institute were purged and terminated around the year 2014, so they must have gotten shut down for some legal reason, totally un-referenced on web accessible news articles or bloggers etc...

This thread is also buried now due to the dozens of marginal and sensationalist threads being posted, so the likelihood that anyone will add anything constructive here to further this line of inquiry, is very small. I wish people would focus on data accuracy and thoroughness, but I guess this is too much to ask from a forum frenzy of crowd sourced concernizens. Oh well ...

quantokitty ago

Oh, shut the hell up! You did not see that or you wouldn't have asked for help, you freakin' shill.

The only thing marginal is you. This here is a stupid shill folks. This idiot first bonded with me and asked to send me a link for proof that SFI services was indeed servicing five different countries in terms of adoptions. I sent them this one: https://laurabogardus.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/bogardus-thesis-study-final.pdf

The reason this idiot did that is to see if the evidence could be refuted and debunked and twisted into the left wing pedophile narrative, but it couldn't. So instead, this idiot tries a different tack and goes on and on with nonsense that they already had this and yada yada yada. This is the last time I'm responding to you. Enjoy the few pennies you earned for being an idiot.

PieInTheEye ago

I've seen the way you have been speaking to @bolus here when he posts uncomfortable facts for you, and you are clearly being a noxious concern troll. You are not interested in the facts, you are interested in getting likes for some narcissistic psychological reason ... obviously.

Not being willing to put aside ASSUMPTIONS when they turn out to be false leads, is tantamount to being a shill; actually maybe worse, because at least a shill (by definition) would be getting paid to propagate faulty information. People who are being paid to incentivize their love of falsehood are more easy for me to understand than someone doing it for some deep seeded psychological reason who then attacks others who are bothering to document the ACTUAL truth behind accusatory ASSUMPTIONS.

The BIZSTANDING record for PCS Enterprises LLC, is bunk, it has merged interstate records with totally different business identification numbers (as bolus already patiently tried to bring to your attention, when you also called him a shill), and seems to be the whole basis of your assumptions. These assumptions melt when correct business databases at State level are consulted (such as the SCC Virginia database).

Fridays Child and SFI Adoptions may in fact glean useful leads, but the whole Gusifer and Paul Smith lead, doesn't seem to be much of a lead at all. I'm sorry if that screws with your agenda. Find some other connection between these entities and people other than the BIZSTANDING junk record, and I will reappraise the value of such a 'lead'. In professional research, this BIZSTANDING record is what is simply known as BAD INFORMATION, and any researcher worth their salt has to be prepared to lay away bad information, otherwise they will sabotage their own investigation. It isn't hard to understand. The record can be proven to be scrambled using multiple different resources.

In 2005 when Gusifer LLC was formed, Guccifer (different spelling) the Romanian lone wolf hacker, wasn't a known entity, so why is this name Gusifer somehow magically different to any other real estate investment trust ("REIT") for federal income tax purposes ... like CONNEB II LLC? It has the Title records of 124 Amherst St attached to its assets, so it is obviously a real estate investment trust with probable shared ownership ... it is a medical/psychological practice for goodness sake, so it also would fit the profile for a shared business entity.

Grow up!