Does the fact that there is a statistic claiming that 8 million children worldwide go missing each year add to the investigation in any meaningful way?
Yes, it does. It shows how deep this shit goes.
There are far too many mods and silly rules that only hinder the investigation.
Does the fact that there is a statistic claiming that 8 million children worldwide go missing each year add to the investigation in any meaningful way?
Of course it does, but shills kept spamming that and connecting it to "blood harvesting." There's no evidence pizzagate has anything to do with that, and it's most likely disinformation designed to make us look crazy.
The above is a tried and true method of stopping up information " No one will believe you" "You will make us look crazy." "No first we have to do this, which will be acceptable, then we can bring the other stuff in [which never happens]"
It's the same tried and true stale lines used over and over to shut people up.
Fortunately for those of us connecting to those of like mind , over the Internets, it's not that easy to gaslight people anymore. That is the virtue and strength for us of our networked system.
There is lots of ways a researcher can corrupt the process by inserting an agenda. Some of them do it intentionally under direction of others.
It is difficult to detect which is which, and the rules are intended to make that process easier.
Which is why the discussion here about the rules is important, this is how we all navigate through the hordes who want this to stay undiscovered.
view the rest of the comments →
smokratez ago
Yes, it does. It shows how deep this shit goes.
There are far too many mods and silly rules that only hinder the investigation.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Of course it does, but shills kept spamming that and connecting it to "blood harvesting." There's no evidence pizzagate has anything to do with that, and it's most likely disinformation designed to make us look crazy.
samhara ago
Everyone should know this :
The above is a tried and true method of stopping up information " No one will believe you" "You will make us look crazy." "No first we have to do this, which will be acceptable, then we can bring the other stuff in [which never happens]"
It's the same tried and true stale lines used over and over to shut people up.
Fortunately for those of us connecting to those of like mind , over the Internets, it's not that easy to gaslight people anymore. That is the virtue and strength for us of our networked system.
Millennial_Falcon ago
You know what is also a tried and true method? Spreading disinformation to muddy the waters.
samhara ago
I have faith that the researchers can sort that themselves.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
Are you familiar with 'the Warren Commission'?
There is lots of ways a researcher can corrupt the process by inserting an agenda. Some of them do it intentionally under direction of others.
It is difficult to detect which is which, and the rules are intended to make that process easier.
Which is why the discussion here about the rules is important, this is how we all navigate through the hordes who want this to stay undiscovered.