Does the fact that there is a statistic claiming that 8 million children worldwide go missing each year add to the investigation in any meaningful way?
Yes, it does. It shows how deep this shit goes.
There are far too many mods and silly rules that only hinder the investigation.
Bilderberg & CFR openly advocate the use of childs blood for immortality of elite rich; Pizzagate is not about DNC/CF, its about Elite and their RIGHT to fuck, bleed, eat, kill, and farm children for immortality.
Epstein was banned from 'mar-a-lago' in 2007, only after 25+ years of a close fuck-buddy relationship of Trump-Epstein, google cocaine party's NCY, trump/epstein, 1,000's of eye-witnesses from 1980's->1999.
Regarding ban, a 14 yr old girl was giving massage to epstein, he tried to fuck her, she went to parents, who went to cops, cops went to mar-a-lago and they banned Epstein for life, not a fucking thing really to do with Epstein, he was an out of control pervert who thought he owned the world.
Trump started distancing himself from most of the MAFIA by 2004, when he knew he was being groomed for politics.
Epstein is a known MAFIA Mossad agent, also he is Bilderberg & CFR, just like Peter Thiel who is also connected to Trump & Epstein.
Does the fact that there is a statistic claiming that 8 million children worldwide go missing each year add to the investigation in any meaningful way?
Of course it does, but shills kept spamming that and connecting it to "blood harvesting." There's no evidence pizzagate has anything to do with that, and it's most likely disinformation designed to make us look crazy.
Yes, so if you act nuts, you're playing right into their hands. I'm not saying relevant information should be included from the sub. I'm saying "blood harvesting" is not relevant, at least for now, because there's zero evidence that pizzagate has anything to do with that. It's a real slippery slope if we allow stuff to be posted based on wildly speculative theories.
I have no idea, but you certainly don't seem to be jumping to provide your evidence. It's entirely possible you could believe what you're saying, yet have zero real evidence for it.
That's a smart way of approaching things. You didn't attack or judge me. Only expressed your concerns regarding the validity of my statements. That's what I would do.
From Miles W Mathis from his essay on Obama genealogy and in reference to the fear - porn. "Designed to make us look crazy."
They will call you "crazy" to make you shut - up . But that will not always work, considering they are the crazy ones.
"I was recently asked by a reader how I stay sane. I told him he was asking the wrong question. The
question is how all the people who don't know the truth stay sane. The answer is, they don't. It is
being caught in the Matrix that drives you insane. It is the blue pill that causes insanity, not the red pill.
The truth can be painful, and sometimes be temporarily disorienting. But it is the lies that cause
permanent disorientation, and eventual insanity. The truth, however painful, is clarifying. "
The above is a tried and true method of stopping up information " No one will believe you" "You will make us look crazy." "No first we have to do this, which will be acceptable, then we can bring the other stuff in [which never happens]"
It's the same tried and true stale lines used over and over to shut people up.
Fortunately for those of us connecting to those of like mind , over the Internets, it's not that easy to gaslight people anymore. That is the virtue and strength for us of our networked system.
There is lots of ways a researcher can corrupt the process by inserting an agenda. Some of them do it intentionally under direction of others.
It is difficult to detect which is which, and the rules are intended to make that process easier.
Which is why the discussion here about the rules is important, this is how we all navigate through the hordes who want this to stay undiscovered.
view the rest of the comments →
smokratez ago
Yes, it does. It shows how deep this shit goes.
There are far too many mods and silly rules that only hinder the investigation.
VictorSteinerDavos ago
Bilderberg & CFR openly advocate the use of childs blood for immortality of elite rich; Pizzagate is not about DNC/CF, its about Elite and their RIGHT to fuck, bleed, eat, kill, and farm children for immortality.
Epstein was banned from 'mar-a-lago' in 2007, only after 25+ years of a close fuck-buddy relationship of Trump-Epstein, google cocaine party's NCY, trump/epstein, 1,000's of eye-witnesses from 1980's->1999.
Regarding ban, a 14 yr old girl was giving massage to epstein, he tried to fuck her, she went to parents, who went to cops, cops went to mar-a-lago and they banned Epstein for life, not a fucking thing really to do with Epstein, he was an out of control pervert who thought he owned the world.
Trump started distancing himself from most of the MAFIA by 2004, when he knew he was being groomed for politics.
Epstein is a known MAFIA Mossad agent, also he is Bilderberg & CFR, just like Peter Thiel who is also connected to Trump & Epstein.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Of course it does, but shills kept spamming that and connecting it to "blood harvesting." There's no evidence pizzagate has anything to do with that, and it's most likely disinformation designed to make us look crazy.
WITLESS ago
Lone wolf pizza hungry lynch mob CRAZY. widen the inquiry.
Millennial_Falcon ago
relevant username?
smokratez ago
This is what I meant by crying about good pr. Every lead needs to be followed. The msm already tries to paint us as nuts.
Millennial_Falcon ago
Yes, so if you act nuts, you're playing right into their hands. I'm not saying relevant information should be included from the sub. I'm saying "blood harvesting" is not relevant, at least for now, because there's zero evidence that pizzagate has anything to do with that. It's a real slippery slope if we allow stuff to be posted based on wildly speculative theories.
smokratez ago
Nah, by caring about how they view us, you give them power. While they have been losing power for years already.
Ok. I am saying it is.
Millennial_Falcon ago
And you base this on what?
smokratez ago
Years of research. Why, do you think I am making it up? What would I have to gain from doing that?
Millennial_Falcon ago
I have no idea, but you certainly don't seem to be jumping to provide your evidence. It's entirely possible you could believe what you're saying, yet have zero real evidence for it.
smokratez ago
That's a smart way of approaching things. You didn't attack or judge me. Only expressed your concerns regarding the validity of my statements. That's what I would do.
samhara ago
From Miles W Mathis from his essay on Obama genealogy and in reference to the fear - porn. "Designed to make us look crazy."
They will call you "crazy" to make you shut - up . But that will not always work, considering they are the crazy ones.
"I was recently asked by a reader how I stay sane. I told him he was asking the wrong question. The question is how all the people who don't know the truth stay sane. The answer is, they don't. It is being caught in the Matrix that drives you insane. It is the blue pill that causes insanity, not the red pill. The truth can be painful, and sometimes be temporarily disorienting. But it is the lies that cause permanent disorientation, and eventual insanity. The truth, however painful, is clarifying. "
samhara ago
Everyone should know this :
The above is a tried and true method of stopping up information " No one will believe you" "You will make us look crazy." "No first we have to do this, which will be acceptable, then we can bring the other stuff in [which never happens]"
It's the same tried and true stale lines used over and over to shut people up.
Fortunately for those of us connecting to those of like mind , over the Internets, it's not that easy to gaslight people anymore. That is the virtue and strength for us of our networked system.
Millennial_Falcon ago
You know what is also a tried and true method? Spreading disinformation to muddy the waters.
samhara ago
I have faith that the researchers can sort that themselves.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
Are you familiar with 'the Warren Commission'?
There is lots of ways a researcher can corrupt the process by inserting an agenda. Some of them do it intentionally under direction of others.
It is difficult to detect which is which, and the rules are intended to make that process easier.
Which is why the discussion here about the rules is important, this is how we all navigate through the hordes who want this to stay undiscovered.