Relevance to Pedocracy should be the test. Pedocracy is the name suggested for the suspected, likely informal association of elite individuals that use pedophilia to organize, manage and discipline their efforts to dominate or disproportionately influence outcomes in matters of interest. We do not investigate pedophilia in general or individual acts or actors in isolation. We do investigate any activity and persons that are in close proximity to the levers of power in and over society as a whole. That includes government as well as politics -- executive, legislative, judicial, lobbying, military, intelligence -- as well as media, business, finance, law, medicine, accounting, technology, academia, think tanks, philanthropy, endowments, etc. Geographically, we may focus now on DC/US but we are open to information concerning overseas extensions and possible interlinkage with foreign analogs.
Fine, but , for instance, Gacy, - http://crime.about.com/od/serial/p/gacy.htm - may seem to be an individual case, but it turns out he's connected to the Bush brothers, he and his partner are.
So I really don't see the value in excluding anything. Because you can't know ahead of time what is important. Why limit the investigation. It's not as though we have a shortage of paper, with the Internets facility. Also, we don't have a limit to the number of amateurs who could become invovled. As I see here there is some thousands already. And on Facebook there's close to 10 K on this subject. Why limit it? I'm suspicious of the motivations for that.
If I was excluded from some posts I want to make, for a reason I didn't see fit, I would just start a new Sub -Verse for my topic. Does anyone see any problem with that? And if that's the case why the stress over what may be deleted from this particular subverse here? Can't one sub-verse link to another? What if I just created another sub-verse called "Pizza Street" - which I prefer the name anyway?
view the rest of the comments →
readstuff ago
Relevance to Pedocracy should be the test. Pedocracy is the name suggested for the suspected, likely informal association of elite individuals that use pedophilia to organize, manage and discipline their efforts to dominate or disproportionately influence outcomes in matters of interest. We do not investigate pedophilia in general or individual acts or actors in isolation. We do investigate any activity and persons that are in close proximity to the levers of power in and over society as a whole. That includes government as well as politics -- executive, legislative, judicial, lobbying, military, intelligence -- as well as media, business, finance, law, medicine, accounting, technology, academia, think tanks, philanthropy, endowments, etc. Geographically, we may focus now on DC/US but we are open to information concerning overseas extensions and possible interlinkage with foreign analogs.
samhara ago
Fine, but , for instance, Gacy, - http://crime.about.com/od/serial/p/gacy.htm - may seem to be an individual case, but it turns out he's connected to the Bush brothers, he and his partner are.
So I really don't see the value in excluding anything. Because you can't know ahead of time what is important. Why limit the investigation. It's not as though we have a shortage of paper, with the Internets facility. Also, we don't have a limit to the number of amateurs who could become invovled. As I see here there is some thousands already. And on Facebook there's close to 10 K on this subject. Why limit it? I'm suspicious of the motivations for that.
If I was excluded from some posts I want to make, for a reason I didn't see fit, I would just start a new Sub -Verse for my topic. Does anyone see any problem with that? And if that's the case why the stress over what may be deleted from this particular subverse here? Can't one sub-verse link to another? What if I just created another sub-verse called "Pizza Street" - which I prefer the name anyway?