You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

hedy ago

George Webb is talking a lot about the arms trafficking. I haven't seen all his vids (he has been doing one every day since former CF CEO Eric Braverman's disappearance - on day 55) so I don't know that he comes right out to say that there is no PG, but he talks primarily about the weapons trades. It is VERY good analysis but perhaps just one perspective in a larger network of crime. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1499862

RecycledUser ago

I will check out George Webb on this. Also, if you check out Mr. Cati's videos, I believe the one from Nov 5 or 7, he has Julian Assange as the main subject. He explains these global underground networks: arms, slavery, money laundering. They are all in place, so a human trafficking one would be feasible, it would just use the contacts and chains already there. He goes into numerology a lot, so even if you don't believe in that, the explanation is worth watching. https://youtu.be/F-Q7smiC9tQ. Edit:. found link, Nov 5, The Assange - Qatar Deception.

RecycledUser ago

Since this video and others discuss Steve P's Nov 1 video as a psyop, I would be curious to hear OP and others' take on that.

LaDonnaRae ago

I will try, but I tend to go cross-eyed on the subject of numerology. Maybe if I had some basis for understanding it, but when someone says "Well, p has a numeric value of six" (or whatever) I am lost. I have no idea where they get this stuff. And, thanks! I have tried Mr. Cati before, but I really do have to skip the numerology portions. I will try your suggestions, though.

RecycledUser ago

You'll see in my previous comment the link to it.

LaDonnaRae ago

Got it. Thank you.

RecycledUser ago

That's what I do too, I get lost in the numbers stuff. Plus it would be very hard to use in convincing someone. :)

LaDonnaRae ago

I agree. And I will get to your videos in the next day. I am tracking something right now and do not want to lose my train-of-thought. But I look forward to seeing what you have. Thank you again.

LaDonnaRae ago

Yes, he has excellent research on the military side of things, and I sent him a message about PizzaGate. But I think we can best use him where he is.

hedy ago

BTW - I see that you are the author. Good post. Although we do not know that "FBIanon" is male, female, one person, a coordinated group, FBI, other.

farmmama10 ago

Actually, I just reread FBIanon last night and he referred to his wife. I guess I'm assuming it's a male?

IceDagger316 ago

Women can legally marry women now, don't forget. Having a wife is zero indication of gender on an anonymous person.

ZalesMcMuffin ago

It's inconclusive, but still adds weight in one direction based on abstract probability.

IceDagger316 ago

You're right...the probability is that FBIAnon is a guy, but I thought it was shared somewhere that they were a woman? Maybe that was an assumption...

Either way, whether it's a Mulder or a Scully, I hope they haven't been found out.

hedy ago

He could be - you just never know (remember the "plausible deniability" phrase. Also, there's reason to suspect there was more than one person posing as "FBIanon".

LaDonnaRae ago

GREAT POINT!

LaDonnaRae ago

Yeah, someone already pointed that out to me on Gab. I guess I am a female misogynist. LMAO!

hedy ago

no worries!