collaboration on the other side: TIMELINE OF PIZZAGATE NEWS NARRATIVE (pizzagate)

submitted ago by tjarco

as a response to TIMELINE OF PIZZAGATE RELATED CENSORSHIP let's combine forces and archive what views are pushed in the media in stead of being pulled.

making lists like these is a combination of checking up on new threads (which i guess everyone does?) and following a format to keep it easy to read & store.

i'm willing to experiment to make this thread an collaborative effort therefore I ask to explore if contributing to this thread by commenting following a format can be achieved.

I'm not close to being a expert on collaborative research so I'm open for suggestions.

Consider contributing to this list in the following format:

  • date article published
  • publisher (newspaper/blog/company)
  • title
  • link to article

  • archived link

  • tiny text (this one is tough to define :s my 2 cents would be to say is the least amount of words to index the main topics, maybe # things to keep wording common)

SCOPE OF CONTRIBUTIONS documenting the media's reaction to PG evolving. I can foresee a flooding of links if we also start focussing on local and foreign news outlets and too much if we add social media. Monitoring every publication is extensive but yields a worthy insight in Media. I suspect that a lot of information is copied from other sources. The media's dependency on each other could be exposed. Trying to comprehend who 'fabricates' the news is the most important. Finding the earliest statements of news regarding PG dating back to the wikileaks, and try to group the web of derivatives that copied the content for the original source.

I'm no anon but I hope some is watching so we can work to strip these pages into a datasheet or even create a form if voat eventually gets shut down.

let's go!

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Infopractical ago

You mentioned I should bring this here:

I noted that when I first heard about pizzagate in late November, Wikipedia didn't have an entry for it. More recently an entry was created that forcefully called pizzagate a "conspiracy theory" instead of an investigation. Due to the "debunked" stories, the links there fit the Wikipedia rules for major news sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pizzagate_(conspiracy_theory)&offset=&limit=500&action=history

That feels like a clever way to censor: game the Wikipedia rule system for "major sources".

Infopractical ago

I want to add that several of the most notorious D.C. pedophiles do not have Wikipedia entries, and that strikes me as very odd. These include Ryan Loskarn and also Daniel Rosen, the latter of whom was Director of Counterterrorism in the State Department. Early in my own documenting of pizzagate, I had another name or two to add to this list, but I was just getting started in my research at the time and focused on big picture details.