You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1754llp0l171c4l ago

Interesting! Look at the book "Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov":

https://www.instagram.com/p/VuaYoGB-UI/

Now check the review at Amazon by Folantin of the book:

"The story is narrated by middle-aged Humbert Humbert. He's a pedophile--although he's tried denying it, tried disguising it, and tried channeling his baser instincts, but as luck would have it, Humbert finds himself as the lodger at the home of a buxom, lonely widow, Charlotte Haze and 12-year-old daughter, Lolita. Humbert doesn't particularly even like Lolita--he actually finds her rather dull, but she becomes a vessel for the fantasies left by Humbert's unfulfilled first love affair."

Does he have any kids?

https://www.instagram.com/p/70XnUFB-b3/

https://www.instagram.com/p/78RHxoh-fr/

https://www.instagram.com/p/8bZxdwB-dW/

https://www.instagram.com/p/8oaW2ch-WA/

https://www.instagram.com/p/_YB6Pdh-Ve/

https://www.instagram.com/p/4fJ0Dsh-Qp/

https://www.instagram.com/p/mleH0-h-Xa/

https://www.instagram.com/p/Rh1_nsB-f_/

https://www.instagram.com/p/Rh2IVLh-QE/

Devious1 ago

U need to learn how to archive things, all links are dead and buried Archive.is

1754llp0l171c4l ago

Someone already did: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1525501

Devious1 ago

Thanks, have seen this since I posted a reply to you.

shootermcgvn ago

Any archives on these? Instagram is private now.

28leinad82 ago

want some more fun trivia? Frank Giustra, Clinton donor, owns Lions Gate film, and the first movie they put out after he took over was Lolita.

justiceforever ago

Good research. How can we see who liked what?

popezandy ago

Lolita is a popular book idiot. I know a lot of people who have read it, though it is regarded as unsettling

VieBleu ago

Go ahead, talk some more about it.

ThighHighSwampBoots ago

Lol

1754llp0l171c4l ago

Ohh, yeah, definitely not relevant when investigating a pedophilia ring... Sleep CTR.

VettedChicken ago

Although he phrased it poorly, Lolita is a very popular and well-known book. I would not consider it evidence per se. Hell, I've read the book. It's pretty good, and Nabokov really does interesting things with making you rationalize along with the Narrator.

popezandy ago

My point was definitely more of how have you never heard of Lolita, not that it wasn't relevant. It isn't conclusive evidence but certainly I wouldn't associate myself with that damned book.

ThighHighSwampBoots ago

And everyone brags about their fucking first edition books, when it's a classic.

CJJacobs ago

And we're off! ....Down the CTR forum slide pole.

ThighHighSwampBoots ago

What's CTR?

VettedChicken ago

I'm honestly starting to be driven away from the investigation by the ultra-paranoid people who believe any dissent must be coming from some faceless propagandist body. I'm sure there are propagandists on this platform, but the absurdity really becomes apparent when you try to comment something to either clarify a misunderstanding or express a perspective and you get called a shill.

CJJacobs ago

You've been here 12 days.

Control the Record (CTR) is David Brock's paid-shill site sent to social media places like this to spread disinformation/misinformation.

But you knew that?

VettedChicken ago

Have you no culture at all? Even most people I know with very little knowledge of the arts are aware of the prominence of the book. I'm not saying it's definitely not evidence, but have a little perspective my man.

CJJacobs ago

Shill Alert.

VettedChicken ago

Listen man I totally believe that there is some insidious, sick activity going on. I've been behind the investigation since the beginning, and have posted on voat (though I deleted my earlier post which was actually pointing out shill twitter accounts lmao). So the irony of you calling me a shill is palpable. I know that any response that you don't like is going to be met with "shill alert," but I have hope that somewhere inside you will actually consider what I'm about to say. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shill. I totally agree with the aim of this investigation, I agree that the Podestas are probably linked with clandestine human trafficking, and this probably extends to the Clinton Foundation as well. If this investigation is to arrive at the truth, we need to not simply plug our ears and call everyone who says something we don't like a shill. It simply isn't productive.

CJJacobs ago

Thank you for clarifying.

Any response I don't like will not necessarily be met with 'shill alert'....the problem is that this site has been overrun with shills. Literally our entire hot page is virtually nothing but old news rehashed, news from 'Russia', and posts like this one with random photos and person who have a VERY LIMITED connection to the thrust of what is being investigated.

I have been trying to warn people.

We need to get a new site. This place is full of forum-slides, emotional bagging, concern trolls and others. Virtually nothing of merit is making it to the top anymore. #Jesus

ThighHighSwampBoots ago

Why?

1754llp0l171c4l ago

Why to what?

We are at the pizzagate subverse. You don't find it interesting that one of James Alefantis instagram "buddies" takes a picture of a book narrated from a pedophiles perspective?

ThighHighSwampBoots ago

No, why to "Does he have any kids?"

ThighHighSwampBoots ago

And thanks for the down votes, Jethro.