RexAxisMundi ago

He did provide the sources. You were just impatient. Pull your head out your ass.

AllDancingCrap ago

This is a big dump, I mean people do post weird shit but this. Look been from this generation Ive been exposed to a lot of porn A LOT of porn, and the female in that picture looks too young, at least a very petite woman to say the least. But honestly I think its a minor and this is CP out in the open.

CrackerJacks ago

Wouldn't it be a good idea to archive them links? I ask because I'm not tech savvy or I would do it myself.

setter ago

This thread seems to have disappeared from hot. OP has deleted his account. Should we repost?

CrackerJacks ago

Yes repost it.

Gorillion ago

Was just wondering the same thing. Why would OP or the Mods delete this?

CrackerJacks ago

The OP deleted his account, maybe got scared for highlighting the pictures he found....Should be reposted tbh.

Heffter ago

Chad_Stethoscope ago

A WHOIS search shows the babygrapevine.com Web site is registered with 'Whois Privacy Corp.' in Nassau, Bahamas, through 'Internet Domain Service BS Corp.' Not much luck there.

Both Baby Grapevine and the now defunct Wellwishers Limited are/were owned/operated by 'Paul Robin Kent' and 'Donna Gail Kent'. Wellwishers Limited (dissolved in 2007) was based at Bridge Road Business Park, Haywards Heath, West Sussex.

The other publicly listed member of Wellwishers was 'Nigel Paul Smith'.

Looking through the lens of #PizzaGate, the Baby Grapevine blog post on 'tips for taking better photos of babies' feels wrong, but it's likely innocent enough.

Still, leave no hole undug. Thanks for posting.

smokratez ago

It's not strange. Gays end up being that way through sexual abuse. Why is it a stretch that they perpetuate the abuse? They got robbed of their innocence by some satanic gay. That's all they know then and it becomes their life. What's more innocent than a baby? People here still think it's weird that I hate gays.

YingYangMom ago

Isis are no better. Why would they give a fart?

Hopevoats ago

This is fascinating! It's one of those things that struck me as odd, but I didn't think to dig deeper. If I were able, I'd scour through and archive the social media pages of all of these people and their connections to each other and other prominent players. I'd also build a spreadsheet detailing the patterns of who sent and received each email and the context of other emails with the parents. Here's my take on this:

I think that Podesta and Soros have a vested interest in the children. These people are eugenicists and involved in supremacy and continuation of bloodlines. Inbreeding causes a concentration of genetic traits and defects; some of which would be troublesome (and thus eliminated) while others may serve to advance their cause.

We are getting to a point where the long-mocked concept of alien/human hybridization is no longer so far out there.

Special children could serve a variety of purposes (which have been addressed in multiple threads) and they have the technology (CRISPR) to custom design a human to select for desirable traits.

I believe this is what they are doing. And I'be said it in various threads with this and my reddit account. Playing God with the CRISPR.

28leinad82 ago

No, but during an election obviously there's a lot of baby kissing going on - Podesta doesn't really have a great reason to receive so many baby related emails.

IsThisThingSafe ago

If keeping 20-30 emails of people's newborns since 2008 makes you a pedophile, then I am three to four times the pedophile Podesta is. Let's stick to the big picture with the Clinton Foundation money. Getting bogged down in GPS coordinates of 7 year old photographs is a waste of energy. Please don't try to convince anyone that this Pedo ring is real because Podesta saved newborn announcements from a few dozen people.

md3inaustin ago

A little strange for a man with no kids of his own, indeed. But also not enough on it's own to warrant checking into everyone's lives, yet.

28leinad82 ago

agreed - just an idea to shelf for later reference I think. I'm more interested in the bizarre powerpoint files from his chinese buddy. who makes a powerpoint file of 20 pictures of pandas or builds or birds and sends it to someone... wtf.

cantsleepawink ago

I haven't been through all your links but something strikes me from what I've seen. Are most of those emails from people with a gmail address? I would have expected to see a variety of email address providers, including business email addresses.

spez_dispenser ago

Great observation.

warrior_of_light ago

What amount of time are we talking about here, to recieve a unusual amount of photos? If the guy had a baby during that time frame, it might not be THAT bad. Wiki says he has 3 kids. I think the guys guilty as shit btw.

28leinad82 ago

pretty sure his kids are all much older. He's 66 years old or so.

jonnythaiwongy9 ago

No this is fucked. They will say, he just loves babies this shows hes a decent man. Not a fucking chance. People even women who love babies dont do this shit. Excellent find!

RexAxisMundi ago

People need to learn to be patient. Not like anyone is getting paid to do this research.

momojaja ago

This is very abnormal I have to say. The main focus seems to be on the babies. It's as if the supposed parents are advertising Podesta to choose.

ALDO_NOVA ago

they all seem to describe how healthy the baby is, and include weight and length....very odd

yes, like they are hoping JP will choose their baby

Chad_Stethoscope ago

Recently I've had several friends/relatives with new babies and they all send out the obligatory 'It's a healthy boy/girl' messages/pics with varying degrees of other vital statistics like weight and length. This in itself is not unusual at all.

If the Internet has taught us anything, it's that people LOVE to share their damned baby photos, almost as much as their cat photos...

ALDO_NOVA ago

true, if a newborn, I can understand bragging about the stats.

r3dtr1x ago

The emails go back to 2008. Considering the number of people this guy is connected to, I don't immediately find the quantity of baby emails suspicious...

but then again, I just checked his Linkedin. LOL

Look at the stuff he cares about, look at what's #1:

Volunteer Experience & Causes

Causes John cares about:

Children Civil Rights and Social Action Disaster and Humanitarian Relief Economic Empowerment Education Environment Health Human Rights Politics Poverty Alleviation Science and Technology Social Services

https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnpodesta

28leinad82 ago

I dont think the quantity is that odd either for the number of emails, but the proportion of baby photos vs any other photos is very strange. It's like over half his personal photos are of babies. Im more inclined to think he just likes to keep these emails and he deletes other personal emails.

r3dtr1x ago

Isn't there like 55,000 Podesta emails?

RedGreenAlliance ago

Look folks. I am a businessman and a father of two kids under 3. I use my work email like Podesta for all sorts including private, business, investments you name it. I have double the number of emails. NOT ONCE has anyone sent me photos of babies or kids, nor have i done the same. I don't think we can dismiss this. I just think its odd. If people want to share 'social' photos, they normally do it on facebook etc

setter ago

If this is his email, imagine what his Whatsapp conversations contain.

I barely send personal emails to anyone, it's used for business and to receive shopping confirmations etc.

ALDO_NOVA ago

they all seem to describe how healthy the baby is, and include weight and length....very odd

mishka ago

He probably specifically asks for baby pictures. Can't initially sound too harmful, a guy saying he really likes to see kids.

28leinad82 ago

a few of those emails do suggest he was waiting for pics. "as promised here are some photos" etc. So that may be correct.

YingYangMom ago

Nice find.

28leinad82 ago

I wouldnt expect Podesta has Facebook so I can understand this might be the only way people can show him their new baby, and maybe politicians get a lot more baby photos for some reason. But 20+ is still strange. I personally have only been emailed one baby photo in like.. 2 years. But I use Facebook.

WhatevsFloatsUrGoat ago

Yeah, this is perhaps more normal and expected when you and your friends are in the late 20s, or 30s, all getting married and knocked up around the same time... But jeez, Podesta is an old geezer - something's not right here.

28leinad82 ago

done, cheers.

Gorillion ago

Looks like this submission has been deleted. Re-upload if you can.

28leinad82 ago

This may just be a case of a normal amount of baby and kid photos, but he happens to KEEP these emails, and deletes other personal emails? It seems that there's only 3 types of attachments he gets - work related, family stuff, and babies. A lot of babies.

j2436 ago

He listed some in his comment here

crazyworld ago

Also worth noticing most of them are BCC. Very strange

28leinad82 ago

yes a lot of "undisclosed recipients" perhaps to make it look like its a group announcement when its only going to one guy.

Piscina ago

Could these be people prostituting their babies, or offering them up to Podesta in return for a favour? I remember Joe Biden's words to a father of a child he seemed taken by (in a very creepy way). He held her shoulders in a possessive way, and said to her father, "If there's anything you need you let me know", as if to say "I can make things happen for you if you offer up your daughter to me".

28leinad82 ago

i fucking hope not... but this week has taught me nothing is impossible :(

SIMONBARROW ago

This is definitely important. Out of the first 11 you posted, most are merely COPIED to Podesta. But that's odd in itself. If there's no direct connection between Podesta and the baby shown in the photo, then people are sending him the relevant emails knowing he will find them 'interesting.'

I've looked at all of them now and there are definitely far more photos of babies being sent, directly or indirectly, to John Podesta, than I could have imagined. This is something new that no one has noticed before. Thanks for the hard work!

28leinad82 ago

I hope theres nothing to it, dont really like being the creeper that links to 18 baby photos of likely innocent people.. but i just couldnt help but notice how many damn babies I was finding.

RexAxisMundi ago

That's an awful lot of baby pics from non family members. Very suspect for a childless man to have that many.

ladylucy ago

do any of the photos have embed GPS coordinates?

RedGreenAlliance ago

reference them with direct wikileak links if true then this would be very good circumstanial evidence but without backing up your claim i agree this should be deleted. i am not going to waste my time verifying your claim

28leinad82 ago

I did, in another comment.

RedGreenAlliance ago

Hey fella good job and fantastic catch. This is definitely odd,.

CrackerJacks ago

John Podesta seems to have a lot of friends, but "to me" he doesn't seem like the kind of person you'd send baby pictures to.

28leinad82 ago

that is true but the general public (presumably most of these people) wouldn't have known that at the time.. hopefully.

SIMONBARROW ago

If what you're saying is true, it's extremely disturbing. I've only seen Rosalie ("Rosie").

28leinad82 ago

no sources? I said, the emails are the sources. I'll list some of them soon, takes a while to find them again.