I have been through just about all emails with attachments.
I noticed something quite odd.. the sheer quantity of baby photos that are sent to John Podesta, from dozens of different people. I can understand now and then if you have friends who have a baby, you can expect a photo (if you aren't on social media).
But i'm talking dozens.. maybe 25 or 30 different babies. It seems excessive, almost unlikely, that someone would receive that many photos of new babies to their email.
Do we want to do some background checks on these people to actually see if they are real people? I don't like the idea of prying but it really did stand out how many baby photos he has.
It's probably legit but I'm starting to think maybe it's worth a quick look.
Thoughts?
view the rest of the comments →
Chad_Stethoscope ago
A WHOIS search shows the babygrapevine.com Web site is registered with 'Whois Privacy Corp.' in Nassau, Bahamas, through 'Internet Domain Service BS Corp.' Not much luck there.
Both Baby Grapevine and the now defunct Wellwishers Limited are/were owned/operated by 'Paul Robin Kent' and 'Donna Gail Kent'. Wellwishers Limited (dissolved in 2007) was based at Bridge Road Business Park, Haywards Heath, West Sussex.
The other publicly listed member of Wellwishers was 'Nigel Paul Smith'.
Looking through the lens of #PizzaGate, the Baby Grapevine blog post on 'tips for taking better photos of babies' feels wrong, but it's likely innocent enough.
Still, leave no hole undug. Thanks for posting.