I have been through just about all emails with attachments.
I noticed something quite odd.. the sheer quantity of baby photos that are sent to John Podesta, from dozens of different people. I can understand now and then if you have friends who have a baby, you can expect a photo (if you aren't on social media).
But i'm talking dozens.. maybe 25 or 30 different babies. It seems excessive, almost unlikely, that someone would receive that many photos of new babies to their email.
Do we want to do some background checks on these people to actually see if they are real people? I don't like the idea of prying but it really did stand out how many baby photos he has.
It's probably legit but I'm starting to think maybe it's worth a quick look.
Thoughts?
view the rest of the comments →
IsThisThingSafe ago
If keeping 20-30 emails of people's newborns since 2008 makes you a pedophile, then I am three to four times the pedophile Podesta is. Let's stick to the big picture with the Clinton Foundation money. Getting bogged down in GPS coordinates of 7 year old photographs is a waste of energy. Please don't try to convince anyone that this Pedo ring is real because Podesta saved newborn announcements from a few dozen people.