You need to understand that there's innocent until guilty proven. Many people stick to it, that's one of the principles of our civilization.
There's no doubt that the New York Times and Washington Post articles were cover ups. Full of panic, false claims, and they came up early, which suggest they were ordered.
Now move to Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia. He's most likely sitting on a fence with this case. He probably believes us, but needs proof, otherwise big fat lawsuit is waiting. You go out and call him names? Give him the proof first.
Look at this, you write
Here is a good article I found: 10 Facts About Wikipedia Founder That Will Shock The Hell Out Of You http://archive.is/H6cN8
Really? This article says the following:
"""Did you know that Jimmy Wales was a porn king who sold online pornography before launching Wikipedia"""
And that's an argument for you? GTFO! I have a high school female friend who owns a porn-producing company. OMG, how shocking. Smoking gun! Surely some people turned away from said friend, but I don't give a fuck. That's not a crime. That's not even morally dubious by today's standards.
And by the way, why aren't you researching the real, but boring stuff, like the Podesta sketches? I've written another email analyzing what we know about them, and I have the feeling we have 80-90% of the sub-case done. Yet nobody's investigating this further. Instead, people post sensationalist shit like this. No cool, man.
PS I Haven't read the rest the rest of your post.
Bottom line: This is what people call "crazy bullshit". That's the shit that gets us labeled "false news".
view the rest of the comments →
antipedo ago
You need to understand that there's innocent until guilty proven. Many people stick to it, that's one of the principles of our civilization.
There's no doubt that the New York Times and Washington Post articles were cover ups. Full of panic, false claims, and they came up early, which suggest they were ordered.
Now move to Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia. He's most likely sitting on a fence with this case. He probably believes us, but needs proof, otherwise big fat lawsuit is waiting. You go out and call him names? Give him the proof first.
Look at this, you write
Really? This article says the following:
"""Did you know that Jimmy Wales was a porn king who sold online pornography before launching Wikipedia"""
And that's an argument for you? GTFO! I have a high school female friend who owns a porn-producing company. OMG, how shocking. Smoking gun! Surely some people turned away from said friend, but I don't give a fuck. That's not a crime. That's not even morally dubious by today's standards.
And by the way, why aren't you researching the real, but boring stuff, like the Podesta sketches? I've written another email analyzing what we know about them, and I have the feeling we have 80-90% of the sub-case done. Yet nobody's investigating this further. Instead, people post sensationalist shit like this. No cool, man.
PS I Haven't read the rest the rest of your post.
Bottom line: This is what people call "crazy bullshit". That's the shit that gets us labeled "false news".