I like Infogalactic and have been moving towards using it. I like their seven canons vs Wikipedia's 5 pillars. I only post this because I know normies don't use infogalactic yet.
It is so obvious the deflecting they are trying to do. Like someone getting their house searched, and standing in front of the places they don't want searched. People who do harmful things like this, are essentially not very conscious people. If they were, they would not be harmful, or at such pains to appear important. Aware people would not do these harmful things, or sanction them. Aware people, like there are many of here , will do all they can, to make sure these children are safe. The reason I mention this, is that unaware people are bound to make many mistakes. They are sleepwalking through life. Also the truth always has a way of coming out. I believe it is s coming out especially about this, because it is such an urgent and crucial matter. To everyone except the person who chooses the Wikipedia stories I guess! That site pretends to be based on public submissions, and is pushing the bounds of incredulity to not have any submissions about this on there.
Someone please create a wikipidia page about this investigation, with as much depth as possible. If no one is going to do this by tomorrow morning, I guess I'll get started.
You could start with the Infogalactic page as an outline. Hell, I get the sense that someone has already tried using the contents of Infogalactic on Wikipedia and it was just removed.
Great idea. this case is so clear, that it could be done, without having to even say much directly, but simply to point out the objective facts. I am glad people have been saying the direct things they have, but this is a case, where really the facts speak very loudly, and the best thing to do, is let them speak. Plus, the more factual you make it, the more likely you will succeed at getting an article on there. I think I will try also...
No a thinking person can resolve that this witch-hunt is bullshit in about ten minutes.
The problem is that most believers spent months over at reddit/the-donald and are religious about their convictions, and you can't get a blind man to see, a non-believer can look at the scant evidence and see there never was a crime and dismiss the entire witch-hunt
an ALT-Tard cannot see the LIES because they have been brain-washed, its like SCIENTOLOGY slipped everyone a blue-pill over at 4chan,reddit, and sent them to voat
An unbiased investigation is certainly warranted, if not only to provide conclusive vindication to those accused. Anyone who is anti-investigation (gathering, analyzing and linking evidence) and attempts to jump to conclusions one way or the other is suspect. Your personal opinion holds no value to anyone other than yourself.
Not on my watch! But yea someone that knows a editor on Wikipedia please let them know. New users can't make edits to that post
I did some more looking on the page and apparently we need a registered user with more than 30 days tenure and more than 500 edits to change it. I wonder who made the edit and who he works for.
I also found that this wiki has been changed at least 4 times all from this month.
Wow I didn't realize wikipedia had information we didn't regarding pizza gate and was able to make this determination with solid proof that completely disproves every single claim made.
Looking at the wikipedia talk page regarding Pizzagate it seems that their basis for dismissing it out of hand as conspiracy is because the almighty infallible Snopes says so: http://www.snopes.com/pizzagate-conspiracy/
What did you expect? Afterall wikipedia is one of the main infobase to lookup new stuff for many people and it was only a matter of time until they would start influencing the contents...
psymin ago
Use Infogalactic instead :)
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/12/a-tale-of-two-pizzagates.html
iDerp69 ago
I like Infogalactic and have been moving towards using it. I like their seven canons vs Wikipedia's 5 pillars. I only post this because I know normies don't use infogalactic yet.
YouaremeandIamyou ago
It is so obvious the deflecting they are trying to do. Like someone getting their house searched, and standing in front of the places they don't want searched. People who do harmful things like this, are essentially not very conscious people. If they were, they would not be harmful, or at such pains to appear important. Aware people would not do these harmful things, or sanction them. Aware people, like there are many of here , will do all they can, to make sure these children are safe. The reason I mention this, is that unaware people are bound to make many mistakes. They are sleepwalking through life. Also the truth always has a way of coming out. I believe it is s coming out especially about this, because it is such an urgent and crucial matter. To everyone except the person who chooses the Wikipedia stories I guess! That site pretends to be based on public submissions, and is pushing the bounds of incredulity to not have any submissions about this on there.
iDerp69 ago
This is so on-point. I'll upvoat this when I get some more.
I am pessimistic about Trump's "drain the swamp" rhetoric, but there's a chance that his administration can help bring this stuff to light.
YouaremeandIamyou ago
and there is this equally telling entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Ping_Pong
CJJacobs ago
Well, go edit it! :) And use Infogalactic instead.
researchgirl101010 ago
Nice find. The rabbit hole is much deeper. Please look at my research.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1454872
Phobos_Mothership ago
I guess none of us donated enough, did you guys know that just 3$ from every user during a single day could fund wikipedia for the next year?
Or, you know, a much larger sum of money from the Podestas and the Clinton Foundation...
KaliPhobos ago
Yess that might be a good idea only to get some more attention to this case. But make sure to always keep a backup in case wikipedia pulls the plug.
bryoneill11 ago
Who is the wikipedia editor who wrote this?
researchgirl101010 ago
Please see my research:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1454872
exclusivemuffin ago
Someone please create a wikipidia page about this investigation, with as much depth as possible. If no one is going to do this by tomorrow morning, I guess I'll get started.
iDerp69 ago
You could start with the Infogalactic page as an outline. Hell, I get the sense that someone has already tried using the contents of Infogalactic on Wikipedia and it was just removed.
YouaremeandIamyou ago
Great idea. this case is so clear, that it could be done, without having to even say much directly, but simply to point out the objective facts. I am glad people have been saying the direct things they have, but this is a case, where really the facts speak very loudly, and the best thing to do, is let them speak. Plus, the more factual you make it, the more likely you will succeed at getting an article on there. I think I will try also...
trite ago
I now understand why teachers didn't let me cite Wikipedia in highschool.
BL4CKR4BBiT ago
Weird how they determined that the allegations were false WITHOUT ANY SORT OF INVESTIGATION WHATSOEVER
KingKongVoats ago
No a thinking person can resolve that this witch-hunt is bullshit in about ten minutes.
The problem is that most believers spent months over at reddit/the-donald and are religious about their convictions, and you can't get a blind man to see, a non-believer can look at the scant evidence and see there never was a crime and dismiss the entire witch-hunt
an ALT-Tard cannot see the LIES because they have been brain-washed, its like SCIENTOLOGY slipped everyone a blue-pill over at 4chan,reddit, and sent them to voat
Ample4th ago
Nice try http://www.lermanet.com/scientologynews/penthouse-LRonHubbardJr-interview-1983.htm
BL4CKR4BBiT ago
^ member for 20 minutes...
An unbiased investigation is certainly warranted, if not only to provide conclusive vindication to those accused. Anyone who is anti-investigation (gathering, analyzing and linking evidence) and attempts to jump to conclusions one way or the other is suspect. Your personal opinion holds no value to anyone other than yourself.
KingKongVoats ago
Listen Autist, I know over on 4chan you can talk shit, over here on voat, nobody buys this bile that your investigating, your witch-hunting.
Where is the evidence? NADA Yet where are the bodies? Where is the crime? NADA
Go back to 4chan and study child-porn.
BL4CKR4BBiT ago
I am not, nor have I ever been on 4-Chan. Try again.
notArobott ago
this foul creature must be a bot or a troll
BL4CKR4BBiT ago
You gotta pay the troll toll, to get in this boys soul.
notArobott ago
Did you just say "boy's hole"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OR4zefzP7d0
Htaed ago
Donate 10 dollars to Wikipedia and you will have the option to edit.
LtSilverFox ago
Not on my watch! But yea someone that knows a editor on Wikipedia please let them know. New users can't make edits to that post I did some more looking on the page and apparently we need a registered user with more than 30 days tenure and more than 500 edits to change it. I wonder who made the edit and who he works for. I also found that this wiki has been changed at least 4 times all from this month.
PizzaGatinOnYa ago
Wow I didn't realize wikipedia had information we didn't regarding pizza gate and was able to make this determination with solid proof that completely disproves every single claim made.
I agree..
Citation needed
SecularPenguinist ago
Fuck Wikipedia, they've proven to be yet another minion of the establishment.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Pizzagate
Looking at the wikipedia talk page regarding Pizzagate it seems that their basis for dismissing it out of hand as conspiracy is because the almighty infallible Snopes says so: http://www.snopes.com/pizzagate-conspiracy/
KaliPhobos ago
What did you expect? Afterall wikipedia is one of the main infobase to lookup new stuff for many people and it was only a matter of time until they would start influencing the contents...
MeatballPizza ago
Can you post a link to the archive of the Instagram?
MeatballPizza ago
Link to the top stories here....Drive some traffic over!