I remember talking some 25 years ago to a journalist, who gave BBC as the example of independent journalism. He said that BBC refused to call British soldiers "our boys" when reporting the attack on Islas Malvinas aka the Falklands.
This was years after "Sir James Wilson Vincent Savile" had established himself well there, good 15 years after Johnny Rotten openly said in an interview that Saville was a pedo.
I've written to the author of the article, I haven't been offensive or insulting. I've only asked him to answer a couple of questions so just waiting on an answer i'll let your know of the results. I suggest you all do the same but I can't reiterate the fact don't harass them, that's not how to progress.
EDIT: I got a reply "Hi ------(my name which I have left blank for obvious reasons), sorry you didn’t agree with the facts as laid out in the article. Anybody can ask questions but you need to provide real proof not just some twisted interpretation of a few Instagram photos.
You’re right about the BBC’s troubled history. It’s terrible. That’s before my time here though.
Thanks for reading."
To be honest I think he's right, we need definitive proof before the mainstream can take us on, because I can see it from their perspective, if they go on speculation they run the chance of losing credibility (not that they had any to begin with) but we need to start looking for Facts, we already know they are tied to satanic practice and about the creepy art and now even money laundering, we are almost at a giant breakthrough just keep faith!
One of the following reasons:
* They are into it -> not very likely
* They are being blackmailed -> very likely. I'd also say this was the case with Jimmy Saville, and now The Ring, a supposed ring of pedos, hold BBC hostage. Same with WP and NYT.
* They dismiss the proof, because it's chaotic.
Yes guys, we didn't do a good job with the follow up on the emails. Example: the sketches that look like the Podesta brothers were made by private investigators. We are very close to blowing something up here, but we have to finally at least prove that the Scotland Yard held them in secret. Yet nobody is dealing with the issue.
There are more minor neglected issues. People concentrate on sensationalism too much.
Did we finally find a link between those sketches and a public institution? Those sketches were made by private eyes, and if we don't have any links to officials, then BBC and the like can dismiss it.
C'mon guys, it's time to do some boring work too, not only the exciting one. Go find proof those sketches were hidden by the Scotland Yard.
To mention Wikileaks and the Podesta emails, without mentioning what is wrong with these emails, I call a monster Chutzpah.
Incredible, how they are destroying their remaining (minimal) credibility.
I guess it must be very important for them, if they destroy themselfes for it.
I keep waiting for one of these debunking stories to show the clip of Majestic Ape and say, "Well, this is maybe why people might be questioning things." But haven't seen it yet.
I've been seeing this a lot. The Snopes article listed it as "false" basically without refuting anything too. It's almost like they're expecting people will only read the headline.
a lot of people are just reading the headline then instantly dismissing lol trust me iv asked a few of my people to look into it and they refrenced snopes,
i had no idea what snopes was but it didnt matter because they did not address a single fact
That's a point. In fact, most people do no more than glance at headlines and convey the substance of the headline to their friends. That's why actual articles are increasingly poorly written and lacking in content. Often, they don't even spellcheck the text before posting it online.
"Sometimes an innocent picture of a child in a basket is just an innocent picture of a child in a basket and not proof of a child sex trafficking ring," he says.
This example is highly selective and the article should (if it wasn't an effort to discredit investigation) have looked at the 'child in a basket' quote in the greater context of Alefantis' Instagram posts AND the sick commentary that accompanies most of these photos.
-girl toddler with her hands taped to a ping pong table (Hotard - comment)
sometimes a picture of a 'hotard' with her arms taped to a ping pong table is just a 'hotard with her arms taped to a ping pong table
The article is official propaganda. It's a whitewash. Another attempt by the establishment media to bury the investigation as 'pranksters' and 'paranoid fringes'. Again, portraying Alefantis as an innocent victim and completely cherry picked items in order to discredit.
"Sometimes an innocent picture of a child in a basket is just an innocent picture of a child in a basket and not proof of a child sex trafficking ring," he says.
And he is right.
But two pictures of children raise eyebrows, and twenty pics with pedo hashtags will even convince liberals like yours truly. I'd never vote for the Orange Chimp. All I want is bloody revenge on Podestas and their ring. I want blood.
Note that he used the word "sometimes"? It implies that sometimes it can go the other way too. These articles only legitimize Pizzagate, and we are definitely in the right direction.
Sometimes a picture of a child in a basket is a picture of an abused child who seems to be hugging an orange as if it's the most precious thing she's ever been given in her life. Clearly, she doesn't get clam pizza and house salad.
Ahh, I just posted it. Sorry I didn't realize it was already posted. The BBC is responsible for hiding the sick pedophilic acts of Jimmy Savile. They knew he was pedo and did nothing about it. So it makes sense they are covering for more pedos.
Mark Thompson, former head of the BBC, now works at the New York Times (they also did an article claiming pizzagate was fabricated without actually debunking anything) Here's a link to the article about Mark Thompson lying about Jimmy Savile.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10512203/Former-BBC-boss-Mark-Thompson-lied-over-Savile-evidence-Nick-Pollard-claims.html
That's great news. Tens of thousands of more people will look to see what it's all about and that'll lead to a few thousand more folks investigating. Nice!
antipedo ago
Killroom won't convince novices to the case. A shirt glimpse and you go "tgats a room, so what".
antipedo ago
No, because she's dead.
antipedo ago
Sad. Really sad.
I remember talking some 25 years ago to a journalist, who gave BBC as the example of independent journalism. He said that BBC refused to call British soldiers "our boys" when reporting the attack on Islas Malvinas aka the Falklands.
This was years after "Sir James Wilson Vincent Savile" had established himself well there, good 15 years after Johnny Rotten openly said in an interview that Saville was a pedo.
Urebeat ago
I've written to the author of the article, I haven't been offensive or insulting. I've only asked him to answer a couple of questions so just waiting on an answer i'll let your know of the results. I suggest you all do the same but I can't reiterate the fact don't harass them, that's not how to progress.
EDIT: I got a reply "Hi ------(my name which I have left blank for obvious reasons), sorry you didn’t agree with the facts as laid out in the article. Anybody can ask questions but you need to provide real proof not just some twisted interpretation of a few Instagram photos.
You’re right about the BBC’s troubled history. It’s terrible. That’s before my time here though.
Thanks for reading."
To be honest I think he's right, we need definitive proof before the mainstream can take us on, because I can see it from their perspective, if they go on speculation they run the chance of losing credibility (not that they had any to begin with) but we need to start looking for Facts, we already know they are tied to satanic practice and about the creepy art and now even money laundering, we are almost at a giant breakthrough just keep faith!
antipedo ago
I'm leaving this #pizzagate. Too many kids just looking for sensation and not doing the real investigative (read: boring) work.
This case will cause some stir, but will go down.
Which is horrible, because we have alerted the pedos, and now they will be way more careful, so no way we could catch anybody from now on.
dookiehowzer ago
lol of course bbc is claiming fake news.. we all kno how much those british fucks love little boys and girls
catslovejustice ago
Wow there really is a globalist effort to try to shut this thing down. And why would anyone believe the BBC especially on this subject matter!
senpaithatignoresyou ago
Why is the BBC trying so hard to cover this up?
antipedo ago
One of the following reasons: * They are into it -> not very likely * They are being blackmailed -> very likely. I'd also say this was the case with Jimmy Saville, and now The Ring, a supposed ring of pedos, hold BBC hostage. Same with WP and NYT. * They dismiss the proof, because it's chaotic.
Yes guys, we didn't do a good job with the follow up on the emails. Example: the sketches that look like the Podesta brothers were made by private investigators. We are very close to blowing something up here, but we have to finally at least prove that the Scotland Yard held them in secret. Yet nobody is dealing with the issue.
There are more minor neglected issues. People concentrate on sensationalism too much.
topkek1337 ago
What are they supposed to do? Put out an article with all the evidence of which there is ZERO?
TheGettysburgAddress ago
BBC has been protecting pedophiles for decades, see Saville case as example A. There is a reason the NWO controls the MSM and this is why.
CrackerJacks ago
Nothing about Maddie McCann and the e-fits of Podesta and his brother.
BBC shouldn't be anywhere near child abuse investigations even civilian ones.
antipedo ago
Did we finally find a link between those sketches and a public institution? Those sketches were made by private eyes, and if we don't have any links to officials, then BBC and the like can dismiss it.
C'mon guys, it's time to do some boring work too, not only the exciting one. Go find proof those sketches were hidden by the Scotland Yard.
SIMONBARROW ago
This is one way we know they're guilty: all they have to offer is refutations that don't refute.
micha_ ago
That BBC?
TheGettysburgAddress ago
Just a coincidence, like the entire mountain of circumstantial evidence on Pedogate.
/sarcasm
micha_ ago
To mention Wikileaks and the Podesta emails, without mentioning what is wrong with these emails, I call a monster Chutzpah. Incredible, how they are destroying their remaining (minimal) credibility. I guess it must be very important for them, if they destroy themselfes for it.
SlackeryTurnBull ago
I keep waiting for one of these debunking stories to show the clip of Majestic Ape and say, "Well, this is maybe why people might be questioning things." But haven't seen it yet.
MetalAegis ago
Thats right BBC, keep digging yourself into a hole.
Ryonne ago
I've been seeing this a lot. The Snopes article listed it as "false" basically without refuting anything too. It's almost like they're expecting people will only read the headline.
dookiehowzer ago
a lot of people are just reading the headline then instantly dismissing lol trust me iv asked a few of my people to look into it and they refrenced snopes,
i had no idea what snopes was but it didnt matter because they did not address a single fact
SIMONBARROW ago
That's a point. In fact, most people do no more than glance at headlines and convey the substance of the headline to their friends. That's why actual articles are increasingly poorly written and lacking in content. Often, they don't even spellcheck the text before posting it online.
Koched_Up404 ago
BBC is quoting Alefantis as saying:
This example is highly selective and the article should (if it wasn't an effort to discredit investigation) have looked at the 'child in a basket' quote in the greater context of Alefantis' Instagram posts AND the sick commentary that accompanies most of these photos.
-girl toddler with her hands taped to a ping pong table (Hotard - comment)
sometimes a picture of a 'hotard' with her arms taped to a ping pong table is just a 'hotard with her arms taped to a ping pong table
The article is official propaganda. It's a whitewash. Another attempt by the establishment media to bury the investigation as 'pranksters' and 'paranoid fringes'. Again, portraying Alefantis as an innocent victim and completely cherry picked items in order to discredit.
antipedo ago
And he is right.
But two pictures of children raise eyebrows, and twenty pics with pedo hashtags will even convince liberals like yours truly. I'd never vote for the Orange Chimp. All I want is bloody revenge on Podestas and their ring. I want blood.
madhatter67 ago
Yeh....and sometimes a picture of a girl in a basket has dead panda eyes and lank greasy hair and inappropriate comments
We stopped believing you a long time ago BBC
llm2016 ago
Note that he used the word "sometimes"? It implies that sometimes it can go the other way too. These articles only legitimize Pizzagate, and we are definitely in the right direction.
SIMONBARROW ago
Sometimes a picture of a child in a basket is a picture of an abused child who seems to be hugging an orange as if it's the most precious thing she's ever been given in her life. Clearly, she doesn't get clam pizza and house salad.
podestadamolesta ago
Ahh, I just posted it. Sorry I didn't realize it was already posted. The BBC is responsible for hiding the sick pedophilic acts of Jimmy Savile. They knew he was pedo and did nothing about it. So it makes sense they are covering for more pedos. Mark Thompson, former head of the BBC, now works at the New York Times (they also did an article claiming pizzagate was fabricated without actually debunking anything) Here's a link to the article about Mark Thompson lying about Jimmy Savile. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10512203/Former-BBC-boss-Mark-Thompson-lied-over-Savile-evidence-Nick-Pollard-claims.html
OpenSoulOpenMind ago
was just reading this.. absolutely disgusting, but NOT surprised in the least knowing the BBC's reputation for protecting pedophiles
Remember that Ricky Dearman interview? They tried their hardest to make it appear that he was innocent, but the proof in the puddin sometimes...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0Q0mhvoBRM
MeatballPizza ago
That's great news. Tens of thousands of more people will look to see what it's all about and that'll lead to a few thousand more folks investigating. Nice!