This is another one of those pieces of evidence when, taken by itself, isn't that big of a deal. But when taken into a grander context it becomes rather meaningful. It's like a sentence in a growing essay that has as it's position that James Alefantis may be a pedophile. Any single piece of evidence can be explained away, but when those more and more pieces keep being added to the pile, all that confirm the position, it becomes harder and harder to explain away.
It becomes statistically less and less likely that the common theme across all these connections (paedophilia) is completely coincidental. Someone should do the stats on it so we can have some maths to back it up, like 'the chances of all these different things being unrelated to one another in a meaningful context, and only related to one another purely by chance, is 1 in seven thousand trillion" or something.
view the rest of the comments →
Wage_Slave217 ago
This is another one of those pieces of evidence when, taken by itself, isn't that big of a deal. But when taken into a grander context it becomes rather meaningful. It's like a sentence in a growing essay that has as it's position that James Alefantis may be a pedophile. Any single piece of evidence can be explained away, but when those more and more pieces keep being added to the pile, all that confirm the position, it becomes harder and harder to explain away.
SpikyAube ago
It becomes statistically less and less likely that the common theme across all these connections (paedophilia) is completely coincidental. Someone should do the stats on it so we can have some maths to back it up, like 'the chances of all these different things being unrelated to one another in a meaningful context, and only related to one another purely by chance, is 1 in seven thousand trillion" or something.
VictorDaniels777 ago
I think this is a great idea. I would love to throw that in someone's face right now.