from what's been assembled already, there's not an honest DA who would ever have a problem being suspicious on the level of urgency when thinking about tortured and abused kids. the same media pushback has been alive and well in the UK for decades, along with parliament. but the stuff you guys are assembling is massive. there's stages to every investigation, and as investigations go, this is probably the most crucial our species has ever faced, imo. and there seems to be no problem with folks regulating themselves around here. everyone seems to understand what's at stake.

I think this is a great idea. I would love to throw that in someone's face right now.

That's easier said than done. When you deal with such a complex series of events, there are a thousand ways to come up with the numbers and therefore it begins to appear subjective rather than objective, and defeats the purpose of the whole thing. For example, you could say that there are X-million statues in the world, the chances that Jimmy chose that statue by mere chance are 1 in X-million. But then somebody might argue that Jimmy has a long lost brother who lives in the same city as that museum. All of a sudden the numbers are not so bulletproof. It's better to just let the facts speak for themselves and let people come to their own conclusions. Trying too hard to be indisputable could backfire.