Devil's advocate, but couldn't this potentially interfere with the people's due process? I mean isn't he essentially doxxing people he believes are pedophiles before they have their day in court? I understand that he would have contacted them online and they may have turned up to meet what they thought were underage people, but that's not my point. I know voat is staunchly anti-pedo, but I'm not defending pedophiles, I'm defending due process. If we let it erode for those we despise, then it simultaneously erodes for those we like as well, even though we may not witness it right away.
This meme is Jewish propaganda. Why that narrative exists is obvious if you understand what Jews are and what they strive to do. It's the idea that only the Jewish-infested court system can deliver "justice". That even the outsider, the pervert, the Jew, the violent animal have rights.
Well they don't.
And they shouldn't. And the illusion that they should must be dispensed with.
Lynching and vigilantism are both perfectly good ways to combat corrupt institutions and violent criminals. They are perfectly good ways to deliver justice, real and swift. And they worked fine for a very long time, transferring power away from centralized structures and directly into the hands of fathers and communities and volk.
The more harsh the punishment is not correlated with reduced offending. There is pretty clear evidence of this. In fact the more harsh the punishment, the more a person is likely to do more harm. E.g. If they know they are going to be put on death row or shot anyway, then why not go all out and do as much as you can before you die? It is arguably more important to defend due process for people that we despise. SJWs like to use similar logic, in that they don't want people they perceive to be "right-wing" to have any rights. That ring-wing people shouldn't be able to have freedom of speech/thought. But the problem is when the tide turns they will be on the receiving end, so we all need to fight to have rights, whether it be due process, freedom of speech/expression etc. Otherwise what's the point?
That talmudism doesn't work, because deterrents clearly work and work well.
Let the violent go ahead and die and try to do as much damage as they can, if they can. That's what we used to do in Europe. It's called enforcing the law. Eventually the criminal element is effectively bred out of the population.
Otherwise what's the point?
The point is not equality, or rights, but civilization - the passing down of our memes and genes to our sons.
view the rest of the comments →
fortuitouslyunfallen ago
Devil's advocate, but couldn't this potentially interfere with the people's due process? I mean isn't he essentially doxxing people he believes are pedophiles before they have their day in court? I understand that he would have contacted them online and they may have turned up to meet what they thought were underage people, but that's not my point. I know voat is staunchly anti-pedo, but I'm not defending pedophiles, I'm defending due process. If we let it erode for those we despise, then it simultaneously erodes for those we like as well, even though we may not witness it right away.
lissencarak ago
Look at that blue-pilled faggotry.
This meme is Jewish propaganda. Why that narrative exists is obvious if you understand what Jews are and what they strive to do. It's the idea that only the Jewish-infested court system can deliver "justice". That even the outsider, the pervert, the Jew, the violent animal have rights.
Well they don't.
And they shouldn't. And the illusion that they should must be dispensed with.
Lynching and vigilantism are both perfectly good ways to combat corrupt institutions and violent criminals. They are perfectly good ways to deliver justice, real and swift. And they worked fine for a very long time, transferring power away from centralized structures and directly into the hands of fathers and communities and volk.
fortuitouslyunfallen ago
The more harsh the punishment is not correlated with reduced offending. There is pretty clear evidence of this. In fact the more harsh the punishment, the more a person is likely to do more harm. E.g. If they know they are going to be put on death row or shot anyway, then why not go all out and do as much as you can before you die? It is arguably more important to defend due process for people that we despise. SJWs like to use similar logic, in that they don't want people they perceive to be "right-wing" to have any rights. That ring-wing people shouldn't be able to have freedom of speech/thought. But the problem is when the tide turns they will be on the receiving end, so we all need to fight to have rights, whether it be due process, freedom of speech/expression etc. Otherwise what's the point?
lissencarak ago
That talmudism doesn't work, because deterrents clearly work and work well.
Let the violent go ahead and die and try to do as much damage as they can, if they can. That's what we used to do in Europe. It's called enforcing the law. Eventually the criminal element is effectively bred out of the population.
The point is not equality, or rights, but civilization - the passing down of our memes and genes to our sons.