You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

thantik ago

This is a great jewish way to try and get your opinion forced on others. Put up a poll. Word the poll in such a way that it's only legitimate outcome is to agree with you. Point at poll as the users agreeing with you.

Fuck off @sguevar.

sguevar ago

(G.G) You are entitled to your opinion, as stupid as it might be.

thantik ago

Look at your poll again, you dumb kike.

It's literally:

Should we implement a new rule? Yes/No

How many chances should they get when they break this new rule? (now pushing the assumption that a new rule gets made).

sguevar ago

The criticism is valid. Thanks for shining a light there despite the stupid approach you took.

On the questions what wording would you have chosen?

I don't the criticism at all and is more than welcome so we can get a unbiased poll to get past this stupid drama that is annoying all of us.

So how about if you give me your proposal for the wording on the poll, following the order of the questions and the different options they should have?

Waiting.

And you can leave the kike adjective behind because as you despise them so do I. You didn't like it, allow me to understand better your position and then we can come to an agreement.

thantik ago

At the very least, you should have added options for "No Rule" to the other questions in which you assumed that they voted for a new rule. This will get rid of the bias for answers of "1", which are the default.

Furthermore, I don't have the time to think about a proper set of poll questions at the moment. You have to carefully navigate in order to maintain neutrality in the questions and I just don't have the time to form a legitimate set of questions as I'm only posting on my lunch break from work.

sguevar ago

Understood I will work on it and make another test poll - I also went through it fairly fast as I am also at work.

Plus I would like to add the proposals another user provided as additional options to handle the issue.