The fact that @puttitout banned aged based purely on a brigaded request thread by people who themselves are spammers (and unlike aged their 'spam' wasn't even relevant to the subverse).
Like it's very hard to feel sympathy for someone like /u/aged, but this uneven enforcement is ridiculous, why is /u/theoldones not banned when he spammed /v/gaming constantly with self posts reqursting /u/aged to be banned? Are these relevant to gaming but lewd fanart of adult female game characters is not?
If puttitout can give an explanation of which rule was broken I'd be ok with it, but as it stands "im a dictator lmao" is not an excuse to ban a user.
view the rest of the comments →
PuttItOut ago
Yup, I banned him and I stand by it.
Laurentius_the_pyro ago
Which rule did he violate?
PuttItOut ago
Spam.
Laurentius_the_pyro ago
How was anything he posted 'spam'? it was A. relevant to the subverse, and B. didn't violate any rules, and C. wasn't for commercial gain.
Are unpopular posts now considered spam?
PuttItOut ago
This is ridiculous, and you know this.
Aged has been a complaint since the beginning of time. His contributions are not received well and off topic. v/Gaming is a system sub and I get the call on it.
17485281? ago
His posts were gaming characters. No different then someone submitting videos of someone doing their own arrangements of video game music. They were on topic.
And now we are getting calls to ban all gaming art, all "porn". https://voat.co/v/gaming/3104737
The rules they are clamouring for, means I can not submit this image to highlight DMC5 censorship.
The problem is you made the call, calling it spam. You now are saying aged was disruptive, was a complaint, and want the sub have a new rule "Because we do need to work to define a new rule about people who disrupt things on purpose."
frenemy ago
anything from the game skullgirls would be an insta ban.