This subverse now has a new rule: No untagged NSFW content
This includes depictions of nudity, violence, and gore. Any untagged posts will be tagged by the moderators and flaired as appropriate, and for both posts and comments a formal warning will be issued to the user. Three warnings in a seven day period will result in a permanent ban from the subverse. Any bans related to this rule will contain a link to the comment detailing the violations in the ban reason, visible in the log of banned users. Enforcement of this rule will begin tomorrow, 2018-12-08.
Example warning:
This [post|comment] violates the rule "No untagged NSFW content". In the future, please [tag your post via the "toggle nsfw" option|designate your comment as NSFW by having a description of the content or "NSFW" somewhere in the comment]. Note that three violations of this rule within a period of seven days will result in a permanent ban.
Your previous violations of this rule:
If you see any untagged NSFW posts or comments, please report and select the new rule or ping the mods.
Thank you to everyone who weighed in on the previous discussion about implementing rules. I believe this is the best course of action to maintain the subverse's integrity while still upholding voat's core principles of freedom and transparency. Please feel free to discuss, and let me know if you have any concerns or possible changes you'd like to see.
view the rest of the comments →
15455865? ago
Oranges and lemons.
Not saying /theology should be a system sub, but I only created it because it didn't exist and I wanted to post one thing, so I tried to treat it like a system sub and with voat's 'no censorship/ only down voting and commenting' ideals.
something_went_wrong ago
A bit of unsolicited advice: the term "theology" in the sub name is guaranteed to attract a "diverse" set of users. I think you damned yourself if you think you can control sub content beyond "no censorship/ only down voting and commenting."