First off, I need to say that I know I’ve let a lot of you down (if not all). I know I’ve not met your expectations of an admin or a leader. I have no excuses as even I feel this way about myself. I won’t make attempts for empathy, I will only acknowledge the truth, and it is such.
Life is full of surprises. You can be rich one minute and living out of your car the next. You can be healthy one year and a regular in the doctor’s office the following. You can have life figured out only to discover you know nothing in the end. The only constant in life is change.
My life is not the same it was when I first met @Atko and started working on Voat. I have much less time, I have a bit less fight in me (getting old does this), I have a bit more struggle in life. These life changes have forced me to put Voat on the back burner (which hurts me).
Let’s get real
When it comes to “Free Speech” sites, I once believed that people cared enough about the value of free speech to make “clone” sites like Voat (or gab) successful. I’ve come to realize, and have said before, that this single factor isn’t enough. People simply do not value this right enough to make a “clone” successful.
You can see this with Voat. A majority of Voat users still use Reddit. People use Reddit for posting and interacting when it comes to PC topics (4 wheel drive subs, movie subs, book subs, etc.). They use Voat to post the things they can’t post on Reddit. This creates an imbalance where Voat becomes increasingly un-PC, while Reddit gets the neutral content (I know even the most hardened ideologue has a level of civility). The end result is this imbalance drives people away as people wear out when confronted by content like this over the long run.
I don’t know the solution to this, and I am not attempting to pass blame, I am simply stating a truth that has to considered.
What makes a clone not a clone?
Why I mention this in the first place is that I know a “clone” site will not become sustainable based on Freedom of Speech so I’ve tried to revolutionize the “community” aspect of Voat by providing a way the community itself can “vote” on policy (rules, mods, anything actually). It's the future capability of this feature-set that is appealing. A community can become self-sustaining and self-manageable through this new technology. After all, the draw of sites like Voat or Reddit is that it is community-oriented vs. self-oriented.
And I’m going to finish it. I’m going to finish it for me. I’m going to finish it for you. I’m going to finish it for Voat. I’m going to finish it for Freedom of Speech (because I still believe in this ideal).
I’m going to finish it because a “clone” site with no differentiation but policy will never succeed.
So Voat, please forgive me for my shortcomings if you can, and expect my work to continue on making Voat a truly unique website.
Soon.
P.S. Downtime today was because of a full disk (Thanks @derram for letting me know). We had an issue from about a year ago that inflated some files to crazy sizes and I took the time today to deal with this. So the next downtime should be something completely different! Yay!
https://voat.co/v/announcements/1330806
view the rest of the comments →
albatrosv15 ago
1) Do you remember the monthly donation drive? It is gone. You know why? Cause we just can't donate anymore. Why?
2) You have to get a second living being besides you, who would maintain voat. And you could blame everything on him or her, when everything goes south!
PuttItOut ago
CrustyBeaver52 ago
You can use old tech to do an end run around any commercial industry wide ban sanctions. For example, you can set up a post office box number and have people mail you money orders - cashable by you, in banks and other money vendors around the world. There are many legal ways to send money that do not rely upon dependence of third party credit providers.
There is always a way. Many business may pay their bills with checks drawn on bank accounts, but still accept cash only.
You can also have a lawyer write a cease and desist letter to the credit card companies. Their ban of your website is highly illegal, and you can sue them for massive financial damages if they refuse to lift it. Voat is an American company, and it has legal rights to operate in an American manner under American law. Freedom of speech is very much protected.
Understand that under American law, companies that provide merchant services do not have the legal power to blacklist any lawful corporation. It's called illegal restraint of trade, among other things, and it is illegal for them to do so. They are liable to you for commercial damages for interfering in your legal contractual relationships with the rest of us.
They know this is true, but they are doing this until they receive a demand letter from your lawyer, then they will stop, or they will pay. They know you are not an American lawyer.
Voopin__Voopin ago
I really like the sound of that. Hope putt reads it. @puttitout
CrustyBeaver52 ago
Yes, there are solutions.
Also, I believe under American law, the users of this website would qualify as class participants in any lawsuit against the credit companies - for it is not just Putt's transactions that are being interfered with, it is also ours. They are illegally interfering in OUR trade.
Something to consider.