...and it tarnishes burnishes Voat’s public image.
Voat is still acquiring its own public image. v/niggers does more than tarnish Voat. It's a defining characteristic of Voat's 'No Censorship and Freedom of Speech Model' and, by extension, Voat Inc.
There's this strange desire among some members on voat to become "respected" and they think to do that we need a good public image. The only way voat ever would have a "good public image" is to be completely cucked. To start with, if you want to be respectable in the eyes of the establishment (e.g. liberals) a good place to start is by ignoring what niggers do to our society.
Niggers destroy our cities, they violently attack whites, they vote for destructive liberals who raise our taxes to pay for niggers to breed without working. With affirmative action they push more qualified students out of college, force more qualified workers out of jobs, force more qualified contractors out of government contracts. Niggers are the reason your wife needs to feel anxiety when walking home in a major city. Niggers are the reason you need to pay 200% more for a house to put your kids into a non-nigger infested school.
Now if voat is willing to ignore all of that, they're on the road to being respectable in the eyes of the globalists who are rubbing their hands at the goyim's naivety.
There's a big difference between between supporting free speech and supporting hate speech. subs like /v/niggers and /v/fatpeoplehate should be allowed, but they should not in any way be supported by the site. This means the only time you see them is if you're in the sub. They should never be featured anywhere else.
Let me put it another way - there's a big difference between allowing hate speech and supporting it. The way they try to discuss racial problems doesn't help anything, and it makes voat look like shit. Sooner or later the money is going to run out, and this place will cease to exist. It's something to think about. The problems with racism against whites by blacks won't be solved with racism from whites against blacks. It's time to grow up, or vanish. Your choice.
Both those subs are hate speech, there's no other way to describe them. I think voat HAS to allow hate speech in order to continue being a free speech haven. It just doesn't need to pay any real attention to it.
I'd prefer to be feared more than seen as a "respectable", I don't mean feared in the menacing, truly scary meaning, I mean feared because you can't lie to me. We've all had that teacher, parent, or boss that's heard it all before that only a moron would try lying, that's what I mean.
I think the standard Voat sets is that you should be completely free to say what you just said, so long as your community isn't doing anything illegal.
I think there is a market growing for Voat and tolerance for freedom of expression.
view the rest of the comments →
7553321? ago
Voat is still acquiring its own public image. v/niggers does more than tarnish Voat. It's a defining characteristic of Voat's 'No Censorship and Freedom of Speech Model' and, by extension, Voat Inc.
7553678? ago
There's this strange desire among some members on voat to become "respected" and they think to do that we need a good public image. The only way voat ever would have a "good public image" is to be completely cucked. To start with, if you want to be respectable in the eyes of the establishment (e.g. liberals) a good place to start is by ignoring what niggers do to our society.
Niggers destroy our cities, they violently attack whites, they vote for destructive liberals who raise our taxes to pay for niggers to breed without working. With affirmative action they push more qualified students out of college, force more qualified workers out of jobs, force more qualified contractors out of government contracts. Niggers are the reason your wife needs to feel anxiety when walking home in a major city. Niggers are the reason you need to pay 200% more for a house to put your kids into a non-nigger infested school.
Now if voat is willing to ignore all of that, they're on the road to being respectable in the eyes of the globalists who are rubbing their hands at the goyim's naivety.
7560595? ago
There's a big difference between between supporting free speech and supporting hate speech. subs like /v/niggers and /v/fatpeoplehate should be allowed, but they should not in any way be supported by the site. This means the only time you see them is if you're in the sub. They should never be featured anywhere else.
7561723? ago
No there isn't. Hate speech isn't a real thing. It all is just free speech.
~HomerSimpson
7562711? ago
Let me put it another way - there's a big difference between allowing hate speech and supporting it. The way they try to discuss racial problems doesn't help anything, and it makes voat look like shit. Sooner or later the money is going to run out, and this place will cease to exist. It's something to think about. The problems with racism against whites by blacks won't be solved with racism from whites against blacks. It's time to grow up, or vanish. Your choice.
7560728? ago
People say that use it to censor opinions they don't like even though it harms no one.
Who said they had to be supported? Voat is just a platform, like Reddit once claimed to be.
7560856? ago
Both those subs are hate speech, there's no other way to describe them. I think voat HAS to allow hate speech in order to continue being a free speech haven. It just doesn't need to pay any real attention to it.
7554602? ago
I'd prefer to be feared more than seen as a "respectable", I don't mean feared in the menacing, truly scary meaning, I mean feared because you can't lie to me. We've all had that teacher, parent, or boss that's heard it all before that only a moron would try lying, that's what I mean.
7554009? ago
I think the standard Voat sets is that you should be completely free to say what you just said, so long as your community isn't doing anything illegal.
I think there is a market growing for Voat and tolerance for freedom of expression.