You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

7553321? ago

...and it tarnishes burnishes Voat’s public image.

Voat is still acquiring its own public image. v/niggers does more than tarnish Voat. It's a defining characteristic of Voat's 'No Censorship and Freedom of Speech Model' and, by extension, Voat Inc.

7553678? ago

There's this strange desire among some members on voat to become "respected" and they think to do that we need a good public image. The only way voat ever would have a "good public image" is to be completely cucked. To start with, if you want to be respectable in the eyes of the establishment (e.g. liberals) a good place to start is by ignoring what niggers do to our society.

Niggers destroy our cities, they violently attack whites, they vote for destructive liberals who raise our taxes to pay for niggers to breed without working. With affirmative action they push more qualified students out of college, force more qualified workers out of jobs, force more qualified contractors out of government contracts. Niggers are the reason your wife needs to feel anxiety when walking home in a major city. Niggers are the reason you need to pay 200% more for a house to put your kids into a non-nigger infested school.

Now if voat is willing to ignore all of that, they're on the road to being respectable in the eyes of the globalists who are rubbing their hands at the goyim's naivety.

7554009? ago

I think the standard Voat sets is that you should be completely free to say what you just said, so long as your community isn't doing anything illegal.

I think there is a market growing for Voat and tolerance for freedom of expression.