...and it tarnishes burnishes Voat’s public image.
Voat is still acquiring its own public image. v/niggers does more than tarnish Voat. It's a defining characteristic of Voat's 'No Censorship and Freedom of Speech Model' and, by extension, Voat Inc.
There's this strange desire among some members on voat to become "respected" and they think to do that we need a good public image. The only way voat ever would have a "good public image" is to be completely cucked. To start with, if you want to be respectable in the eyes of the establishment (e.g. liberals) a good place to start is by ignoring what niggers do to our society.
Niggers destroy our cities, they violently attack whites, they vote for destructive liberals who raise our taxes to pay for niggers to breed without working. With affirmative action they push more qualified students out of college, force more qualified workers out of jobs, force more qualified contractors out of government contracts. Niggers are the reason your wife needs to feel anxiety when walking home in a major city. Niggers are the reason you need to pay 200% more for a house to put your kids into a non-nigger infested school.
Now if voat is willing to ignore all of that, they're on the road to being respectable in the eyes of the globalists who are rubbing their hands at the goyim's naivety.
There's a big difference between between supporting free speech and supporting hate speech. subs like /v/niggers and /v/fatpeoplehate should be allowed, but they should not in any way be supported by the site. This means the only time you see them is if you're in the sub. They should never be featured anywhere else.
Both those subs are hate speech, there's no other way to describe them. I think voat HAS to allow hate speech in order to continue being a free speech haven. It just doesn't need to pay any real attention to it.
view the rest of the comments →
7553321? ago
Voat is still acquiring its own public image. v/niggers does more than tarnish Voat. It's a defining characteristic of Voat's 'No Censorship and Freedom of Speech Model' and, by extension, Voat Inc.
7553678? ago
There's this strange desire among some members on voat to become "respected" and they think to do that we need a good public image. The only way voat ever would have a "good public image" is to be completely cucked. To start with, if you want to be respectable in the eyes of the establishment (e.g. liberals) a good place to start is by ignoring what niggers do to our society.
Niggers destroy our cities, they violently attack whites, they vote for destructive liberals who raise our taxes to pay for niggers to breed without working. With affirmative action they push more qualified students out of college, force more qualified workers out of jobs, force more qualified contractors out of government contracts. Niggers are the reason your wife needs to feel anxiety when walking home in a major city. Niggers are the reason you need to pay 200% more for a house to put your kids into a non-nigger infested school.
Now if voat is willing to ignore all of that, they're on the road to being respectable in the eyes of the globalists who are rubbing their hands at the goyim's naivety.
7560595? ago
There's a big difference between between supporting free speech and supporting hate speech. subs like /v/niggers and /v/fatpeoplehate should be allowed, but they should not in any way be supported by the site. This means the only time you see them is if you're in the sub. They should never be featured anywhere else.
7560728? ago
People say that use it to censor opinions they don't like even though it harms no one.
Who said they had to be supported? Voat is just a platform, like Reddit once claimed to be.
7560856? ago
Both those subs are hate speech, there's no other way to describe them. I think voat HAS to allow hate speech in order to continue being a free speech haven. It just doesn't need to pay any real attention to it.