You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

NOMOCHOMO ago

You've got to be kidding me.

the palm/back of the hand are uniquely identifiable signatures.

You're actually asking Voat's hypersecurity focused userbase to dox themeselves for all artificial intelligence bots/intelligence agencies to see?

We already have facial based image recognition, gait based unique identifiers, and even unique typing/clicking signatures that Google uses to verify captchas

@think- @vindicator @shewhomustbeobeyed @argosciv we need an alternative platform asap

PuttItOut ago

You're insane. Welcome!

NOMOCHOMO ago

(((Ad Hominem)))

ahhh damnit. I'll fall on the sword. I do need a new VPN. Don't burn me Putt

https://i.imgtc.ws/XtA7gZ2.jpg

written with my left hand so you bastards don't get a handwriting sample either

PuttItOut ago

LOL, it's funny because it's true. Left hand, glove, burner phone. Only Voat.

NOMOCHOMO ago

Speaking of true, is there any truth to this users claim:

I guess you missed my point that putt got DHS fed warrants served and now is seizing QRV.

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3232959/18748441

&

In light of his recent revelation that the Department of Homeland Security has served him with warrants

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3232959/18746272

P.S. I'm srsly entering the contest. I have a bunch of domains I ought to register before 2020

PuttItOut ago

At this point why would anyone believe Q people? Especially mods. If clown world is a thing, they are living it as well.

srayzie ago

Are you talking about QRV mods? Or all Q people, especially mods?

argosciv ago

@PuttItOut, look who is making the claims...

9-11 is not a "Q person", he/she is a v/realProtectVoat turd. This should tell anyone reading this, plenty about the reason for such asinine claims.

Consider then, why NOMOCHOMO would try to stir the pot using 9-11's bullshit, given also NOMO's initial response in this submission which o course rings true to the same "VOAT COMPROMISED!" narrative that v/realProtectVoat goons push.

@Crensch @kevdude @Vindicator

NOMOCHOMO ago

@crensch @kevdude @Vindicator

which of course rings true ...

(((foregone conclusion + implication + association)))

if you look at my comment history, I first asked @9-11 to substantiate their claims.

When they didn't, and Putt replies to me, I'm not going to waste the opportunity to ask him directly.

@shewhomustbeobeyed

Vindicator ago

Ok Nomo. Just a piece of advice: the way you are doing this looks shillish. You get in Putt's face, quoting a narrative pushed by one of the most malicious Voat attackers, in a similar rude, confrontational way, only one Title Herehour after asking 9-11 to substantiate his claims. It's not like you waited long or even investigated it at all for yourself before launching your own

(((foregone conclusion + implication + association)))

Furthermore, it's a follow-on to your statement that:

we need an alternative platform asap

Another huge shill talking point.

So yeah. @Argosciv, @Crensch, me -- and anyone else who seriously cares about who is trying to undermine Voat and how -- is going to take note.

I'm also noting that you replied to Putt's good natured "You're insane" with the claim he was Jewing you with an ad hominem attack.

Hard to tell if you were joking there, since here you clearly use the same approach to seriously imply Argo is out of line and merely running Jew smear tactics against you.

You also comment as if Argo somehow should have known you were not aligned with 9-11, despite the fact that you only made the comment to 9-11 an hour before, deep in a completely different thread on a completely different board. That is disingenuous.


@shewhomustbeobeyed

NOMOCHOMO ago

the way you are doing this looks shillish

This bullshit again? I AM ASKING QUESTIONS. Why are you discouraging that?

You get in Putt's face,

You mean my comment on his post in which he's asking for ADDITIONAL DATA from Voaters? The one where I tagged you? Boy I'm sure invading Putt's personal space. I'm a big meanie.

quoting a narrative pushed by one of the most malicious Voat attackers,

What "narrative" am I quoting? I gave my own opinion, then I directly quoted somebody else's recent accusations and asked Putt if there was any truth to it.

in a similar rude, confrontational way

How long have you been on the internet? ....And how long have you been on Voat? I was confrontational. How was I "rude", and why does that matter?

only one hour after asking 9-11 to substantiate his claims. It's not like you waited long or even investigated it at all for yourself before launching your own

I spent that one hour independently trying to verify those claims you presumptive douche. SearchVoat, Putts history, and other tools didn't turn anything up.

Some of us don't like "waiting" or "trusting the plan". 9-11 didn't respond, to me, but Putt did (albeit in a different thread). Of course I'm going to ask the other party involved in the accusation. That's a fundamental part of an INVESTIGATION.

Considering the accusation was Voat is pozzed, and an hour later Putt begins a VPN giveaway, I don't think it's an irrelevant concern. The TIMING was the REASON I asked the question.

we need an alternative platform asap

Another huge shill talking point.

So yeah. @Argosciv, @Crensch, me -- and anyone else who seriously cares about who is trying to undermine Voat and how -- is going to take note.

Setting up alternative platforms asap isn't a "shill talking point". It's basic security and common sense. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. Nobody has explained why we should trust PIA's parent company. Voat can be undermined on a corporate and administrative level as well.

I'm also noting that you replied to Putt's good natured "You're insane" with the claim he was Jewing you with an ad hominem attack

He was Jewing me with an Ad Hominem attack you silly boomer :)

You also comment as if Argo somehow should have known you were not aligned with 9-11, despite the fact that you only made the comment to 9-11 an hour before, deep in a completely different thread on a completely different board. That is disingenuous.

Argos dedicated a subverse to me called v/lampshadematerial in which he cross references the timestamps of my posts to other users to try to accuse me of using alternative accounts.

https://voat.co/v/Lampshadematerial/2934223/15796315

This is your comment from 5 months ago from one of those threads. You know that Argos closely follows my comment history trying to "catch me"

I am not being disingenuous, you are being dishonest @vindicator