You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

frankenglock ago

I used to have an imported British version, the L1A1 (with a stupid thumbhole stock) back in the 90's. The L1A1's were nice because they retained the folding charging handle and the ability to use inch or metric magazines. At first magazines were rather expensive, so having the ability to reliably use either was great. Eventually they were almost giving magazines away.

It was imported by the infamous CAI, but I seemed to have gotten a good one because it functioned reliably and the open sights were very consistent, giving me 6" groups at 300 yards. It was actually very ergonomic, even thought it looked bulky. It wasn't, it was actually rather thin and well balanced for the way it looked, and takedown and cleaning was really easy.

The problems I had with it were the action top cover would not allow a scope to be mounted without getting some special pieces, which back in the 90's were hard to get. It seems like all the FN FAL's I see today have scopes. I could not get mine to keep a zero with any of the mounts or scopes available back then.

The USA really missed out by not adopting the FAL. I think it was never popular in the US because, unfortunately, it wasn't in any big blockbuster action movies and never got any screen time or exposure. The only movie that I can remember the FN FAL being in was "The Wild Geese".

I eventually sold the FAL to fund the purchase of what was soon to be several DPMS .308 rifles in various barrel lengths and stock setups. Not having to deal with the imported rifle bullshit regulations with the thumbhole stocks and imported parts (since domestic FAL parts were still unicorn farts in the early 2000's) were nonexistent. The DPMS pattern .308 rifles shared the same trigger parts, grips, stocks, etc as their smaller cousins the AR-15.

clamhurt_legbeard ago

the open sights were very consistent, giving me 6" groups at 300 yards.

u/nadeshda you see this

.308 at 300 yds still has enough power to blow open a head like a watermelon

I could not get mine to keep a zero with any of the mounts or scopes available back then.

top covers not designed to do anything but keep dust out and parts in

same as on the ak and sks

it can be done but only with modifications

.308 ar is a good system especially in america

when i get around to buying a semi auto .308 id like to get a keltec rfb

but the fal will always have it beat for its history

frankenglock ago

I agree 100%, with every point.

I would love to shoot an RFB, but they are almost impossible to find locally, and I'm not going to pay over MSRP just to try one.

Since I have other AR's, the semi .308 DPMS were a good deal for spare parts, the same ergonomics, and troubleshooting is the same since they are both DI.

But yeah, every time someone brings up the FAL in a post or casual conversation, I remember back to my L1A1 and how much fun it was to shoot.

Most people at the range had no idea what it was, but many of the old-timers respected that it was .308, even if it didn't have a single bit of wood on it. I remember a couple of them saying that it would be nice in walnut. I would tell them yes, but because of the import regulations, I could not do that without replacing several other parts with American made parts, which weren't available at the time. I had a set of black plastic handguards that I spray painted with a black, sand paper like paint that was very easy to keep your hands on.

clamhurt_legbeard ago

i actually found an rfb in a gun store

it was surprisingly heavy but compact

Nadeshda ago

I clocked it ;)