@ExpertShitposter writes:
Zyklon has been sperging out with pings and threats against kids. Everyone called him out on his shit. However, anyone can block him.
Why look at that! He's right! Honestly, I cannot argue with this. Well done!
Crensch has engaged in reddit style moderation with pre-emptive bans based on association. No one can stop his bans.
Well, let's see how this pans out in a nice little Voat graphic:
|
Can be blocked |
Zyklon_b |
✅ |
Crensch |
✅ |
REEEE U CAN BLOCK ZYKLON REEEEE -> You can block Crensch and GA, too.
Or crensch heavy handed banning behavior makes it normal for everyone to ban anyone in defense against "shills".
All you lazy fucks had to do was turn on your weakest link with the fervor you turn on mods that don't toe the line you draw for them. But he wasn't your weakest link, was he? He was an art project - like the "art" students in the towers before (((9-11))).
Keep in mind, when 2020 comes around, r/the_donald will probably finally get banned from reddit for real this time, and we will potentially become minorities compared to fresh reddit refugees. And this time they won't have a home to run back to, and won't be BTFO'd as easily as last time.
They won't be BTFO'd at all. I'll create a subverse for them and run roughshod all over anyone still stuck in the bubble of (((free speech))) as you know it.
Most people agree that both of them are wrong, but who is a bigger threat to voat?
Do everyone here a favor and define this "voat" that I'm a threat to. I'd love to have that discussion soon.
@Trigglypuff writes:
Goats used to pride themselves on having thick skins.
But also wrote:
That’s when it got personal tbh.
Where's that thick skin? You took the revealing of a PM you ADMITTED made you sound like a loon, and plastered images she's previously removed from her other accounts all over a custom-built subverse. YOU think you have room to talk about thick skin? Or about women being emotional? Or how there are NO women on the internet?
It made you sound like a loon? Yeah, it did. So much so that I had the kind of cognitive dissonance you get when an AXIOM of your life is brought into question by something so solid you cannot dismiss it.
YOU did that. I don't even know how someone can manage to look so much like a goddamned shill/liar even when they are and are low-IQ. It was mind-boggling. It tripped nearly every red flag my mind could be bothered to muster through the state of shock it was in.
Even your re-reading of it got you to that conclusion; and now the (((emotional woman))) of voat has to go around talking shit about other women to feel better about herself.
We were fucking iconoclasts.
We were... in our bubble of internal logic. Now I am, outside of your bubble of logic.
All I see now is faggotry over beliefs
Beliefs like:
Hence Crensch is more dangerous to free speech
That's a belief, is it not?
What about this one:
q is definitely a Jewish lie
... which has been used to excuse any number of attacks on Q people, who have, to their credit, laughed with you almost invariably, to the point of referring to themselves as "qtards" now and then?
Consistency.
view the rest of the comments →
ExpertShitposter ago
Why do you even mention that? I wrote that your bans cant be stopped, not that you cant be blocked.
Well congratulations, you have become the biggest redditor faggot on voat. Next thing i expect from you is a conversion to national socialist wahhabi islam.
Simply voat in the state that it's now. Also: https://i.imgtc.ws/VYaeBVC.png Only 50 votes, but users overwhelmingly thing that you are a worse than zyklon. Now that's an achievement!
Not gonna comment on the triggs stuff.
Consistency of faggotry.
Crensch ago
Oh, maybe @rotteuxx would like to have a crack at it, since he's SO proud of his badge of honor for dogpiling an overemotional woman when he had one right there beside him the whole time!
Rotteuxx ago
Replying to a day old comment by @expertshitposter because a retarded thought sprouted in your mind ?
What can I say about @Trigglypuff :
She didn't create drama all by her lonesome self.
She never sent tit pics by PM to gain anyone's loyalty. She's gained the respect of her friends by being herself and helping others with her talents throughout the years.
She didn't come at me with alts she stupidly forgot I knew were hers by her own admission.
She tried to help by giving her opinion but got shit on and had PMs publicly displayed by a blubbery jewess as an attack.
She didn't just do back to back sperg outs fed by emotionally irrational thoughts. She got pissed off and retaliated once because she got fucked with.
She doesn't claim one thing while doing the other :
"We haven't been feeding the trolls"
"I don't use alts to do bad, mmmmkay ?
So what about her ?
Crensch ago
Neither did srayzie.
Your deeds happened before any of that came out - and to my knowledge they were originally sent to someone that did not have any power anyway.
Yeah, then she wrote this which showed to more than one person that she was likely part of the overall problem. Look at that thing. It's like an admission of being one of them.
Sounds like you're taking the internet too srsly, shitposter.
That's not help. What she wrote was damage control. Ask @kevdude if he knows what "wedge" she's talking about, because neither srayzie nor I did. In fact, here's what I wrote to him:
Oh, right, because HER kids weren't being attacked, and it wasn't HER problem that there was somebody around her that was threatening kids and doxxing them to pedophiles.
HAHAHAHA. She made an entire subverse about it. What a fucking pussy pass you're giving her! This is so funny.
She sure as hell mocks a woman for doing exactly what she's doing - only the other woman had a better reason for it.
Imagine what must have been in that PM that caused her SUCH emotional distress that she would make subverse altar to a woman being attacked by zyklon.
Top kek, white knight. Top kek.
Your hormone slit knew her previous PM made her sound like a nutcase, and both of you have thinner skins than the Q people you consistently attack.
"Muh she attacked me with alts"
"Muh she showed a PM to others!"
Did it even occur to you that the usernames in that PM didn't once attack her for lying about them? Zero damage control was done. Why do you think that is?
Rotteuxx ago
Top KeK, nice diatribe. Stopped reading right there.
Keep on sperging out faggot, by all means write another 100 lines.
Crensch ago
Keep giving out those pussy passes to Triggly in order to keep a firm image of a 'real man' in your mind.