Here is Truth. They have to deal with US! Don't forget it is us that they fear. They are a small minority with a megaphone. WE are powerful and MUCH larger. Patriots vs. Traitors.
I don't go to movies and canceled cable. However, maybe we should be actively monitoring for city names, places in big blockbuster movies and calling attention to it to actively pray against this messenging....
Posted automatically (#82369) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
I'd always heard that the parents supposedly got their mortgages paid off. I have no sauce as most of the Sandy Hook stuff got scrubbed off the internet at least on the search engines I used at the time! My hope is that all the FF are revealed in the upcoming months! It's my hope that more info will be acceptable if and when people realize how much they have been lied to for so long.
A lot of real interesting stuff about Sandy Hook disappeared from the net. It wasn't to protect the official story from scrutiny, it was "for the kids" of course. :)
Okay so Sandy Hook is mentioned in the Dark Knight Rises, the prop master for the movie also happens to be from Newtown dies in a bizarre accident in Newtown. There's a mass shooting in Sandy Hook, and there's a mass shooting at a screening of the Dark Knight Rises, the perpetrator of which no longer has a public whereabouts in the prison system after he was transferred out of state, meaning no journalists or psychologists can interview him about his motivation so the MSM can get away with whatever contrived BS they printed about why he did it.
James Holmes a Manson eyed, looks like a queer beer, allegedly suffering from (gender?) Dysphoric Mania, on psychiatric meds, manages to ENTER through an EMERGENCY EXIT (you know those one way doors that trigger alarms when opened, and normally have no way to open from the outside for SECURITY REASONS) and uses tear gas grenades (thank you FBI for providing them!) and shoots up the theatre.
The college he was enrolled in a neurobiology program and had usage of LSD and other psychiatric meds like another farmed college graduate mass murderer (UNABOMBER) and basically anyone involved in James Holmes's past is entirely silent about him (like UNABOMBER), despite staff having concerns about his mental health (like UNABOMBER), and his social isolation (like UNABOMBER).
Don't forget about Heath Ledger's sacrificial, I mean..overdose death immediately after completing the filming of the biggest role of his entire career.
I've always heard that the rules of the game are (((they))) must tell you what they intend to do beforehand. Of course in their twisted way, its all obscured by symbolism and hidden in movies. Its all obvious if you know what to look for, but you need the legend/key and it takes work. (((They)) count on human laziness and use that against us.
It’s all staged bullshit, so of course they like to insert in-jokes mocking that. Nobody dies, nobody gets hurt.
Nobody died at Sandy Hook. Nobody died at the Boston Bombings (featuring Dshokar ‘Joker’ Tsarnaev), nobody died at the Aurora Batman screening (featuring the Joker-haired perp).
This is all before we come onto more significant events like 9/11 and the JFK ‘assassination’, also staged, also fake, nobody died or got hurt. The media told you otherwise and that’s the only reason you think so.
If you still haven’t realised yet, the common thread is that it’s all a joke. The people running the show enjoy a good laugh too.
The VicSim report, a spin-off of September Clues (also well worth watching)
Yep, empty. Perhaps never fully populated at any point after construction. There were probably a few floors operational to keep up appearances, plus the lobby and the restaurant at the top — I visited that myself, I know it was real.
Apart from that, just empty and unfinished floors with lighting to give the impression of a functioning office building. This is why there is no office furniture visible in any debris photos. The towers were purpose-built to be brought down on that day, which had great occult significance.
By the time they fell they were fully evacuated and empty, as was most of downtown Manhattan, and demolished in a conventional manner, shrouded in military smokescreens and electronic jamming equipment to prevent anyone recording what was actually happening.
Meanwhile the media played prerecorded CGI footage of airplanes hitting the towers and CGI demolition footage of them collapsing in spectacular style. Nothing on the TV that day actually happened, all footage showing airplanes hitting towers and towers crashing down is fake and prefabricated.
The documentary September Clues unravels it completely.
The same folks responsible for September Clues also put together a compelling analysis of the ‘victims’ of 9/11, which they call the VicSim Report. In short, they prove conclusively that the photos of the alleged victims are photoshopped fakes, and follow ups to locate these people reveals no evidence that anyone died. FOIA requests lead to no official death records, or in several cases evidence that they were already dead.
It was a con job, a magic trick. The elites responsible pulled off a truly impressive bit of media fakery, but on closer inspection it’s pretty rough around the edges and easy to see how they did it.
Q always says we have more than we know. I think movies are a major part of that. I posted a quick primer a few days ago on how to decode them using Ad Astra but it didn't do very well.
I believe you are correct. The hard part is its virtually impossible to pick out the truth from all the Hollywood hocus pocus. Occasionally we'll get a crumb, like the movie 'Contact' and the looking glass project, but even then what part is real and what part is fake?
There are 2 ways to achieve this. The first, and most common way is to truly be 51% good. 'good/evil' is based off of a service to others, or service to self mentality. We all get to choose as individuals.
'Good' would be 51% good as a soul. You would follow the idea that 'Service to others, is service to self'.
'Evil" follows the idea that 'Service to self, is service to others'.
Both ways of living can result in personal ascension, but only one path is considered our creators path, where as the other is the path of Satan.
Basically you can be good at being selfish and worrying about what's best for you. Focusing on what will benifit the well-being of yourself above all else.
Conversely you can trust in the Creator, and life in general and always do what is best for huminty, which in turn will be best for you.
(((They))) believe to achieve their goal of ascension they must be 99% evil. The line "It doesn't matter if you believe this to be true because (((They))) do to their very core". Is often used in some variation.
If you fall somewhere in between good and evil you get to reincarnate here and try again. This happens as many times as it's needed for you to ascend into a higher evolved, and more advanced form of consciousness.
Im going to have to correct you on a couple things. 1 there are no amount of works or services to others that you can do to get you into heaven and 2. There is no reincarnation. You get one life one earth and when you die you either go to heaven if you believe in and give your life to Jesus whom bore all of our sins so that we may be righteous in his Father's sight or you dont and you go to hell. No reincarnation no purgatory.
Did you know Jesus spoke of, and was a teacher of reincarnation? Jesus was an example for all of us so that we could witness, in the flesh, our full potential as humans. He does not want us to worship him. Any of the words you get about Jesus are another man's perspective on his deeds and acts. Jesus himself was humble and simply here to show us how service to others over service to self is the path to salvation. Christ conscious...
Well i asked for Scripture to prove this. But i doubt anyone can show that proof because it is not in the Bible. So prove me wrong and give me Scripture where Jesus taught or even said it. And you cant use his resurrection as proof of reincarnation. That is totally different. Come on some one give some evidence
1 million dollars to the one that can prove Jesus taught reincarnation
You are right, it is not in the Bible, it's in one of the books the Church took out because it didn't go along with their narrative of control. I will find a reference as to where this info is located and share it. Stay tuned!
Interesting read i will say. But thats not fully convincing that there is reincarnation. Ill put it this way if we are all reincarnated and we are born over and over. The same soul but not the same person as this article states why was there even a need for Jesus to come and take our sins away? I mean we are going to be born again so there is no need for us to be saved from our sins right? And it mentions Elijah. Well Elijah never died he was takin up into heaven without dying. Again interesting read but doesn't prove reincarnation is real. Sorry
Jesus did not come to take your sin's away. You are not born with sin. You are born as pure and loving as possible. You only take on what other people put on you, or what you think others expect from you As you go through life trapped trying to live up to someone else's exspectations.
God loves you unconditionally, and does not judge. Sin is a human construct used as a way to control us all. Jesus was only here too show us the power of love over fear, and how awesome we can all be. You do not have to do anything to find salvation, except unlock what is already within your self by understanding You. Your real self, not feeding your ego. God doesn't work on the same level as our petty little egos and is of pure Love.
You should probably read the Bible sir. God made Adam and Eve without sin. Yet they listened to the devil and corrupted themselves which brought on death. So every offspring from then on was born with the sin nature. This is the very reason Jesus came. To take our sin away. That is why he went to the cross. There was no reason for him to become human otherwise
Luke 9:18-20 18And it came to pass, as he was alone praying, his disciples were with him: and he asked them, saying, Whom say the people that I am? 19They answering said, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others say, that one of the old prophets is risen again. 20He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The Christ of God.
There’s a ton. Then you look into the differences between Pharisees and Saduccees, how the big argument was regarding reincarnation.
There’s a ton. There’s more proof that Jesus taught reincarnation than there is for the existence of hell
Sorry but that Scripture you gave has nothing to do with reincarnation. I know you highlighted risen again. But thats not even close to eluding to Jesus teaching reincarnation. "Some say the prophet of old has risen again" here is a little known fact. Jesus was always the Father's son. Even at the foundation of the earth. Do you remember the story in the old Testament about the 3 that were put in the fiery furnace. They didnt burn and when they looked inside the furnace they saw 4 not three men. The 4th one was Jesus. And this was before he was actually born into this world. So no that doesn't mean reincarnation. Try again.
You aren’t an educated Christian—and this isn’t an attack. When faced with biblical reincarnation Christians are ignorant because they don’t study the Bible.
Jesus Christ himself said that John the Baptist was Elijah reincarnated in Matthew 11:7-14.
Again, loads more info on reincarnation than there is for the existence of Hell.
7 And as they departed, Jesus began to say unto the multitudes concerning John, What went ye out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken with the wind?
8 But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft raiment? behold, they that wear soft clothing are in kings' houses.
9 But what went ye out for to see? A prophet? yea, I say unto you, and more than a prophet.
10 For this is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee.
11 Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
14 And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come
Ok so verse 14 does is not literally interpreted to meant that John is elias reincarnated. You are interpreting wrong. He is saying he is like elias
Niv version 14 And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come. Notice the word "the" before elias. He was not elias reincarnated but a prophet likened to elias.
Ha, ok I get it. It’s hard to get through your cognitive dissonance so let’s try again with Matthew 17 and try to explain away the prophecy of Malachi that explicitly says Elijah will be reincarnated before Jesus comes back.
10 And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?
11 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
12 But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.
13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
Again that Scripture says nothing or implies nothing about reincarnation.
Also Elijah was takin into heaven while he was still alive. You cant reincarnate a man that never died.
But again ill say 2 things. If reincarnation is real then there was no reason for Jesus to come and suffer to take our sins on himself. No reason for him to go to the cross and die and be Resurrected 3 days later. If we are all reincarnated and we have have to go through this life multiple times turn to Jesus be saved multiple times there is no reason for Jesus to be around there's no reason for the resurrection there's no reason for it at all because we just go through life over and over and over again. See the dilemma and the reincarnation Theory. It makes zero sense. But I will go a step further in Revelation when Jesus comes back out of heaven with the armies of heavenly host angels it says that's when the Rapture happens the first the dead in Christ will rise up out of their graves and they will have bodies again made incorruptible and then those living believing in Christ their bodies will be turned incorruptible so you telling me how if you die and your reincarnated how and why would bodies dead Souls come out of Graves and become alive again if we are reincarnated it's because we are not reincarnated now I've just proven more times that The Reincarnation theory is a lie
Perhaps you are missing something extra special about Jesus. Reincarnation is not simply a shot in the dark. You have chosen you path ahead of time. The goal is to literally evolve a step closer to the creator. You are given free will as a way to allow for grow, or regress.
Is it possible that Jesus was so special, and so in tune with the creator that his path was to complete his cycle here on Earth in one try? This would lead to him evolving as a soul and unlocking the potential we all carry inside on his first try. Perhaps he was here to PROVE to us that reincarnation, however real or not, is not needed. We do not need to figure it over 50 lifetimes, but only 1.
Very few people have glimpsed into the power Jesus opened up within himself. His complete understanding of the path the creator has made available to all of us, is avaible right now. All it takes is a unbreakable relationship with God, your fellow man, unconditional love for all, and putting service to others above the petty personal needs most people seek to this very day.
Jesus was sent here as a template, but it seems many view him as an excuse to take a little less personal responsibility for thier own growth, likely seeing his vast understanding and application of Love and forgiveness to all, as an unattainable feat for a regular mortal human. This is short sighted. Everyone of us is capable of an enormous amount of godly, unconditional, manifesting ability to walk his very path of practicing the word of Love, and the action of forgiveness of all. True forgiveness, especially that of ourselves.
You have to take into account other cultures as well, and ascension beliefs/practices that are recorded and witness countless times throughout the history of all people. You cannot simply close off reincarnation to the teachings of what you believe is the full unadulterated truth of the Bible.
Have you researched the rainbow body phenom that takes place in budism? Even in Christianity they speak of a harvest to come where those who have fully embraced and practice the very actions and have tapped into the same powers within us all that guidef Jesus.
More about Jesus and your claim that it doesn't make sense to attach reincarnation to him. What if I were to say you are right, but not because reincarnation is a lie. Perhaps he completed his full cycle and achieved ascension in just one lifetime?
You may be taking some words from the Bible a little too literally. The souls of men do not rest here on Earth when you complete your journey, only flesh and bone stay Souls are freed upon death, but can also be freed while you are living.
To wrap this up, perhaps you are not giving yourself enough credit and putting too much stock in another man's actions, instead of believing in yourself fully. Maybe you too can do the very same things that Jesus himself showed us long ago that we can all.do this very moment!
Tear down the walls of deception You have built up inside of you, and free your soul from the attachments that are reliant on another man's storey to be interpreted a specific way.that can easily lead to magnificent misunderstandings! Trust in thyself.
That scripture SPECIFICALLY says that Jesus confirmed John was Elijah reincarnated/reborn
Malachi SPECIFICALLY says that in order for Jesus to come FIRST Elijah must come and set the stage.
Basically, if you don't believe in the malachi professy and you don't believe that John the Baptist was Elijah, you don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.
It's not complicated.
Now i'm not a big fan of churches and even the most cucked pastors admit that John the Baptist was Elijah 'reborn' they don't use 'reincarnation' and they don't talk about it afterwards, however, it's clear that reborn is the same thing as reincarnation
Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:
Malachi:4:5
Notice " the coming of the great and Dreadful day of the Lord" this is not speaking about Jesus being born this is speaking about Jesus Second Coming as a conquering King and Elijah must come before. Specifically Elijah is supposed to be one of the two witnesses or the spirit of Elijah will be like one of the two witnesses that Revelation speaks of. It has nothing to do with reincarnation this piece of scripture that I just explain to you refute your reincarnation Theory.
Let's go back and look at Matthew because I have to correct you on something.
And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.
Matthew:11:14
Notice in Matthew Jesus is talking about Elias not Elijah. Those were two different men in the Bible. Remember again Elijah never died he was taken up into heaven and he had passed shall we say like the Baton on to Elias. Can you speak about Elijah and Matthew there is no Elijah it's Elias again two different men. Again neither scripture is talking anything about reincarnation and you have said there are plenty of other places that mentions reincarnation so but those other scriptures out there that you say talk about reincarnation and I will explain to you what they really mean
I stand corrected i was thinking of Elisha. But it still doesn't change the fact that Malachi talks about Jesus second coming as a king. Funny how you only address the name of Elijah and not try and pick apart the rest of my comment. And then attack me by saying " im not a Christian" and saying haha i won the debate because you got a name wrong. Clearly you know im right and the only thing you had to come back with was the name of Elijah.
you only address the name of Elijah and not try and pick apart the rest of my comment
Because the rest of your comments don't matter. You don't confuse Elisha with Elias if you know the bible. You don't know it, so anything you say is Grade A Retarded.
Oh but they do matter. They matter more than me getting a name mistaken for another name. And just because i had a brain fart about a name does not mean i don't know the Bible. You sir dont have a leg to stand on with your theory because if you did you would address the rest of my comments. But because i proved my point and you have zero rebuttal. You do what liberals do when faced with the truth and facts. You attack and say your stupid and retarded.
Mate. Ask your pastor and don’t bias your question, just be honest use the Matthew quote and ask if he thinks John the Baptist is Elijah and if not, why not
Mate John the Baptist is not literally Elijah reincarnated. He may have had the spirit of Elijah but he was not Elijah.
Elijah never died. He was taken straight into heaven. Also when Jesus was getting ready to ascend into heaven after walking the earth for 40 days after his Resurrection the disciple saw moses and Elijah together. So if john was Elijah reborn then he could not turn back into Elijah. Also Elijah is supposed to be 1 of the 2 witnesses that come back during the tribulation period. As per reincarnation you cant 1 be reincarnated if you never died 2 be reincarnated as a different person and then return after that back into your original person. So Elijah goes to heaven without dying then gets reincarnated as John the Baptist then is again seen as Elijah during Jesus Ascension into heaven and then come back as Elijah as one of the two witnesses.
And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,
Matthew:17:1And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
Matthew:17:2And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
He may have had the spirit of Elijah but he was not Elijah
The spirit of elijah, is reincarnation. You can't remember your previous life but have the spirit of your previous self.
So if john was Elijah reborn then he could not turn back into Elijah.
Yes he could. He was born on earth once, didn't die, and came back. Though yes you make a good point. Though ARGUABLY. Jesus dying and rising again IS reincarnation. By defintion.
So Elijah goes to heaven without dying then gets reincarnated as John the Baptist then is again seen as Elijah during Jesus Ascension into heaven and then come back as Elijah as one of the two witnesses.
John the Baptist/Elijah was killed at this point so reincarnation coming back, doesn't break the theory.
Ok so lets say in theory that john the Baptist was Elijah reborn. Let just say that. That would be one isolated incident of reincarnation. The only time it happened. Which still means it doesn't happen to all of us. And there is no reason to teach reincarnation if it was but for i specific incident. Again if it happens to all of us then there was no reason for Jesus to come and die on the cross. No reason for the Bible. No reason for any of it.
@Hello7 since you are a based christian I want your opinion and perhaps debate with op and me/native as well. Am I wrong? start with [–] 21734770? thats me
I'm not an authority; that would be the Word of God, and Jesus Christ is the Way, the Truth, and the Life. It is rather hard for me to tell who is who based on the anonymous tags, and I'm even thinking there are more than two people in this chain? But, regardless, the Bible does not teach reincarnation. The "spirit" (think in this case: role) of Elijah was upon John the Baptist.
God sent His only Son into this world, that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
He was sent to be God's mercy in the flesh. He completely fulfilled the Father's will (which is MERCY) throughout His life and ministry, culminating in the ultimate act of mercy which was taking the sins of mankind upon Himself and dying to take our place. Mankind is utterly depraved and fallen, and this world is passing away.
I can try, Law of One and its explanation is a bit tricky at times. I think the best way for us to understand it is from practice and experience, and getting a feel for these things as individuals.
The way I see it is as follows. When you do anything for someone, do you expect something back in return? Do you keep track of all the nice things you have done for people? Compare what you are doing to others, and judge other people in what they are, or are not doing? Do you have expectations attached to the outcome of any good deed you complete? If the answer is yes, you are choosing "Service to self, is service to others". If the answer is no, you have chosen "Service to others, is service to self".
There is a simple way to know which one you are orientated towards. Do a bunch of really nice things for someone in your life, especially someone you see as selfish, or self centered. After you complete each task or deed, do not say anything or expect anything in return. If they ask, or tell you they will return the favor, tell them that you will let them know if you genuinely need their help, but it is not necessary for them to do anything in return. When the day comes where you need assistance, and you turn to that person, and they say, "sorry, but no they can't", really pay attention to what emotions you experience. If you are genuinely indifferent, and your disposition doesn't change for the worst, and you are happy to continue helping them in the future, you are aligned towards "service to others, is service to self". If you get irritated or feel resentment because "you have done so many nice things for them", you are likely aligned towards "service to self, is service to others." I think a big part of it is whether the ego is involved with your acts of kindness or not. If it is you are likely service to self, if it is not you are likely service to others orientated.
This is my interpretation of this, I could be misunderstanding it, but that is the best I can explain it.
From all my readings, they always say do something to help others, and you'll get paid back.
Example, if you want money, give money away. Example: You want to feed 100,000 people, you'll find a way to earn money to feed them.
Its just 1 example of the many.
Back in the days, I used to help others a lot. These days, I just focus on myself more, and if anybody comes to me, I'll help them. Why? Because when I offer to help people, they are not requesting it, so I found out I they dont want help. Sometimes, even when people ask for help, they dont really want help, they just want to talk to someone.
The distortion lies in the fact that those who seek to serve the self are seen by the Law of One as precisely the same as those who seek to serve others, for are all not one? To serve yourself and to serve other is a dual method of saying the same thing, if you can understand the essence of the Law of One.
I re-read this, and it is still not completely clear to me the difference. The way I interpret is that under circumstances where the individual is of good heart and genuinely trying to do good, just put themselves before others, can still ascend in a positive light. However, I don't believe that this is the intention of (((Them). It seems that they have manipulated this point to serve themselves maliciously.
I understand that good/bad are not real outcomes and simply a matter of perspective, but it seems that (((They))) have taken this point and used it in their favor. Convincing themselves that what is being done is in service of some higher power that most people may not agree with.
Law of One is a bit confusing at times, so feel free to let me know if I'm completely missing the point.
(((They))) absolutely know that they are on the negative path, and are consciously working to corrupt the world, to polarize it negatively, and to achieve a negative harvest. They want to make as many people on Earth polarize to 95% service to self so that they can achieve a negative harvest to work in 4th density negative. It's like they are recruiting more people to their side.
I believe that the people at the very top of the power structure were basically working with Lucifer to provide negative catalyst to Earth to give us choice between the positive and negative path. Without the darkness, we wouldn't understand the light and there wouldn't be a clear choice. Hence what Lucifer was hired to do for Earth.
I wouldn't consider people like Hillary Clinton to be very much in tune with this... Although it could be a "loving" action to provide negative catalyst, most of these occultists are just monsters who enjoy the darkness. But I suppose they are allowed to enjoy the darkness.
Lucifer is also no longer present on Earth because his job was completed.
And it doesn't really matter any more, because it's become clear that the masses are starting to turn against the Cabal. In this time of the great awakening people are very quickly turning against the darkness of the Cabal when they see the truth.
You are correct, it is 95%, not 99% evil. 99% would be pretty tough to meet for a politician or public figure, wouldn't it?
As I've come to understand it the Law of One is directly connected to the basis of what (((They))) believe.
As I understand It the Law of One was taught to some of the earliest rulers in the Egyptian empire. It was not received as the source of the information had hoped, in the sense that the 'service to self' approach caught on for the royalty instead of 'service to others', as the source of the information had hoped.
That was the start of thousands of years of secret, and ill intentioned elites practicing thier religion in the shadows. When confronted, it was written off as a lie or conspiracy.
Don't use [their] memes. It's exactly what [they] want us to do. There is a reason Q never uses it...and instead sticks to killboxes. Lurk more, you're glowing.
Whatever dude, I can leave the commas off, doesn't make a shit, everyone knows what we're talking about. Parenthesis is not a meme, its a marker. What you're doing is shifting the subject, not relevant to the point. The only one glowing is you.
There is a reason Trump is passing laws to protect Jews. Its because their involvement will be so big that he has to protect the innocent Jews. Nobody is saying its all of them, but we know who owns the banks, hollywood, media, etc. It ain't blacks or whites.
There is a reason Trump is passing legislation to protect Jews. When the truth comes out, there will be so many of them guilty that it will cause a tidal wave of backlash against the Jewish community. Obviously all are not guilty of crimes, but most are guilty of attacking the Christian community in ways that simply piss people off and cause the desire for retribution. They have fought to remove 10 commandments from public display, same with Christmas displays and all things Christian, etc. As we say down South, "Them are fightin' words".
Correct. They see it as our problem if we do not understand the message. Even as evil as they are, they still have to deal with their own conscience. Deep down they all know they want to come back to the light.
The fact that they show us what they are going to do is to obtain our permission through deceit and symbolism. They don't just show us their plans to be pompous, they must do this to bend the universal laws of free will. It's a loophole they have understood for centuries.
21735690? ago
"Batman shooting"
21730500? ago
Jews posing as anons in here. Flooding with newage bullshit
21729049? ago
Nice dig...wow, i heard they leave clues for everything they do. this is another conformation.
21728949? ago
Here is Truth. They have to deal with US! Don't forget it is us that they fear. They are a small minority with a megaphone. WE are powerful and MUCH larger. Patriots vs. Traitors.
21727905? ago
I don't go to movies and canceled cable. However, maybe we should be actively monitoring for city names, places in big blockbuster movies and calling attention to it to actively pray against this messenging....
I feel like this is some crazy shit to say.
21727605? ago
Great find.
21727416? ago
Re-read these comments from 2012. People were just beginning to figure some of this out.
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2083415/pg1
21728387? ago
Just dont click the malware embedded in the ads on GLP
21726871? ago
Thank you for keeping this alive. We all need to be reminded of the great charade
21726817? ago
List.
Expect some of the links to be down friends, YT is banning all truth and anti Zion posts.
21951723? ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#82369) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
21728413? ago
You need the updated pic of the class of all those that didn't die which is 100% of the kids. it floats around on twitter from time to time.
21726263? ago
I'd always heard that the parents supposedly got their mortgages paid off. I have no sauce as most of the Sandy Hook stuff got scrubbed off the internet at least on the search engines I used at the time! My hope is that all the FF are revealed in the upcoming months! It's my hope that more info will be acceptable if and when people realize how much they have been lied to for so long.
21726255? ago
He also puts his hand right on "Sandy Hook" as he says "..so we can figure out how to bring it down" and then you hear a loud bang. (from the door).
Odd coincidence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2DBJLpOlM
21726744? ago
Someone has a very sharp eye for detail there. That's creepy in a very sick way. I wonder if the actors were in on it or whether it was just a prop.
21726415? ago
Holy crap, thank you!
21726087? ago
A lot of real interesting stuff about Sandy Hook disappeared from the net. It wasn't to protect the official story from scrutiny, it was "for the kids" of course. :)
21725332? ago
You all also need to know that the prop master for The Dark Knight Rises died in a car accident in Newtown (Sandy Hook).
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Newtown-man-dies-in-Stamford-accident-3465225.php
This rabbit hole is deep as fuck. I've been down it.
21726643? ago
Yeah those are weird coincidences.
Okay so Sandy Hook is mentioned in the Dark Knight Rises, the prop master for the movie also happens to be from Newtown dies in a bizarre accident in Newtown. There's a mass shooting in Sandy Hook, and there's a mass shooting at a screening of the Dark Knight Rises, the perpetrator of which no longer has a public whereabouts in the prison system after he was transferred out of state, meaning no journalists or psychologists can interview him about his motivation so the MSM can get away with whatever contrived BS they printed about why he did it.
James Holmes a Manson eyed, looks like a queer beer, allegedly suffering from (gender?) Dysphoric Mania, on psychiatric meds, manages to ENTER through an EMERGENCY EXIT (you know those one way doors that trigger alarms when opened, and normally have no way to open from the outside for SECURITY REASONS) and uses tear gas grenades (thank you FBI for providing them!) and shoots up the theatre.
The college he was enrolled in a neurobiology program and had usage of LSD and other psychiatric meds like another farmed college graduate mass murderer (UNABOMBER) and basically anyone involved in James Holmes's past is entirely silent about him (like UNABOMBER), despite staff having concerns about his mental health (like UNABOMBER), and his social isolation (like UNABOMBER).
21730461? ago
Don't forget about Heath Ledger's sacrificial, I mean..overdose death immediately after completing the filming of the biggest role of his entire career.
21730952? ago
I can't find a picture of him doing the eye of horus.
I think he was a truly brilliant actor, and all I've read on him makes him sound like a great guy and not the Hollywood fake.
So they killed him, because he wouldn't join the club.
George Carlin fucked their shit up pretty good, so has Mel Gibson. Imagine what Heath could have done to them. Everyone loved the guy.
21729669? ago
I believe the writer for Hunger Games is from Sandy Hook as well.
21730476? ago
Interesting.. Philip Seymoure Hoffman dies after filming Hunger Games. Heath Ledger dies immediately after filming Dark Knight.
Both the biggest roles of their careers.
21730264? ago
like a Mt Shasta, infested with DSers
21729978? ago
Wouldn't surprise me one bit.
That series is so blatantly one of these DS satanic ritual/acceptance crap.
21728446? ago
MK-Ultra
21730421? ago
Manhunt for Unabomber TV series (which is an incredibly good show, btw) had a whole episode on this.
21725255? ago
The old Roman maxim "Let him who can be fooled, be fooled".
21725022? ago
The batman movie being shown at the Aurora theatre, scene of another DS FF.
21729070? ago
nice dig.
21724984? ago
Serious upvote!
21724690? ago
I've always heard that the rules of the game are (((they))) must tell you what they intend to do beforehand. Of course in their twisted way, its all obscured by symbolism and hidden in movies. Its all obvious if you know what to look for, but you need the legend/key and it takes work. (((They)) count on human laziness and use that against us.
21730761? ago
What is a map?
What is a legend?
21730374? ago
It’s all staged bullshit, so of course they like to insert in-jokes mocking that. Nobody dies, nobody gets hurt.
Nobody died at Sandy Hook. Nobody died at the Boston Bombings (featuring Dshokar ‘Joker’ Tsarnaev), nobody died at the Aurora Batman screening (featuring the Joker-haired perp).
This is all before we come onto more significant events like 9/11 and the JFK ‘assassination’, also staged, also fake, nobody died or got hurt. The media told you otherwise and that’s the only reason you think so.
If you still haven’t realised yet, the common thread is that it’s all a joke. The people running the show enjoy a good laugh too.
21733692? ago
Are you claiming that the tower were empty (save for dipshits running in to them after the attack)?
Or that literally 0 people died as a (direct) consequence of the events of 9/11?
I've pondered this. Got any reading material?
21733808? ago
The VicSim report, a spin-off of September Clues (also well worth watching)
Yep, empty. Perhaps never fully populated at any point after construction. There were probably a few floors operational to keep up appearances, plus the lobby and the restaurant at the top — I visited that myself, I know it was real.
Apart from that, just empty and unfinished floors with lighting to give the impression of a functioning office building. This is why there is no office furniture visible in any debris photos. The towers were purpose-built to be brought down on that day, which had great occult significance.
By the time they fell they were fully evacuated and empty, as was most of downtown Manhattan, and demolished in a conventional manner, shrouded in military smokescreens and electronic jamming equipment to prevent anyone recording what was actually happening.
Meanwhile the media played prerecorded CGI footage of airplanes hitting the towers and CGI demolition footage of them collapsing in spectacular style. Nothing on the TV that day actually happened, all footage showing airplanes hitting towers and towers crashing down is fake and prefabricated.
The documentary September Clues unravels it completely.
The same folks responsible for September Clues also put together a compelling analysis of the ‘victims’ of 9/11, which they call the VicSim Report. In short, they prove conclusively that the photos of the alleged victims are photoshopped fakes, and follow ups to locate these people reveals no evidence that anyone died. FOIA requests lead to no official death records, or in several cases evidence that they were already dead.
It was a con job, a magic trick. The elites responsible pulled off a truly impressive bit of media fakery, but on closer inspection it’s pretty rough around the edges and easy to see how they did it.
21729609? ago
Q always says we have more than we know. I think movies are a major part of that. I posted a quick primer a few days ago on how to decode them using Ad Astra but it didn't do very well.
21729942? ago
I believe you are correct. The hard part is its virtually impossible to pick out the truth from all the Hollywood hocus pocus. Occasionally we'll get a crumb, like the movie 'Contact' and the looking glass project, but even then what part is real and what part is fake?
21731318? ago
Check out Nicholson1968. He did more to help me interpret movies than anything else.
21736103? ago
thanks, will look it up.
21728435? ago
Silence is consent.
21727219? ago
I've heard it explained in this way.
What (((They))) believe is that the
goal for all of us is 'ascension' (think heaven).
There are 2 ways to achieve this. The first, and most common way is to truly be 51% good. 'good/evil' is based off of a service to others, or service to self mentality. We all get to choose as individuals.
'Good' would be 51% good as a soul. You would follow the idea that 'Service to others, is service to self'.
'Evil" follows the idea that 'Service to self, is service to others'.
Both ways of living can result in personal ascension, but only one path is considered our creators path, where as the other is the path of Satan.
Basically you can be good at being selfish and worrying about what's best for you. Focusing on what will benifit the well-being of yourself above all else.
Conversely you can trust in the Creator, and life in general and always do what is best for huminty, which in turn will be best for you.
(((They))) believe to achieve their goal of ascension they must be 99% evil. The line "It doesn't matter if you believe this to be true because (((They))) do to their very core". Is often used in some variation.
If you fall somewhere in between good and evil you get to reincarnate here and try again. This happens as many times as it's needed for you to ascend into a higher evolved, and more advanced form of consciousness.
21732940? ago
Im going to have to correct you on a couple things. 1 there are no amount of works or services to others that you can do to get you into heaven and 2. There is no reincarnation. You get one life one earth and when you die you either go to heaven if you believe in and give your life to Jesus whom bore all of our sins so that we may be righteous in his Father's sight or you dont and you go to hell. No reincarnation no purgatory.
21736576? ago
I have witnessed proof of reincarnation many times. It's real.
21739957? ago
Really. So what proof can you share. I mean if your reincarnated you dont come back as the very same person. So how have you witnessed it
21735603? ago
Did you know Jesus spoke of, and was a teacher of reincarnation? Jesus was an example for all of us so that we could witness, in the flesh, our full potential as humans. He does not want us to worship him. Any of the words you get about Jesus are another man's perspective on his deeds and acts. Jesus himself was humble and simply here to show us how service to others over service to self is the path to salvation. Christ conscious...
21740020? ago
Well i asked for Scripture to prove this. But i doubt anyone can show that proof because it is not in the Bible. So prove me wrong and give me Scripture where Jesus taught or even said it. And you cant use his resurrection as proof of reincarnation. That is totally different. Come on some one give some evidence
1 million dollars to the one that can prove Jesus taught reincarnation
21740162? ago
You are right, it is not in the Bible, it's in one of the books the Church took out because it didn't go along with their narrative of control. I will find a reference as to where this info is located and share it. Stay tuned!
21744253? ago
Interesting read i will say. But thats not fully convincing that there is reincarnation. Ill put it this way if we are all reincarnated and we are born over and over. The same soul but not the same person as this article states why was there even a need for Jesus to come and take our sins away? I mean we are going to be born again so there is no need for us to be saved from our sins right? And it mentions Elijah. Well Elijah never died he was takin up into heaven without dying. Again interesting read but doesn't prove reincarnation is real. Sorry
21754214? ago
Jesus did not come to take your sin's away. You are not born with sin. You are born as pure and loving as possible. You only take on what other people put on you, or what you think others expect from you As you go through life trapped trying to live up to someone else's exspectations.
God loves you unconditionally, and does not judge. Sin is a human construct used as a way to control us all. Jesus was only here too show us the power of love over fear, and how awesome we can all be. You do not have to do anything to find salvation, except unlock what is already within your self by understanding You. Your real self, not feeding your ego. God doesn't work on the same level as our petty little egos and is of pure Love.
21762567? ago
You should probably read the Bible sir. God made Adam and Eve without sin. Yet they listened to the devil and corrupted themselves which brought on death. So every offspring from then on was born with the sin nature. This is the very reason Jesus came. To take our sin away. That is why he went to the cross. There was no reason for him to become human otherwise
21734770? ago
There is good evidence Jesus Christ believed in reincarnation.
21735248? ago
Is that right. Ok soo what actual scripture do you have for me that proves this.
21743669? ago
There’s a ton. Then you look into the differences between Pharisees and Saduccees, how the big argument was regarding reincarnation.
There’s a ton. There’s more proof that Jesus taught reincarnation than there is for the existence of hell
21744003? ago
Sorry but that Scripture you gave has nothing to do with reincarnation. I know you highlighted risen again. But thats not even close to eluding to Jesus teaching reincarnation. "Some say the prophet of old has risen again" here is a little known fact. Jesus was always the Father's son. Even at the foundation of the earth. Do you remember the story in the old Testament about the 3 that were put in the fiery furnace. They didnt burn and when they looked inside the furnace they saw 4 not three men. The 4th one was Jesus. And this was before he was actually born into this world. So no that doesn't mean reincarnation. Try again.
21745187? ago
You aren’t an educated Christian—and this isn’t an attack. When faced with biblical reincarnation Christians are ignorant because they don’t study the Bible.
Jesus Christ himself said that John the Baptist was Elijah reincarnated in Matthew 11:7-14.
Again, loads more info on reincarnation than there is for the existence of Hell.
21749173? ago
7 And as they departed, Jesus began to say unto the multitudes concerning John, What went ye out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken with the wind?
8 But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft raiment? behold, they that wear soft clothing are in kings' houses.
9 But what went ye out for to see? A prophet? yea, I say unto you, and more than a prophet.
10 For this is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee.
11 Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
14 And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come
Ok so verse 14 does is not literally interpreted to meant that John is elias reincarnated. You are interpreting wrong. He is saying he is like elias
Niv version 14 And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come. Notice the word "the" before elias. He was not elias reincarnated but a prophet likened to elias.
No i am not ignorant of what the Bible says
21749790? ago
Ha, ok I get it. It’s hard to get through your cognitive dissonance so let’s try again with Matthew 17 and try to explain away the prophecy of Malachi that explicitly says Elijah will be reincarnated before Jesus comes back.
10 And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?
11 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
12 But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.
13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
21759856? ago
Again that Scripture says nothing or implies nothing about reincarnation.
Also Elijah was takin into heaven while he was still alive. You cant reincarnate a man that never died.
But again ill say 2 things. If reincarnation is real then there was no reason for Jesus to come and suffer to take our sins on himself. No reason for him to go to the cross and die and be Resurrected 3 days later. If we are all reincarnated and we have have to go through this life multiple times turn to Jesus be saved multiple times there is no reason for Jesus to be around there's no reason for the resurrection there's no reason for it at all because we just go through life over and over and over again. See the dilemma and the reincarnation Theory. It makes zero sense. But I will go a step further in Revelation when Jesus comes back out of heaven with the armies of heavenly host angels it says that's when the Rapture happens the first the dead in Christ will rise up out of their graves and they will have bodies again made incorruptible and then those living believing in Christ their bodies will be turned incorruptible so you telling me how if you die and your reincarnated how and why would bodies dead Souls come out of Graves and become alive again if we are reincarnated it's because we are not reincarnated now I've just proven more times that The Reincarnation theory is a lie
22010732? ago
Perhaps you are missing something extra special about Jesus. Reincarnation is not simply a shot in the dark. You have chosen you path ahead of time. The goal is to literally evolve a step closer to the creator. You are given free will as a way to allow for grow, or regress.
Is it possible that Jesus was so special, and so in tune with the creator that his path was to complete his cycle here on Earth in one try? This would lead to him evolving as a soul and unlocking the potential we all carry inside on his first try. Perhaps he was here to PROVE to us that reincarnation, however real or not, is not needed. We do not need to figure it over 50 lifetimes, but only 1.
Very few people have glimpsed into the power Jesus opened up within himself. His complete understanding of the path the creator has made available to all of us, is avaible right now. All it takes is a unbreakable relationship with God, your fellow man, unconditional love for all, and putting service to others above the petty personal needs most people seek to this very day.
Jesus was sent here as a template, but it seems many view him as an excuse to take a little less personal responsibility for thier own growth, likely seeing his vast understanding and application of Love and forgiveness to all, as an unattainable feat for a regular mortal human. This is short sighted. Everyone of us is capable of an enormous amount of godly, unconditional, manifesting ability to walk his very path of practicing the word of Love, and the action of forgiveness of all. True forgiveness, especially that of ourselves.
You have to take into account other cultures as well, and ascension beliefs/practices that are recorded and witness countless times throughout the history of all people. You cannot simply close off reincarnation to the teachings of what you believe is the full unadulterated truth of the Bible.
Have you researched the rainbow body phenom that takes place in budism? Even in Christianity they speak of a harvest to come where those who have fully embraced and practice the very actions and have tapped into the same powers within us all that guidef Jesus.
More about Jesus and your claim that it doesn't make sense to attach reincarnation to him. What if I were to say you are right, but not because reincarnation is a lie. Perhaps he completed his full cycle and achieved ascension in just one lifetime?
You may be taking some words from the Bible a little too literally. The souls of men do not rest here on Earth when you complete your journey, only flesh and bone stay Souls are freed upon death, but can also be freed while you are living.
To wrap this up, perhaps you are not giving yourself enough credit and putting too much stock in another man's actions, instead of believing in yourself fully. Maybe you too can do the very same things that Jesus himself showed us long ago that we can all.do this very moment!
Tear down the walls of deception You have built up inside of you, and free your soul from the attachments that are reliant on another man's storey to be interpreted a specific way.that can easily lead to magnificent misunderstandings! Trust in thyself.
21760242? ago
That scripture SPECIFICALLY says that Jesus confirmed John was Elijah reincarnated/reborn
Malachi SPECIFICALLY says that in order for Jesus to come FIRST Elijah must come and set the stage.
Basically, if you don't believe in the malachi professy and you don't believe that John the Baptist was Elijah, you don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.
It's not complicated.
Now i'm not a big fan of churches and even the most cucked pastors admit that John the Baptist was Elijah 'reborn' they don't use 'reincarnation' and they don't talk about it afterwards, however, it's clear that reborn is the same thing as reincarnation
21766120? ago
Lets look at Malachi
Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:
Malachi:4:5
Notice " the coming of the great and Dreadful day of the Lord" this is not speaking about Jesus being born this is speaking about Jesus Second Coming as a conquering King and Elijah must come before. Specifically Elijah is supposed to be one of the two witnesses or the spirit of Elijah will be like one of the two witnesses that Revelation speaks of. It has nothing to do with reincarnation this piece of scripture that I just explain to you refute your reincarnation Theory.
Let's go back and look at Matthew because I have to correct you on something.
And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.
Matthew:11:14
Notice in Matthew Jesus is talking about Elias not Elijah. Those were two different men in the Bible. Remember again Elijah never died he was taken up into heaven and he had passed shall we say like the Baton on to Elias. Can you speak about Elijah and Matthew there is no Elijah it's Elias again two different men. Again neither scripture is talking anything about reincarnation and you have said there are plenty of other places that mentions reincarnation so but those other scriptures out there that you say talk about reincarnation and I will explain to you what they really mean
21766316? ago
Wow.
Elias is the latinized word for Elijah. The KJV says Elias the cucked NIV says Elijah. It’s clear you aren’t a Christian.
You clearly just lost this debate with your lack of biblical knowledge in even comprehending Elias is Elijah.
21774130? ago
I stand corrected i was thinking of Elisha. But it still doesn't change the fact that Malachi talks about Jesus second coming as a king. Funny how you only address the name of Elijah and not try and pick apart the rest of my comment. And then attack me by saying " im not a Christian" and saying haha i won the debate because you got a name wrong. Clearly you know im right and the only thing you had to come back with was the name of Elijah.
21775143? ago
Because the rest of your comments don't matter. You don't confuse Elisha with Elias if you know the bible. You don't know it, so anything you say is Grade A Retarded.
21775755? ago
Oh but they do matter. They matter more than me getting a name mistaken for another name. And just because i had a brain fart about a name does not mean i don't know the Bible. You sir dont have a leg to stand on with your theory because if you did you would address the rest of my comments. But because i proved my point and you have zero rebuttal. You do what liberals do when faced with the truth and facts. You attack and say your stupid and retarded.
21775901? ago
You lost the debate long ago man. Why not go ask your pastor if he believes that John the Baptist was Elijah and then come back to me
21777108? ago
Nope i didn't lose. And your back to the same thing. Lol
21783075? ago
Mate. Ask your pastor and don’t bias your question, just be honest use the Matthew quote and ask if he thinks John the Baptist is Elijah and if not, why not
21786374? ago
Mate John the Baptist is not literally Elijah reincarnated. He may have had the spirit of Elijah but he was not Elijah.
Elijah never died. He was taken straight into heaven. Also when Jesus was getting ready to ascend into heaven after walking the earth for 40 days after his Resurrection the disciple saw moses and Elijah together. So if john was Elijah reborn then he could not turn back into Elijah. Also Elijah is supposed to be 1 of the 2 witnesses that come back during the tribulation period. As per reincarnation you cant 1 be reincarnated if you never died 2 be reincarnated as a different person and then return after that back into your original person. So Elijah goes to heaven without dying then gets reincarnated as John the Baptist then is again seen as Elijah during Jesus Ascension into heaven and then come back as Elijah as one of the two witnesses.
And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,
Matthew:17:1And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
Matthew:17:2And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
Matthew:17:3
21786467? ago
The spirit of elijah, is reincarnation. You can't remember your previous life but have the spirit of your previous self.
Yes he could. He was born on earth once, didn't die, and came back. Though yes you make a good point. Though ARGUABLY. Jesus dying and rising again IS reincarnation. By defintion.
John the Baptist/Elijah was killed at this point so reincarnation coming back, doesn't break the theory.
At minimum do you believe in Ghosts?
21762657? ago
Ok so lets say in theory that john the Baptist was Elijah reborn. Let just say that. That would be one isolated incident of reincarnation. The only time it happened. Which still means it doesn't happen to all of us. And there is no reason to teach reincarnation if it was but for i specific incident. Again if it happens to all of us then there was no reason for Jesus to come and die on the cross. No reason for the Bible. No reason for any of it.
So reincarnation does not happen to all of us
21756644? ago
@Hello7 since you are a based christian I want your opinion and perhaps debate with op and me/native as well. Am I wrong? start with [–] 21734770? thats me
21766814? ago
I'm not an authority; that would be the Word of God, and Jesus Christ is the Way, the Truth, and the Life. It is rather hard for me to tell who is who based on the anonymous tags, and I'm even thinking there are more than two people in this chain? But, regardless, the Bible does not teach reincarnation. The "spirit" (think in this case: role) of Elijah was upon John the Baptist.
God sent His only Son into this world, that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
He was sent to be God's mercy in the flesh. He completely fulfilled the Father's will (which is MERCY) throughout His life and ministry, culminating in the ultimate act of mercy which was taking the sins of mankind upon Himself and dying to take our place. Mankind is utterly depraved and fallen, and this world is passing away.
21730054? ago
can you define and give example of the difference between 'Service to others, is service to self' vs 'Service to self, is service to others'
21730949? ago
I can try, Law of One and its explanation is a bit tricky at times. I think the best way for us to understand it is from practice and experience, and getting a feel for these things as individuals.
The way I see it is as follows. When you do anything for someone, do you expect something back in return? Do you keep track of all the nice things you have done for people? Compare what you are doing to others, and judge other people in what they are, or are not doing? Do you have expectations attached to the outcome of any good deed you complete? If the answer is yes, you are choosing "Service to self, is service to others". If the answer is no, you have chosen "Service to others, is service to self".
There is a simple way to know which one you are orientated towards. Do a bunch of really nice things for someone in your life, especially someone you see as selfish, or self centered. After you complete each task or deed, do not say anything or expect anything in return. If they ask, or tell you they will return the favor, tell them that you will let them know if you genuinely need their help, but it is not necessary for them to do anything in return. When the day comes where you need assistance, and you turn to that person, and they say, "sorry, but no they can't", really pay attention to what emotions you experience. If you are genuinely indifferent, and your disposition doesn't change for the worst, and you are happy to continue helping them in the future, you are aligned towards "service to others, is service to self". If you get irritated or feel resentment because "you have done so many nice things for them", you are likely aligned towards "service to self, is service to others." I think a big part of it is whether the ego is involved with your acts of kindness or not. If it is you are likely service to self, if it is not you are likely service to others orientated.
This is my interpretation of this, I could be misunderstanding it, but that is the best I can explain it.
21742342? ago
Very good info.
From all my readings, they always say do something to help others, and you'll get paid back.
Example, if you want money, give money away. Example: You want to feed 100,000 people, you'll find a way to earn money to feed them.
Its just 1 example of the many.
Back in the days, I used to help others a lot. These days, I just focus on myself more, and if anybody comes to me, I'll help them. Why? Because when I offer to help people, they are not requesting it, so I found out I they dont want help. Sometimes, even when people ask for help, they dont really want help, they just want to talk to someone.
Very fascinating.
21729526? ago
Not correct, both the positive and negative path are considered valid paths.
From 7.17
21730762? ago
I re-read this, and it is still not completely clear to me the difference. The way I interpret is that under circumstances where the individual is of good heart and genuinely trying to do good, just put themselves before others, can still ascend in a positive light. However, I don't believe that this is the intention of (((Them). It seems that they have manipulated this point to serve themselves maliciously.
I understand that good/bad are not real outcomes and simply a matter of perspective, but it seems that (((They))) have taken this point and used it in their favor. Convincing themselves that what is being done is in service of some higher power that most people may not agree with.
Law of One is a bit confusing at times, so feel free to let me know if I'm completely missing the point.
21730867? ago
This is all discussed in "Dialogue with "Hidden Hand", Self-Proclaimed Illuminati Insider"
(((They))) absolutely know that they are on the negative path, and are consciously working to corrupt the world, to polarize it negatively, and to achieve a negative harvest. They want to make as many people on Earth polarize to 95% service to self so that they can achieve a negative harvest to work in 4th density negative. It's like they are recruiting more people to their side.
I believe that the people at the very top of the power structure were basically working with Lucifer to provide negative catalyst to Earth to give us choice between the positive and negative path. Without the darkness, we wouldn't understand the light and there wouldn't be a clear choice. Hence what Lucifer was hired to do for Earth.
I wouldn't consider people like Hillary Clinton to be very much in tune with this... Although it could be a "loving" action to provide negative catalyst, most of these occultists are just monsters who enjoy the darkness. But I suppose they are allowed to enjoy the darkness.
Lucifer is also no longer present on Earth because his job was completed.
And it doesn't really matter any more, because it's become clear that the masses are starting to turn against the Cabal. In this time of the great awakening people are very quickly turning against the darkness of the Cabal when they see the truth.
21727834? ago
This is what's stated in the Law of One series, and the figure there is 95% for service to self ascension. Interesting to see this referenced here!
21728458? ago
You are correct, it is 95%, not 99% evil. 99% would be pretty tough to meet for a politician or public figure, wouldn't it?
As I've come to understand it the Law of One is directly connected to the basis of what (((They))) believe.
As I understand It the Law of One was taught to some of the earliest rulers in the Egyptian empire. It was not received as the source of the information had hoped, in the sense that the 'service to self' approach caught on for the royalty instead of 'service to others', as the source of the information had hoped.
That was the start of thousands of years of secret, and ill intentioned elites practicing thier religion in the shadows. When confronted, it was written off as a lie or conspiracy.
21726273? ago
*[they]
Don't use [their] memes. It's exactly what [they] want us to do. There is a reason Q never uses it...and instead sticks to killboxes. Lurk more, you're glowing.
21726444? ago
Whatever dude, I can leave the commas off, doesn't make a shit, everyone knows what we're talking about. Parenthesis is not a meme, its a marker. What you're doing is shifting the subject, not relevant to the point. The only one glowing is you.
21727461? ago
So many old goats doing all they can to push their hatred of an entire group based on the actions of individuals.
21729967? ago
There is a reason Trump is passing laws to protect Jews. Its because their involvement will be so big that he has to protect the innocent Jews. Nobody is saying its all of them, but we know who owns the banks, hollywood, media, etc. It ain't blacks or whites.
21730009? ago
MANY here have specifically said it is ALL of them. That is who I have been arguing against since we've been here.
21730406? ago
There is a reason Trump is passing legislation to protect Jews. When the truth comes out, there will be so many of them guilty that it will cause a tidal wave of backlash against the Jewish community. Obviously all are not guilty of crimes, but most are guilty of attacking the Christian community in ways that simply piss people off and cause the desire for retribution. They have fought to remove 10 commandments from public display, same with Christmas displays and all things Christian, etc. As we say down South, "Them are fightin' words".
21727448? ago
Which is why our enemies embrace the use of it on social media....smart. Do whatever you want...but it's clear you haven't read the Q posts...
Q has specifically said our enemies want to divide us by race, gender and religion. What are you doing here again?
21730007? ago
I've read every post. When I use (((them))), I'm talking about the guilty, nobody else.
21730038? ago
It doesn't matter what you want it to mean...it's meaning sits outside of your thoughts and beliefs.
21730275? ago
You have a serious God complex dude.
21730333? ago
Lol. Project much?
21730425? ago
Nope, I'm not the one talking down to people.
21730704? ago
🤔
21729750? ago
So do I. Lol I can’t stand the idiots on the Left. Make up with them when all’s said and done. NO WAY!
21729872? ago
Pawn
21725216? ago
Correct. They see it as our problem if we do not understand the message. Even as evil as they are, they still have to deal with their own conscience. Deep down they all know they want to come back to the light.
21730484? ago
Jews do not have a consience. This shit is retarded.
21730413? ago
Its how they get off feeling right and virtuous. They warn their enemy of attacks but also deceive them which they are allowed to do.
21730398? ago
Sounds like Roman Catholicism. Some twisted version of a confession booth.
21727686? ago
This is fascinating and yet we all continue to partake in a system of debt based slavery and cheap product consumerism.
21725590? ago
I doubt they have a conscience. They have 'natural law' according to a famous Rofschild.
21739632? ago
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-23431793
They do. They've just turned it off by selling it to the devil. They know it's wrong, they've just suppressed it for whatever materialist reason.
21727152? ago
That post “axe me a question” ? Anyone ever prove if it was a real Rothschild
21730770? ago
Can you provide the post you're talking about?
21727283? ago
If fake, the poster was so insightful as to still be useful.
21725310? ago
And by us not acting, we believe we are passively giving ((them)) permission.
21728074? ago
The fact that they show us what they are going to do is to obtain our permission through deceit and symbolism. They don't just show us their plans to be pompous, they must do this to bend the universal laws of free will. It's a loophole they have understood for centuries.
21730450? ago
Its like vampire law that they have to be invited in.
21725395? ago
Can't just shoot 'em so we have to work within a flawed system.
21724644? ago
wtf
which batman movie and what timestamp
21724682? ago
https://gothamist.com/arts-entertainment/sandy-hook-labeled-strike-zone-in-dark-knight-rises
21726334? ago
Whoa... Good find!
The video linked is gone now but here's an archive link to the rest of that jewel:
http://archive.is/uDCNm
http://archive.is/uDCNm
21724568? ago
Lol nice find
How did mortgages get paid off on Christmas for the families involved ?