Q3165
[They] thought it was coming last Friday.
Ammunition spent.
Q
Once they realized that they had been tricked, they tried to 'get the ammunition back'. That way, they could use it when the Mueller report really came out.
They wasted all of that emotional video material, all of those talking points from that huge manifesto... They could have cherry-picked from that manifesto for weeks, and never hit the same point twice. (Meanwhile burying the Mueller report.)
They didn't hit the manifesto too hard right after the shooting, because they were hoping to 'recover their ammunition'. But they can't use it now. You can't suddenly start talking about the manifesto more than a week after the shooting. For the ruse to work, the 'outrage' must be immediate.
The sheep have been programmed that way.
Q is brilliant.
view the rest of the comments →
17614706? ago
https://www.bestgore.com/murder/livestream-video-deadly-shooting-attack-mosque-christchurch-new-zealand/
Anyone that believes this video is fake watch from 10:40 onward. Youll see all of the things people are saying dont happen 1 shell casings on the floor 2 blood on floor 3 blood on people 4 bullet impacts 5 brain matter exploding from heads
Watch it and tell me how you dont see any of that
17615327? ago
I haven't watched and am not interested in watching the video of this event. From what I have read, there do seem to be some strange happenings surrounding it, so I think it would be safe to conclude that this is not a case of one crazy guy independently seeking to create mayhem.
But for all of the claims that this and other mass shootings were staged events, I just cannot believe that this is how business is done. If the attack was staged but people believe it was real or if the attack was actually real - the end result is the same: the massacre is used to further someone's agenda.
So which is easier to pull off? Getting actors to stage an attack (who just might spill the beans afterwards) or blowing 50 innocent people away? If killing innocent people is not an issue for you (and I don't believe it is an issue for the DS), then killing the people just seems like a much tidier way to go with.
No need to gain access to the mosque, No need to keep away people who are not in on the ruse don't accidentally wander onto the set. No need to worry about someone blabbing after the fact. Just activate your asset, let him mow down the innocents, and then spin the story to further your desired outcome.
Until someone can explain to me why staging a mass killing event is more efficient than actually committing a mass killing event, I can't buy the staged event claims.
17618000? ago
Maybe you're right. It would be a flase flag anyway. Both types of "attacks" occure. But it's easier to recruit people for a staged event (who think it's for a "good" purpose) than to find someone who really kills a lot of people and wants to get caught afterwards to get a real life sentence.
17620426? ago
From many descriptions, the people with the guns seem to be under some type of control - perhaps MK Ultra.
They don't seem to be ordinary people but rather are being controlled.
Earlier I read the work of one anon who described people dressed in red or red cars that seemed to be some kind of marker/signal for the attacker. While this anon promoted the 'staged' theory, it is equally possible that the red people/objects were part of the attacker's programing. In other words, red was used as a signal as the anon suggests but it was a signal given to someone under some type of mental control and the attack was actually a real event.