Posts like these are intended to hijack the movement to make us seem like white supremacists. People in The_Donald fell for a similar post, an Asian guy telling 'us' white people that he's proud of his race and we should be too. 5k+ upvotes.
Problem? Pride in skin color is no different than hatred toward skin color.
I know this is voat and n'er this, n'er that but this is the truth.
If you have racial pride, you're racist.
That all said, yes I'm a Q follower, white, male, married, and aware Jews rule the world.
Stay on track, do not fall into the trap of an imbecile.
Pride in skin color is no different than hatred toward skin color.
It's absolutely different. You can like who you are and your racial heritage without hating other people.
If you have racial pride, you're racist.
No, if you judge people based on the color of their skin and not their individual characteristics, you're a racist. Being proud of your heritage does not make you a racist. How in the world do you come to these conclusions?
Being proud of your heritage doesn't mean you think you're better than other races, it just means you are proud of your heritage.
I'm not sure if I didn't read fully or if you edited when I responded with strawman but... to properly respond:
You can like who you are and your racial heritage without hating other people.
This is where this goes into semantics. "who you are" is something I'd challenge. You'd probably say that our ancestors did x,y,z and we should be proud of it and we are who we are because of them. This is horrible logic. This is the same mentality that enslaves us to white guilt. We cannot have it both ways. You are NOT who you are because of your ancestors, you were born because of your ancestors and certain DNA has you behave and look certain ways but YOUR PERSON IS NOT DEFINED by ancestors. You MAKE CHOICES to DEFINE yourself.
Enough with the collectivism please, it's so toxic.
You are splitting hairs. You are deconstructing posts, making your own conclusions then arguing against a literal strawman after accusing others of doing the same.
. You'd probably say that our ancestors did x,y,z and we should be proud of it
This is an actual strawman. You inferred a conclusion that wasn't presented and then argued against it.
I don't know if I've ever seen someone so obviously oblivious to their own hypocrisy.. This proof you are literally retarded. Seriously, get the fuck out of this discussion. You aren't even capable of contributing
Strawmanning wouldn't suggest with the "probably," it would dictate an argument.
I intentionally put that forward to speed up the process of you defining what you meant by "who you are" -- if I'm wrong on this please correct me. You seem to be defined by your ancestors.
Strawman: an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.
I did not intend to misrepresent your argument. I even asked you to please correct me. I see you folded then doubled down on it. Sorry to see you go so soon, I was looking forward to learning how you feel you are defined. It seems you had enough of the cognitive dissonance hitting your poor lil brain so you couldn't effectively proceed in the intellectual discussion. Travel with hard hats, friend.
You did engage in strawman and you are unwilling to acknowledge it which means you are pridefully disingenuous, facetiously proceeding as if you founded a discussion on a legitimate premise and therefore aren't worth talking to. You are a charlatan and a hack, and not worth wasting time in discussion with because you will only do the same thing again. I have no interest in a discussion with someone who is willfully disingenuous.
view the rest of the comments →
16637745? ago
Posts like these are intended to hijack the movement to make us seem like white supremacists. People in The_Donald fell for a similar post, an Asian guy telling 'us' white people that he's proud of his race and we should be too. 5k+ upvotes.
Problem? Pride in skin color is no different than hatred toward skin color.
I know this is voat and n'er this, n'er that but this is the truth.
If you have racial pride, you're racist.
That all said, yes I'm a Q follower, white, male, married, and aware Jews rule the world.
Stay on track, do not fall into the trap of an imbecile.
16638046? ago
It's absolutely different. You can like who you are and your racial heritage without hating other people.
No, if you judge people based on the color of their skin and not their individual characteristics, you're a racist. Being proud of your heritage does not make you a racist. How in the world do you come to these conclusions?
Being proud of your heritage doesn't mean you think you're better than other races, it just means you are proud of your heritage.
16638238? ago
See other post as you left out context and strawmanned me too.
P.S. I see your response loves referencing heritage which I never once mentioned.
16638379? ago
I don't think you quite understand what that means...
16638866? ago
I'm not sure if I didn't read fully or if you edited when I responded with strawman but... to properly respond:
This is where this goes into semantics. "who you are" is something I'd challenge. You'd probably say that our ancestors did x,y,z and we should be proud of it and we are who we are because of them. This is horrible logic. This is the same mentality that enslaves us to white guilt. We cannot have it both ways. You are NOT who you are because of your ancestors, you were born because of your ancestors and certain DNA has you behave and look certain ways but YOUR PERSON IS NOT DEFINED by ancestors. You MAKE CHOICES to DEFINE yourself.
Enough with the collectivism please, it's so toxic.
16639038? ago
You are splitting hairs. You are deconstructing posts, making your own conclusions then arguing against a literal strawman after accusing others of doing the same.
This is an actual strawman. You inferred a conclusion that wasn't presented and then argued against it.
I don't know if I've ever seen someone so obviously oblivious to their own hypocrisy.. This proof you are literally retarded. Seriously, get the fuck out of this discussion. You aren't even capable of contributing
16639337? ago
Strawmanning wouldn't suggest with the "probably," it would dictate an argument.
I intentionally put that forward to speed up the process of you defining what you meant by "who you are" -- if I'm wrong on this please correct me. You seem to be defined by your ancestors.
16639441? ago
That's called strawman you dumb fuck
16640465? ago
I did not intend to misrepresent your argument. I even asked you to please correct me. I see you folded then doubled down on it. Sorry to see you go so soon, I was looking forward to learning how you feel you are defined. It seems you had enough of the cognitive dissonance hitting your poor lil brain so you couldn't effectively proceed in the intellectual discussion. Travel with hard hats, friend.
16640647? ago
You did engage in strawman and you are unwilling to acknowledge it which means you are pridefully disingenuous, facetiously proceeding as if you founded a discussion on a legitimate premise and therefore aren't worth talking to. You are a charlatan and a hack, and not worth wasting time in discussion with because you will only do the same thing again. I have no interest in a discussion with someone who is willfully disingenuous.
16640782? ago
I get it, you folded. Hard hat begone.
16641197? ago
No, I called you out for not arguing in good faith. I'm not wasting time explaining myself to someone who is not going to discuss in good faith.
16642745? ago
hard hat begone