15990780? ago

Of course it is. And it's the most successful in military history. Shills are stupid.

15986872? ago

Get his sons too. He about destroyed Las Vegas setting it up to be a sanctuary city. It was better with the Mafia running things.

15979922? ago

Yeah, haven't seen shit about "Made in China" Harry in awhile. He was one of the first motherfuckers to dip out when Hussein left office. On the real side of it though..I don't believe Q's into this for the memes...he wants to preserve the idea and feeling of Patriotism...those that serve in office need to keep respect and frankly alot of people, if they know outright all of the dirt that was done by those like Reid, while in office, they won't believe in that same office when a real Patriot actually gets in there and does great things.

15979265? ago

OP started off as plausible, then descended into extreme guess work.

15978709? ago

"income taxes will be abolished and replaced with a sales tax on non-essential items"

Let this be SO! I have long held that a national consumption tax is the most fair for all. If you can afford those 6 mansions, 12 jets, etc etc - then pay the tax on it all. Let the rest of us pay on what 'luxuries' we have and be done with it.

15977831? ago

This totally sucks how all the deep state/cabal scumbags who are 'dying of natural causes' are all in their 80s and 90s and it's WAAAAAAAAY too plausible that they really did die of illness/old age - not military tribunals. This is NOT justice when they all slink into the abyss without any of their crimes exposed publicly and are given hero send-offs, state funerals, and week-long mourning shit on TV 24x7.

Q repeatedly said "NO DEALS" and that's obviously not true - they're ALL getting deals - even those being executed (if any really are/were) - if the traitor is choosing the terms of their exit and getting to keep their 'honor' and getting fucking hero tributes all over the news and state funerals on the taxpayer dime. This is DISGUSTING! How the hell is the brainwashed public ever going to be red-pilled en masse when all of the traitors are never being outed publicly?

15976802? ago

This is the POS Reid who had BLM invade the Bundy ranch for his Uranium deal. Same POS who had Lavoy Finnicum murdered. Reid= Demon-Scum.

15976156? ago

So now every person on their death bed was executed, c'mon, wake the fuck up!

15978290? ago

Only the Qtards believe that. People possessing actual functioning brains and common sense know better.

15976056? ago

This is a garbage source. Known disinformation agent. Find more credible sources.

15975511? ago

No. I doubt it. Cancer is not a Military Tribunal. And trust me no Military Tribunals are taking place behind the scenes. You people are THICK.

15979872? ago

Well, not according to the tribunal calendar. There are 2 tribunals happening now, but none of them relevant to Reid.

15980236? ago

Or anyone else that are Big Fish.

15980257? ago

Truth.

15975446? ago

How is history going to reflect all of these “executions”? If they’re done in secret it defeats half of the reason for executing people. Yes we need to wipe villainy from the face of America, but we also need them to serve as an example to others who would wish to subject us to tyranny.

15975338? ago

Benjamin Fulford is not a reliable source. Very little of what he says ends up being true.

15975277? ago

Secret =/= Justice

No Name, Bush and now this....this is BS. We are not seeing Justice AT ALL. Anywhere. Guess I’m a shill.

15979856? ago

Bush … no proof other than natural death. Kasich validated no name on Prime Time, Cuomo's show.
Bush was gravely ill. Nothing he said or did would count in any court, or tribunal.

15981665? ago

Assumptions.

15974991? ago

He was recently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer of which you have a ZERO survival rate. You people have to stop discrediting yourselves with this bullshit. You cannot conclude that a person was executed just because they are diagnosed with a cancer that results in a quick death 100% of the time.

15977685? ago

Except RBG had pancreatic cancer 10 years ago and was still alive enough to attend GHWB's funeral on 12-5-18.

15975091? ago

Unless the diagnosis is bullshit

15975119? ago

You are beyond hope. There is no reasoning with a lunatic living in a conspiracy.

15978097? ago

Correction: living in a conspiracy fact.

15976044? ago

Tell it to the Trump-Russia Conspiracy MSM...

15975235? ago

Wait - the MSM says McCain died of natural causes, Q says he was executed.

Neither one provided irrefutable proof.

Yet you believe MSM, and I believe Q. Somehow that makes you reasonable and me a wacko conspiracy theorist beyond any hope of sanity?

15976808? ago

Lol... that's actually an argument, IMO

15975537? ago

Hey, whatever, delusion floats your sinking boat. You have to be sane first, in order to be beyond any hope of sanity.

Please provide your proof that McCain was executed. When you can do that then you will have a valid point, until then, you are nothing but an unhinged conspiracy nut.

15976116? ago

'You have to be sane first, in order to be beyond hope of sanity' - wth does that even mean? You come in here acting all high & mightier than thou...then you drop bs like that - I bet you think your farts smell like lilac too

You will find no quarter here troll

15976159? ago

You come in here acting all high & mightier than thou... I am higher and mightier than you .... - I bet you think your farts smell like lilac too, no, my farts smell like roses.

15986958? ago

"I'm rubber and you're glue..." grade school style "Oh Yeah? My mom's prettier" response. Sheer Brilliance.

15974903? ago

it is surprising to see somebody mention harry reid before Q knowing his days are numbered.

15974738? ago

No one in the Pentagon would be talking about secret tribunals, secret executions, and the rest of it is pretty much unverified rumors.

Sources offered are not convincing.

15973985? ago

I’m from Missouri, the Sho-Me state. I need more convincing on this story.

15973979? ago

You folks are suffering from Anosognosia.

(why would the Deep State use 8chan of all places for information??)', which protects Q's legitimacy from being questioned.

QAnon’s true believers devastated as the conspiracy theory goes down in flames — and now they’re at each other’s throats

For most people truth is what they think it is. It’s easier to lie to someone than to convince someone that they have been lied to. There’s no one bluff than he or she who will not see the truth that is totally present in front of them.

Many people in this reality are still under the spell of what I call the Matrix. What's so ironic is, a falsehood only needs one juncture and a lot more shielding falsehoods to make people believe it. Conditioning is what makes us believe that which you believe is totally palpable.

Tyler the AI is Q.

1-1-19: National Emergency. Fail

Drop #1 “claimed that “HRC extradition [was] already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run” with

Drop #2 alleging “HRC detained, not arrested (yet)” and that there would be “massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US.”

Drop #15 to predict that John Podesta would be indicted on Nov. 3, and Clinton aide Huma Abedin indicted on Nov. 6.

Drop #25 that proof of his predictions would “begin 11.3.” Again, the only significant event of this day was the president leaving for Asia.

Drop #32, Q claimed that the “initial wave [of arrests] will be fast and meaningful,” with many members of the media “jailed as deep cover agents.”

Drop #34 unveiled a host of predictions for what Q claimed would happen imminently. He claimed that “over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country.” He claimed that everything he’d been talking about in secret “will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted,” resulting in “public riots.”

Drop #38 continued with the conspiracy fantasizing, predicting “other state actors attempting to harm us during this transition,” along with “increased military movement,” “[National Guard] deployments starting tomorrow, and “false flags.”

Drop #44 that “before POTUS departs on Friday he will be sending an important message via Twitter,” used Drop #47 to warn his readers to “be vigilant today and expect a major false flag,” and claimed in Drop #55 that President Trump would unleash the massive military purge (now nicknamed “The Storm”) with a tweet reading “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us…….”

Drop #61: that there would be “Twitter and other social media blackouts” that would accompany the massive deep state purge. Drop #65, Q claimed “it has begun,” with Drop #67 predicting that news of John Podesta’s military plane being “forced down” “will be leaked” with a prominent “fake news anchor” being pulled off the air.

Needless to say, none of what Q predicted in his first 60+ posts took place. The National Guard was never called up, mass arrests never took place, Hillary Clinton and John Podesta weren’t detained, Donald Trump never sent a tweet mentioning “The Storm,” and the Emergency Alert System wasn’t activated.

On Dec. 10, Q predicted in Drop #326 that “false flag(s)” would occur, with “POTUS 100% insulated” and to “expect fireworks.”

Drop #647, Q seemed to predict a major event involving the Department of Defense for Feb. 1, calling it the “[D]ay [Of] [D]ays.”

A few days after that fizzled, Q insinuated in Drop #700 that the weekend of Feb. 10 and 1 would be a “suicide weekend” for individuals targeted by the president. There were no high-profile suicides by public figures that weekend.

Drop #796 was a post full of quasi-military chatter that seemed to predict a possible car bombing in London around Feb. 16. No terrorist attack of any type happened in London at all that month.

As talk of President Trump’s military parade ramped up, Q predicted in Drop #856 that “a parade that will never be forgotten” would take place on 11/11/18. That parade has now been postponed until next year due to costs, and likely won’t take place at all.

Then, in Drop #912, Q claimed that the intelligence sharing alliance known as “Five Eyes” “won’t be around much longer.” As of August, it is still in effect.

Drop #997 predicted on April 3 that the Pope would “have a terrible May.” The closest to this that happened was the resignation of several Chilean bishops in June after Pope Francis criticized them over their handling of a sex abuse scandal.

On April 7, Q made a cryptic post in Drop #1067 that read simply “China. Chongqing. Tuesday.” The next Tuesday was April 10, and no newsworthy event took place on that day in that city.

Drop #1302 on April 27, Q claimed a “Mother of All Bombs” related to negotiations with North Korea would be “dropped” in the next week. Never happened again.

Q predicted on March 5 in Drop #854 that “HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5)” [sic] would soon emerge, and that it would be the “nail in many coffins.” She went on a tour with William Clinton.

Q predicted in Drop #1043 that “pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire,” and insinuated in two April drops that photos of Obama with a young girl named “Wendy” would appear and open him up to charges of pedophilia. No such pictures have ever appeared.

Q predicted John McCain’s resignation from the Senate as “imminent” several times, including Drop #1319 and Drop #1850, as well as predicting the “end near” in Drop #1555. Only this week did McCain announce he would stop seeking treatment for cancer.

On April 4, Q claimed in Drop #1014 that Mark Zuckerberg was going to step down as chair of Facebook and flee the United States. The same day Q predicted this, Zuckerberg reiterated that he was NOT going to step down—and he still hasn’t.

Q has also made some fizzled predictions about Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, saying “goodbye” to him in Drops #525 and #598, insinuating that Dorsey would be removed from Twitter in Drop #799, predicting in Drop #1102 that Dorsey was “next”

Q’s use of the phrase “next week” to denote the occurrence of something important started with Drop #243 when Q told his followers “just wait until next week” without making any kind of claim as to what was going to happen. It would be the first of over a dozen times Q would kick the can down the road to “next week.”

In Drop #464: Q vaguely predicted a “BIG NEXT WEEK” on Jan. 5, doubling down in Drop #527, predicting “Next Week – BIGGER,” repeating the claim three drops later.

Drop #1594 became one of Q’s most famous blown predictions, as he claimed that July would be “the month the world discovered the TRUTH.”

After not posting for about three weeks, Q posted in Drop #1687 that “something BIG is about to drop” with links to various press articles about QAnon. He made the exact same claim in Drops #1708, 1748, and 1802.

What’s supposed to happen? Absolutely NOTHING. But as Q would say, enjoy the show.

You folks are totally brainwashed. PERIOD.

Red October - FAIL,

Sessions - FAIL.

Mattis - FAIL.

Kelly - FAIL.

Huber = FAIL.

FISA Doc release - FAIL

Wednesday, December 5, often presented as #D5.- FAIL

You folks are totally suffering from Anosognosia. Big time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlLwtor-R1E

Q - How is everyone going to celebrate the 11-11-2018 Q failed prediction? LOL

(why would the Deep State use 8chan of all places for information??)', which protects Q's legitimacy from being questioned? Ahahaha

QAnon’s true believers devastated as the conspiracy theory goes down in flames — and now they’re at each other’s throats. Oh yeah .. 75K followed on Reddit, now only 15,009 follow on Voat.

He he he

We true Patriots woke up along time ago when Q said a plane hit the Pentagon.

Then you all tried to twist it by saying it was a plane with a missile. Ahahaha Dweebs.

You know what they say .. "A sucker is born everyday."

15980102? ago

This is a sober and pretty accurate assessment.

15976216? ago

You have constructed a well thought out summary in support your contention that those who respect and follow Q are delusional. Was your purpose merely to mock the Q followers, or do you have more meaningful thoughts relative to what you believe the Q phenomenon represents?

15976256? ago

Psy-op.

15976578? ago

For what purpose?

15993750? ago

Purpose? To bypass the MSM and awaken the public to the systemic corruption of the Deep State.

Successful? Absolutely, and on a global scale!

15976139? ago

Lol get a real job

15976307? ago

I am a proprietor of a multi-state home and developing company. Yeah, I make the green bubba.

15976133? ago

Stop the shilliness. Disinformation is necessary. Why put in so much work to try to disprove a military op that's primary purpose is to confuse the deep state? Soros must have implemented a bonus into his benefits/wages package.

15976324? ago

Psy-op. Wake up.

15975106? ago

Oh this fucking guy again...

15975188? ago

I know, I know, reality sucks sometimes. Time to wake up kiddies.

15975118? ago

Truth hurts.

15975280? ago

I don’t mind truth at all.

But I didn’t read your post. I recognized your writing in the first line and added my comment. That’s probably what others are doing too - they see it’s you again and they don’t read it.

So you’re completely wasting your time.

15974414? ago

No flames here, ya pontificating ass.So many blackhats have retired or were fired so far. The whitehats are putting the pieces in place to do even more this year. Playing gotcha with details of Q posts and then screaming "fire" will not break the spirit of patriots. Your post is another one of those we see right through. You are not wanting to help. You are on a negative rant meant to take away hope in the patriot movement. You failed and will continue to do so.

15974905? ago

Keep dreaming and believing in your delusions.

15980305? ago

And what is your grand plan ?

15980444? ago

100 Scriptural Proofs That Jesus Christ Will Save All Mankind.

It is THE WILL of God that all men shall be saved. "Who will have all men to be saved, and come unto the knowledge of the truth." KJV 1Tim. 2:4 By "all men", in this passage, is undoubtedly to be understood all the human race. Salvation comes through the belief of the truth. God wills that all men should come to the knowledge of the truth, and be saved thereby.

God inspires the hearts of the good to pray for the salvation of all men, and say, as Jesus said, "Thy will be done." Matt. 6:10. Adam Clarke says, "Because he wills the salvation of all men, therefore he wills that all men should be prayed for; as in 1 Tim. 2:1. "I exhort, therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men." Would God inspire the hearts of his saints to pray for the salvation of all mankind, if he knew they would not all be saved?

Jesus came to do the will of God. "My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work." John 4:34 "Lo, I come to do they will, O God." Heb. 10:9 The will of God is, that all men be saved. This is his will, by way of distinction and preeminence. Jesus came to do this will. He came as the Savior, as the Savior of all men. He came as the good Shepherd, to seek and save that which was lost. He came to save all men, not only those who lived on the earth while he was here, but all who lived before, and all who have since lived, and all who shall live. Jesus gave himself a ransom for all; he tasted death for every man; and unto him, at last, every knee shall bow, and every tongure shall confess him Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Such is the way in which Jesus does the will of God.

God has no other will besides the will to save all men. "He is in one mind, and who can turn him." Job 23:13.

God loves all mankind. "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son." John 3:16: and, as Jesus died for all men, so God loves all men. This argument adds great force to the last.

God loves even his enemies. For he requires men to love their enemies, which he could not do if he hated his. (Matt. 5:44) And Jesus declared, "for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil." Luke 6:35. This is but an amplification of the preceding argument. If God loves his enemies, he certainly loves all men; for no one doubts that he loves his friends. And can God cause those to be endlessly miserable whom he loves?

The pleasure of God is in favor of the salvation of all men; and therefore, neither death, sin, nor pain, can be the ultimate object of God in reference to man. "As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked." Ezek. 33:11. Death and sin and pain may exist for a time; but if God has no pleasure in them of themselves, they are not the end at which he aims, but the means by which he accomplishes that end. The end in which God rests as his pleasure, design, or purpose, must be essentially benevolent, because he is essentially a benevolent God. Neither death, nor sin, nor pain can be his ultimate plan or pleasure; they are the means by which his holy and righteous designs are carried into effect.

This is the PLAN.

15980605? ago

and you call me delusional. Find yourself a bible talk sub

15980669? ago

Ordinarily people live and learn. You just live.

15973885? ago

Pancreatic Cancer virtually dead already-

Lets see someone who isn't old and terminally ill be taken down, even if its in secret.

15977622? ago

RBG has survived pancreatic cancer for 10 years - since the elites get all the good treatments that the masses have no access to.

15981549? ago

Obviously Harry didn't.

All he received was a black eye.

15973870? ago

while food stamp recipients start hunger riots>

Prolly better stated by saying something about how the fat losers who will riot are suffering from having their supplies of sellable products cut-off, while the truly needy will continue to work with churches and food pantries to eat.

15973738? ago

Good

15973642? ago

If it is done in secret, then it is not justice. Are we going to have to pay for funerals for all of these treasonous people?

15979817? ago

I think no name made a deal, ratted out his comrades, so that he could go out the way wanted. "On his own terms", according to his wife.

15979251? ago

The choice to know will be ours.

The public might not know, but we will know. And we are millions. Millions of worldwide patriots knowing hardly qualifies as 'secret'.

15976477? ago

I completely understand. However, some things cannot be public knowledge, as they would severely damage our relationships with other nations (or cause war!).

15973505? ago

SMOM is losing control over the USA.

15973388? ago

I don't know if this is true about Harry but I hope he dies a slow and burning death. I am from Nevada and today the new Gov. Sissy Lak is being sworn into office. One thing he wants to do is rename the Las Vegas Airport to Harry Reid Airport. Are you kidding me???

15973383? ago

If it happens in secret without the public knowing WHY he was executed then it doesn't count as justice.

15979210? ago

Sorry, but I partially disagree. No Name was executed. I doubt the fact that normies are unaware of the depth of his crimes and treason was much consolation to him as he was being executed.

The public don't know, but we know. There will be many more who face justice out of the limelight. Q has long ago confirmed that only 40% will be made public. If the traitors are executed, then that's justice. The truth may take years or even decades to reach the normies, but at least the traitors will be dead, and unable to cause any more harm to the world.

15979243? ago

The Public thinks John McCain was a war hero and a national treasure. He was given a hero's funeral. That's all the public knows. If that is how our justice system works then it's broken and America is doomed.

15976466? ago

Agreed emphatically.

15975710? ago

It's actually banana republic type shit, if it were true. The good news is it's not true. There will be no military tribunals.

15979220? ago

#HeDidNotDepartOnHisOwnTerms

15991766? ago

So you're saying we're secretly murdering opposition figures? Because that's actually banana republic type shit, if it were true.

15978979? ago

Proof?

15979797? ago

Cuomo Prime Time. Kasich stated McCain was "put to death". Cuomo knew.
Check Prime Time twatter page, or youtube for full interview. It's in the last segment of the interview.

15983591? ago

My request for "proof" was related to the above claim that "there will be no military tribunals" - I knew about the Kasich statement the day it happened.

15992241? ago

Military Tribunals for civilian crimes are illegal. All this hoo-hah about the recent executive-order is bunk. Because there have been no changes to the person subject to the Universal Military Code of Justice. The last change to that was in 2007.

Here's the factsheet put out by the Marines. The key point is the UMCJ is very, very limited with regards to civilains.

MILITARY JURISDICTION

Military Status Is the Key.

Article 2 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, (Section 802 of Title 10, United States Code), UCMJ, lists twelve categories of individuals that are subject to trial by court-martial.

These are mostly service members...and under very limited circumstances, certain specified categories of civilians.

If you go to Section 802 of Title 10, you see this.

"The following persons are subject to this

(1) Members of a regular component of the armed forces, .....

(2) Cadets, aviation cadets, and midshipmen.

(3) Members of a reserve component while on inactive-duty training, but in the case of members of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States only when in Federal service.

(4) Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay.

(5) Retired members of a reserve component who are receiving hospitalization from an armed force.

(6) Members of the Fleet Reserve and Fleet Marine Corps Reserve.

(7) Persons in custody of the armed forces serving a sentence imposed by a court-martial.

(8) Members of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Public Health Service, and other organizations, when assigned to and serving with the armed forces.

(9) Prisoners of war in custody of the armed forces.

(10) In time of declared war or a contingency operation, persons serving with or accompanying an armed force in the field.

(11) Subject to any treaty or agreement to which the United States is or may be a party or to any accepted rule of international law, persons serving with, employed by, or accompanying the armed forces outside the United States and outside the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

(12) Subject to any treaty or agreement to which the United States is or may be a party or to any accepted rule of international law, persons within an area leased by or otherwise reserved or acquired for the use of the United States which is under the control of the Secretary concerned and which is outside the United States and outside the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

(13) Individuals belonging to one of the eight categories enumerated in Article 4 of the Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, done at Geneva August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3316), who violate the law of war."

So 1-9 don't apply to civilians, unless you fit in the categories of #8. 10 only applies to civilians in a very narrow way. This is mainly about civilian contractors for the military. 11 and 12 don't apply in the US and 13 is about enemy combatants found a battlefield.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/802

Basically this wouldn't apply to 99.99% of civilian crimes including things like espionage, treason and terrorism. Even the Rosenbergs who gave nuclear secrets to the Russians were tried in Federal Court in the Southern District of New York where we have also handled Al Qaeda and ISIS subjects. El Chapo one of the most murderous drug dealers in the world in on trial in federal court in Brooklyn right now.

There's absolutely no legal basis "they are going to Guantanamo for miltary tribunals." It's not happening.

16448046? ago

This comment was linked from this v/QRV comment by @16448037.

Posted automatically (#21271) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

16331756? ago

This comment was linked from this v/GreatAwakening comment by @PutinsPenthouse.

Posted automatically (#20386) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

15994690? ago

"Civilians are protected from attack but lose that protection whenever they take a direct part in hostilities for the time of their participation." - https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/law1_final.pdf - "Introduction to the Law of Armed Conflict"

16003105? ago

yup. And that changes absolutely nothing about what I said and I'm not sure why you think it would

The fact remains, the UCMJ does not apply to 99.99% of civilian crimes

16003583? ago

If your point is that "civilians" can not be tried in military tribunals, but "militant combatants" can be, then you are playing a semantic game - We all saw Lindsey Graham ask Kavanaugh about this - We all know what the Courts Martial Executive Order says - I don't understand why you are making your point and you seem to have a rather testy attitude - I smell "shill."

16009898? ago

You can smell all you want, it won't change the facts. The fact is there was no change in who is subject to the Universal Code of Military Justice in that recent executive order, and civilians are only subject to it in extremely limited conditions. It would not apply in over 99.99% of crimes committed by civilians.

If you think I'm playing a semantic game you don't seem to be aware that there's a strict legal definition of what enemy combatant means. You can't simply say someone is that so you can have a military trial. You have to prove that. Yes, Graham asked this of Kavanaugh, but so what? He asked it of Kagan and Sotormayor too. He also wanted the ISIS inspired terrorist who attacked new York to be tried as an enemy combatant. He was not. He was tried in federal court in NYC. Turns out Lindsay Graham doesn't get to decide these things.

If you don't understand the point I am making, it's because the thing you were told a out the executive order was false, but you still wish to believe it's true.

If you feel I have the facts wrong, please point to the part of the executive order that supports your point.

16026013? ago

I appreciate your passion for what you perceive to be truthful - I must say, however, that after researching this subject daily for the past few months I have not found one news analyst, independent or otherwise, who shares your opinion - If you want me to show you on that rat's nest of an Executive Order, you are mistaking me for a lawyer - I am not particularly motivated to try to change your mind, but simply to push back against what I perceive as your inaccurate analysis for the benefit of other readers - Here is the exchange between Kavanaugh and Graham - Instead of you asking me to interpret a highly complicated Executive Order, why don't you tell me the "extremely limited conditions" that you mention could be possible situations in which civilians are tried as "enemy combatants" - What are those limited conditions, and are you suggesting that the "Hamdi" case that was referenced during the exchange meets that criteria? You had a Senator and a Supreme Court Judge agree on it... maybe you know better? Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.

GRAHAM: Let's talk about the law in war. Is there a body of law called the law of armed conflict?

KAVANAUGH: There is -- there is such a body, Senator.

GRAHAM: Is there a body of law that's called the basic criminal law?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.

GRAHAM: Are there differences between those two bodies of law?

KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.

GRAHAM: From an American citizen's point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you? If you're in Paris, does the Fourth Amendment protect you as an American from your own government?

KAVANAUGH: From your own government, yes.

GRAHAM: OK. So if you're in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you against your own government?

KAVANAUGH: If you're an American if Afghanistan, you have constitutional rights against the U.S. government.

GRAHAM: Is there a long-standing...

KAVANAUGH: That's -- that's long-settled law.

GRAHAM: Isn't there also a long-settled law that -- it goes back to Eisentrager case, I can't remember the name of it.

KAVANAUGH: Yes, Johnson vs. Eisentrager.

GRAHAM: Right -- that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy have considered enemy combatants?

KAVANAUGH: They can be.

GRAHAM: Can be.

KAVANAUGH: They can be. They're often -- some -- they're sometimes criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military sense.

GRAHAM: Well let's talk about can be. I think the ...

KAVANAUGH: Under a Supreme Court precedent ...

GRAHAM: Right.

KAVANAUGH: Just want to make -- yeah.

GRAHAM: There's a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military. Is that correct?

KAVANAUGH: That is correct.

GRAHAM: I think a couple of them were executed.

KAVANAUGH: Yeah.

GRAHAM: So if anybody doubts there's a long-standing history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go, but you don't have a constitutional right to turn on your own government and collaborate with the enemy of the nation.

You'll be treated differently. What's the name of the case, if you can recall, that reaffirmed the concept that you could hold one of our own as an enemy combatant if they were engaged in terrorist activities in Afghanistan? Are you familiar with that case?

KAVANAUGH: Yeah, Hamdi.

GRAHAM: OK. So the bottom line is on every American citizen, though you have constitutional rights but you do not have a constitutional right to collaborate with the enemy. There's a body of law well developed long before 9/11 that understood the difference between basic criminal law and the law of armed conflict.

Do you understand those differences?

KAVANAUGH: I do -- I do understand the -- there are different bodies of law, of course, Senator.

So why do you suppose that Lindsey Graham just spontaneously began with this line of questioning? Since you are on this site, I assume you are somewhat informed about news - Have you heard about HRC providing the Chinese government with information about US secret agents in China that were assassinated? She also leaked classified military secrets to China and, what a surprise, their new fighter jet looks like a generic replica of US military - Have you heard about how her State Department (along with McCain) supported Antifa with weapons? Have you heard about HRC authorizing the sale of 20% of our uranium resources to Russia, who is certainly not an ally - This is just a small piece of the tip of the iceburg because there is volumes of information on the traitorous deeds of sellout Americans of all walks including politicians, entertainers, news broadcasters - Of course you can't just "say" someone is an "enemy combatant," but nobody needs to because there is ample evidence - "We" don't make that determination, of course, the courts do - We are speculating here with the best information we have available - So the recent $200 million in new construction at Guantanamo Bay was just for looks? We have just defeated ISIS, according to the President, and we are pulling troops out of Syria... So the renovations were for whom?

You seem like a smart person - A little hot-headed and a few extra doses of attitude, but I think that your assumptions both about "the thing I was told about the executive order was false," as you say... You have no idea who I am and, whoever you are, you are not qualified to make unfounded judgments - As far as "sauce" goes, all I hear from you is a crabby and unfounded opinion about this issue - Perhaps you want to believe a "thing you were told about the executive order was false" - I'm no detective, but by the looks of your grammar I hardly assume that you are a law professor.

16126299? ago

You are wrong.

Graham also asked Kagan and Sotormayor about enemy combatants.

16130189? ago

You provide no supporting evidence... Just opinion... Back it up

16132533? ago

I provided plenty of evidence about who is subject to Military Justice you just need to follow the link.

As for the guys kooky theories on Hillary Clinton they are laughable. Here's how the CIA lost their spy network.

https.www.telegraph.co.uk%2Ftechnology%2F2018%2F11%2F03%2Fdozens-us-spies-killed-iran-china-uncovered-cia-messaging-service%2F&psig=AOvVaw1mRY8wm67K6psAvqQ_DbQu&ust=1547629249154023

China's intelligence agencies are very good. They have been stealing military and aerospace information for as long as I can remember. Their hackers are very good too.

If you want to see how they used to operate read the plea agreement of Su Bin, a Chinese Canadian who stole info on the C17, F22 and F35. There's a link on this page https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/chinese-national-pleads-guilty-conspiring-hack-us-defense-contractors-systems-steal-sensitive

The NSA estimates China had 500 significant hacking intrusions

The NSA estimated in the briefing slide that the Chinese had conducted more than 30,000 cyber attacks as part of the massive defense industrial espionage, and that more than 500 attacks were "significant intrusions in DoD systems."

More than 1,600 network computers were penetrated and at least 600,000 user accounts were compromised, the undated slide stated, noting that the damage from the Chinese cyber spying was assessed to be more than $100 million, mainly in costs for rebuilding networks.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiB_a7Qvu_fAhWjd98KHRmECKkQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffreebeacon.com%2Fnational-security%2Fnsa-details-chinese-cyber-theft-of-f-35-military-secrets%2F&psig=AOvVaw0oask7zfy5zG7KeSjCjA4e&ust=1547631467905643

16130138? ago

Wow, there's no end to the shill-fuck that you are

16130087? ago

"Yeah, it's utter bullshit. If you think the CIA lets the State Department know about its spy network, I don't know what to tell you."

You mean the CIA run by the Muslim communist Brennan who is now under investigation for perjury? I'm pretty sure that "HRC" was pretty chummy with them - Also, hacked into military like the U.S.S. John McCain that was hacked and lost navigation and military planes falling out of the sky - If you take your blinders off and look up from your navel for a moment, you will realize - Just look - And..... you're a shill

16129942? ago

Your voice reminds me of a anti-American Palestinian I had once known...

16129927? ago

blah-blah-blah-blah - Make a concise point and show "sauce" sources - Don't be voluntarily stupid - Graham, now leader of the Senate Judicial Committee, and Kavanaugh, now Supreme Court Justice, both agreed publicly that American citizens that work with American enemies against the government are "enemy combatants" and subject to the "Law of Armed Conflict" - I know you think that are smarter than a US Senator and Supreme Court Justice, but actually you are either an idiot or a shill - Good day.

16132181? ago

You have to be on a battlefield to be a combatant.

15985086? ago

I misunderstood. Sorry.

15977659? ago

Dave Janda?

15973276? ago

Entire report can be listened to here, read by a computer voice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKr-qpsu9wc

15973164? ago

https://archive.ph/gXwb2 :

Terminally Ill Harry Reid Minces No Words About Himself Nor Donald Trump


This has been an automated message.