You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

16445146? ago

It's not overconfidence to say what Q said many times about them panicking.

https://qanon.pub/?q=panic

A LOT of times.

e.g. "PANIC IN DC"

THEY ARE INDEED PANICKING, OP.

Not overconfidence.

If you don't like to read "They are panicking", you don't like reading Q.

Which means....

16446133? ago

Q who? Where's Q ? Haven't heard from him lately. I wonder if he was affected by the "brilliant" failed government shutdown? Just one serious big time arrest please i'm begging you Q ! I'm serious, I truly want my country back! Why is mueller still not in fucking jail? I truly hate these baby killing mother fuckers and I am sick of hearing about them winning!

16447586? ago

Jan 14

EO

Military tribunals became legal.

Coincidence?

16447890? ago

What are you talking about? Military Tribunals existed before January 14th. They are illegal to use for civilian crimes in 99.99% of crimes. Nothing in the EO changed this and the EO went into effect Jan 1.

The EO was a smokescreen to buy Q some time. No part of it changes anything.

16447961? ago

Re_read the crumbs!

You are wrong.

16448037? ago

There's no need to read the crumbs. Trump's executive order was about implementing a law pushed by John McCain and signed by Obama in Dec 2016. The changes contemplated in the law have been in the works since at least 2012.

The Universal Code of Military Justice explains exactly who is subject to that law, nothing changed with this part, the last change was in 2007.

see this anon. https://voat.co/v/QRV/2957477/15992241

16448067? ago

There is a need to read the crumbs because the truth contradicts your false shillbot claims

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2018-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states/

16448112? ago

Every thing I said was true.

Point me to the part of your link that you think contradicts me.

16448136? ago

No, everything you said is FALSE.

Read the EO.

The speed at which you replied is proof you did not read it.

READ IT VERY VERY VERY CAREFULLY

16448487? ago

Point me to where you think it supports what you said.

I don't have to read the EO today. Because I've researched this before. Specifically, the executive order related to sec 5542 of the Military Justice Act of 2016. It's the implementation of the regulations defined below

SEC. 5542. EFFECTIVE DATES. (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this division, the amendments made by this division shall take effect on the date designated by the President, which date shall be not later than the first day of the first calendar month that begins two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS.—The President shall prescribe regulations implementing this division and the amendments made by this division by not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, except as otherwise provided in this division.

http://ogc.osd.mil/mjrg/2017AndrewEffronMilitaryJusticeActOf2016.pdf

16448603? ago

Think of all the phrases relating to "before Jan 2019".

Then think of this NULLIFYING every Obama "pardon" and every FBI/DOJ "nothing to see here" exonerations.

There is a very good reason why this EO is so important.

16451745? ago

I think I'm going to imagine a pony bringing me my favorite flavor of ice cream and a unicorn bringing me my favorite flavor of pudding.