When the Q movement started people were allowed to have differing points of view and it was ok. Unfortunately we all got sent to this website where people are down voted for having a differing points of view, and being down voted insures that people with differing points of view can't submit posts. Really good posts are down voted to the point that know one will see them which is what will happen to this post I'm sure. The posts I see at the top look like we are in an echo chamber. Free speech is dying on here. People get called shills for asking real questions and having posts that maybe don't go along with the collective. The Q movement has a real threat of disappearing if this keeps happening. Unfortunately for typing this i will be called a shill and down voted, but I really don't care. does anyone wonder why we haven't gotten more than 15000 subscribers. when we were at more than 70000 before we got sent here. I am just warning people that we are pushing good people away. WWG1WGA
view the rest of the comments →
15742160? ago
There does seem to be a concerted effort to divide this subverse into Boomers vs the rest, I've observed. Too often a seemingly great comment chain dissolves into "fuck off Boomer, what did you do to beat the cabal in your time?" It's seems to be another divide and conquer strat by the DS.
15744796? ago
This Boomer thing was started by Neon Revolt. Take the issue to him. I stopped following or even dealing with him due to this.
15749057? ago
"Boomer" was started before Neon surfaced, if I recall correctly.
Around day five or six, I started to see "boomer" pick up on half. But, I also saw it every once in a while on /pol/ before Q ever popped up.
15749154? ago
Neon Normalized it. He spent a solid 3 weeks calling everyone with good grammar boomers. he is as corrupt as the deep state and is just using this movement to make a buck. He is a Pay-Triot. Nothing will change my opinion of this.
15749221? ago
Sorry, I don't care whether or not you're convinced, I'm simply telling you what I remember seeing.
Even still, the only part of this argument I'll touch is that Neon has done important work, even if he supposedly fueled this fire. Granted, I don't care much about him and I've never needed his work to better understand things, so don't think I'll defend him too much. But, I do think you're pushing curiously hard for people not to trust him. Who cares that much who fanned the fire if their other contributions have outweighed such? Him adding a lot of content to the community isn't something anyone can deny with a sound head.
15749568? ago
"Pushing curiously hard" and "only part of this argument" <<<< Only person arguing is you. I have a right to my opinion and I am only stating such. IF that is pushing "curiously hard" and "an argument" then you are taking part in a very onesided argument because my opinion is mine and I never said you have to adopt it. So please tell me more about why I should care to respond after this... Oh, and Merry Christmas.
One more thing before I go, I never said he did not contribute good content, but it is not content I cannot get elsewhere, so good for him he is good at waiting a week and parroting the other people who are on it right away. But that being said, I am still allowed to my opinion. Nothing you say or do can change that. Good luck with that.
15750925? ago
I mean it seems like neither of us are really arguing or content to argue