META: Does the Q movement need 3 seperate subs with 12000 subscribers? Any ideas to ways of sorting all the information? Maybe tags? (QRV)

submitted ago by 2799769?

Like the title says, do we really need three separate subs towards one goal? And each having almost the same amount of subscribers.

In any case if that wouldn't be able to be accomplished, with the amount of information coming in, is there a way to sort it better? A multi-tag search would have been perfect. How could something like this be accomplished? Does anyone know?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

14554654? ago

GreatAwakening = SoapBoxBanHammer = ProtectVoat

All of the v/GreatAwakening mods were v/SoapBoxBanHammer mods who are in league with v/ProtectVoat in attacking Voat.

v/SoapBoxBanHammer seem to spam and down-vote brigade the shit out of good Voat communities and when the mod deletes their disgusting images, v/ProtectVoat manufactures a "censorship crisis" and attempts to get all of Voat to down-vote brigade that community.

Then, after the community has been crippled or the mods abandon it, one of the v/SoapBoxBanHammer mods requests to take it over or they create a replacement that their v/ProtectVoat sockpuppets naturally endorse.

All of these shills are pure globalist filth and it wouldn't surprise me if they are funded by Mossad.

Here's a breakdown of how v/SoapBoxBanHammer now own v/GreatAwakening:

plankO [M] - Has an extensive history of karma-farming on v/SoapBoxBanHammer;

Trigglypuff [D] - Archives prove Trigglypuff wasn't just a v/SoapBoxBanHammer cancer-mod but an owner;

MolochHunter [M] - Seems to have deleted all of his v/SoapBoxBanHammer posts since the ban;

srayzie [O] - Has a brief history of karma-farming on v/SoapBoxBanHammer, but worse is the fact this user invited 100% v/SoapBoxBanHammer domination of v/GreatAwakening.

Learn more here: https://voat.co/v/ProtectQRV/2781102