Here is an archive showing @sguevar's first comment to the OP, @ScrubbinOutOldBLue. OP was written 3 hours ago, while this comment was 2.2 hours later.
OP accused @sguevar of flairing it immediately, and @sguvar did NOT deny it; instead he defended his actions. In fact, he straight up admitted it.
You know, like Pelosi's "we have to arrest him to find out what he did wrong"(not verbatim) kind of thing, right? Guilty until proven innocent?
A member of the modlist of such a PRESTIGIOUS subverse like /v/ProtectVoat cannot even do a simple search of OP's short list of submissions to find out where this info was obtained. Lazy, stupid, and dishonest.
Did you know PV MOD @sguevar also threatened to flair all of @ScrubbinOutOldBlue's posts from now on? SOOB was right, this is just like the big-tech ministry of truth SNOPES fact-checking.
Right. Here. On. Voat.
He then tries to claim some moral high ground about SOOB being "misguided" and "corrupted" and "reprehensible", as if that is a justification for his actions.
Possible misninfo states what this was, a possible misinformation because you have not given any proof of it's veracity and you are trying to ignite a fire that I am very well capable of face.
... but ask for it proof .8 hours later, right?
Consistency. @sguevar has none.
Remember, kids. If a MOD of PV doesn't LIKE the content of your post, you'll get a nice little "possible misinfo" flair before they even check it! You have no rights on King Kevdude's subverse!
view the rest of the comments →
virge ago
Just remember wherever Sguevar is, WhiteRonin (or is it DarkRaven these days?) is always close-by.
SandHog ago
Interesting that you bring up DarkRaven. That user has recently attempted to draw me into some dumb bullshit on that aboutvoat sub or whatever it's called. I just asumed it was another alt of zyklon_reee. As for PV, I unsubscribed the other day and really don't see a purpose for this sub moving forward once @PuttItOut implements the Community Vote feature to keep power mods in check by allowing the members the option to remove them. I'd think I'd like to see him implement some form of vote transparency as well. I think that would help cut down on a lot of fuckery around here.
virge ago
DarkRaven types in the same excited exclamations as WhiteRonin. I'm sure the similarities in naming formatting is just a coincidence.
SandHog ago
Hmm, you might be on to something judging by the downvotes, lol. I never paid any attention to that guy because he never had much of anything interesting to say aside from ramping up the hate machine. It's also interesting how some people get so triggered over the idea of a little transparency in the voting process.
"But muh votes might be used to dox me!"
Nah, it will just expose the fucking manipulators for what they are. Funny to see them get so triggered over it, though. I hope @PuttItOut actually takes it under consideration given the opposition to the idea from the usual suspects.
virge ago
I strongly believe voting transparency is the only thing that frightens those who hide behind multiple accounts, those who coordinate voting as a group, and those who say one thing but their votes say another. It wasn't until this post that the daily downnvote brigade began following me around trying to censor me like you see today. What a (((coincidence))).
SandHog ago
I agree. Reddit went the opposite way and hid downvotes from public view which only made it easier for the manipulators to run rampant. It doesn't even need to be a global feature and maybe it shouldn't be. I do think that an individual should have the right to see who is consistently downvoting them time after time though. So many people have been driven away from Voat simply because someone disagreed with them and proceeded to hammer them with alts. That is censorship.
Kinda curious to see how all this turns out because I don't think the people who think they are winning are actually winning.
virge ago
I'll ping you in the future with this comment for a mutual laugh, because I know some things most don't. ;)
SandHog ago