You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

virge ago

Oh you poor subversive drama queen. An army of one tells you he's done trying to convince you to save Voat, and now you declare yourself a target.

Amusingly, demonstrating the very same guilt and virtue signalling tactics I accused you of, in the very same paragraph you copied your selectively picked quote from no less. https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3253353/18964392

Subversive faggots are hilariously transparent. Nobody cares, anyone with a brain can see right through you and all the rest of the useless piece of shit welfare eaters don't have skin in the game to begin with.

Keep crying to an audience of none.

Le_Squish ago

How many innocent bystanders have you attacked for daring to disagree with you?

The whore and white knights you defended have been outed. The titties and dick sucking picks have been seen by many. You should probably avoid making a further fool of yourself.

virge ago

The whore and white knights you defended have been outed.

Squish, I think you have me confused for someone else. Who are you accusing me of being, exactly?

I've never even interacted with the crowd you're referring to, let alone defended them. If you're accusing me of being someone else, I've interacted with you enough over the years to at least expect you to say the name - because I need a good instance when all this is said and done that I can poke you with with for a mutual laugh.

Le_Squish ago

You have been attacking innocent bystanders.

Your bullshit world salad doesn't change that. Disagreeing with you is not an attack. Typing long paragraphs does not make you right.

You'll just edit and delete your comments anyway later. Glad you showed your true colors.

virge ago

So which is it, did I defend some group of users you have no evidence I defended, or am I attacking "innocent bystanders" who are attacking me first?

Holy shit, you're also subverting. I get it now.

Le_Squish ago

How it be:

  • Attack innocent goats
  • Delete comments of those attacks
  • Play innocent because no proof
  • Do the "No you" thing in multiple paragraphs of circular "arguments"
  • Pretend to have been being reasonable all along.

Repeat ad infinitum. Except you suck and pick really innocuous targets so you at best, look like a jackass.

virge ago

Simple way to demonstrate how Le_Squish is lying: any user can use SearchVoat.co and see my posts, so the only thing deleting them on Voat does is effectively neutralize the collective effort of all of the subversive parasites I spent a week drawing attention to myself specifically to accomplish.

It was nothing more than a simple social experiment. Could I kick the hornets nests of both groups of faggots on Voat who are enemies of Putt and want to see Voat die, tie up their collective resources to whatever capacity I had at my disposal, and then in the end just delete the posts entirely thereby effectively nullifying all of the time the subversive parasites spent chasing me around downvoting everything. What might really cook your noodle later is the simple question of what a dozen people doing the same thing I did might accomplish to these organized subversion groups resources.

It's simple root cause analysis and causality at play. I determined Voat was being targeted by various people and/or groups, all with the chaotic yet singular purpose of taking over Voat from Putt through subversion, vote manipulation, narrative phrasing, etc.

Enemies of Putt's are enemies of mine because Putt and I see eye to eye on Free Speech, so now I have both identified the enemies, including their various factions and sub-factions, in addition to a long list of people who did the following behavior:

  • Accused me of being someone I am not, either directly or indirectly like Le_Squish. What are the reasonable explanations for this? One is legitimate confusion, but it happened so many times and I was never accused of being the same user twice that I remember, so I have a hard time analyzing what this is other than people being too tinfoil hat or paranoid. Easy to determine, since I'm not those people.
  • Attempted to paint some ridiculous emotional negativity associated with me deleting my post history, almost always while knowing full well nothing is ever deleted on the Internet and between SearchVoat.co and archives one can easily still see my post history, so this is a strategy used to intentionally discredit me as an individual using manipulation.
  • Various users of no allegiance can simply be deconstructed by their post history to be exhibiting the common symptoms of one or more personality and mental disorders. Chaos human factor and all, so these ones are impossible (looking at you, Dial).

It's posts like these I won't delete, because the post is purely to illuminate something for myself in the future, and for the observer with a reasonable curiosity to both read and verify the validity of. That user needs to decide if they are with or against Putt, because this is the kind of behavior being done daily to the entire community by the users against Putt.

Le_Squish ago

Thank you for the demonstration.

virge ago

I appreciate your participation leading to the conclusion where I can begin the sharing phase. Discovery, analysis, and countermeasures have all been prepared.